computo ergo sum

2026-10-01 · chapter Yang–Mills and the mass gapPart 1 Mathematical preparationgroups, SO(3), SU(2)

The whole book Contents and reading orders
  1. Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
  2. 0-01 How to read this book
  3. 0-02 One picture
  4. 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
  5. 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
  6. Part 1 Mathematical preparation
  7. 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
  8. 1-02 What a group is
  9. 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
  10. 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
  11. 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
  12. 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
  13. 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
  14. 1-08 Probability and measure
  15. 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
  16. 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
  17. 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
  18. 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
  19. Part 2 Physical preparation
  20. 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
  21. 2-02 The idea of a field
  22. 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
  23. 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
  24. 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
  25. 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
  26. 2-07 The idea of the path integral
  27. 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
  28. 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
  29. 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
  30. Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
  31. 3-01 The gauge principle
  32. 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
  33. 3-03 The action and the equations
  34. 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
  35. 3-05 Instantons and topology
  36. 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
  37. 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
  38. Part 4 Quantisation
  39. 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
  40. 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
  41. 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
  42. 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
  43. 4-05 The algebra of divergences
  44. 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
  45. 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
  46. 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
  47. 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
  48. 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
  49. 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
  50. 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
  51. Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
  52. 5-01 Wilson's lattice
  53. 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
  54. 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
  55. 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
  56. 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
  57. 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
  58. 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
  59. 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
  60. 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
  61. 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
  62. 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
  63. Part 6 Constructive field theory
  64. 6-01 What constructive field theory is
  65. 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
  66. 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
  67. 6-04 The cluster expansion
  68. 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
  69. 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
  70. 6-07 Four dimensions
  71. 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
  72. 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
  73. 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
  74. 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
  75. 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
  76. Part 7 From the side of physics
  77. 7-01 How physics sees it
  78. 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
  79. 7-03 The string picture
  80. 7-04 Large N
  81. 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
  82. 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
  83. 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
  84. 7-08 Holography
  85. 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
  86. 7-10 Back to four dimensions
  87. 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
  88. 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
  89. 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
  90. Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
  91. 8-01 How to read the dictionary
  92. 8-02 Dictionary A
  93. 8-03 Dictionary B
  94. 8-04 Dictionary C
  95. 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
  96. Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
  97. 9-01 How far the world has come
  98. 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
  99. 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
  100. 9-04 The list of open tasks
  101. 9-05 Common misconceptions
  102. Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
  103. 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
  104. 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
  105. 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
  106. 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
  107. 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
  108. 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
  109. 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
  110. 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
  111. 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
  112. 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
  113. 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
  114. 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
  115. 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
  116. 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
  117. 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
  118. 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
  119. 10-16 What is not claimed
  120. 10-17 Insights and small questions
  121. Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
  122. 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
  123. 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
  124. 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
  125. 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
  126. 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
  127. 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
  128. 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
  129. 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
  130. 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
  131. 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
  132. Appendices
  133. A-01 Table of notation
  134. A-02 Glossary
  135. A-03 Guide to the literature
  136. A-04 Lean and machine checking
  137. A-05 How this book was made
  138. A-06 Index of assumptions

What a group is — treating symmetries as "things that can be multiplied"

What this chapter shows — The rules of a group, and examples. SO(3), the group of rotations in three dimensions, and SU(2), which covers it twice (it does not return at 360° but returns at 720°). "Representations", which write a group as matrices. How to read "compact simple gauge group" in the problem statement.

Prerequisite chapters — 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps (determinants, unitary matrices, the matrix exponential). Lie algebras are treated in 1-03, and the Pauli matrices and SU(3) in 1-04.

Said first — This chapter is preparation, and shows nothing about the mass gap. Theorems cited without proof carry the "Known" label.

Order of this chapter
  1. From symmetry to groups — the six operations of an equilateral triangle and their multiplication table (a figure with choices)
  2. The definition of a group, and examples — commutative and non-commutative, groups of matrices, compactness
  3. Homomorphisms, normal subgroups, quotients — tools for comparing groups, the centre
  4. The rotation group SO(3) — axes, the mismatch from the order of rotations (moving figure)
  5. SU(2) — the three-dimensional sphere, half angles
  6. The double cover SU(2) → SO(3) — returning at 720° (moving figure)
  7. Detour: the shape of SO(3) and the 720° loop — loops that shrink and loops that do not (moving figure)
  8. A first look at representations — integer labels, irreducibility, spin
  9. The group inside Yang–Mills — gauge group, compact, simple

01

From symmetry to groups

There are six ways to put an equilateral triangular plate back so that it fits exactly over its original place: three rotations by 0°, 120° and 240°, and three flips about an axis through a vertex. Doing two in succession gives one of the six again, and there is an operation that does nothing and operations that undo. A group is the word for exactly these properties and nothing more.

Label the vertices 0, 1, 2 anticlockwise, and write ee (do nothing), rr (rotate by 120°), r2r^2 (240°), and sks_k (flip about the axis through vertex k). The product abab is read "first b, then a" (the direction of composition of maps a∘ba\circ b).

r∘s0=s2,s0∘r=s1r\circ s_0 = s_2, \qquad s_0\circ r = s_1

Swapping the order changes the result. That the order of multiplication matters is the protagonist all the way to the end of this book.

Figure 1 Choosing a cell of the table (row a, column b) lines up the triangle as "start → after b → after a∘b". A coloured triangle is in the flipped state.
a \ berr²s₀s₁s₂
eerr²s₀s₁s₂
rrr²es₂s₀s₁
r²r²ers₁s₂s₀
s₀s₀s₁s₂err²
s₁s₁s₂s₀r²er
s₂s₂s₀s₁rr²e

ComputedThe values in the table were computed on this machine as compositions of permutations of the vertices. The rules of a group were also checked for every combination.

That each of the six elements appears exactly once in each row and each column reflects the fact that ax=bax=b has exactly one solution x=a−1bx=a^{-1}b, that is, that division is possible. Of the 36 ordered pairs, ab≠baab\ne ba for 18 Computed.

02

The definition of a group, and examples

Definition If there is a set GG and a rule (product) (a,b)↦ab(a,b)\mapsto ab that makes one element of GG from two elements, satisfying the following, GG is called a group.

  1. Associative law: (ab)c=a(bc)(ab)c=a(bc).
  2. Identity: there is ee with ea=ae=aea=ae=a for all aa.
  3. Inverses: for each aa there is a−1a^{-1} with aa−1=a−1a=eaa^{-1}=a^{-1}a=e.

If ab=baab=ba for every pair, the group is commutative (an abelian group); otherwise it is non-commutative. The "non-abelian" of "non-abelian gauge theory" has this meaning. The second half of the table below is groups of matrices, where U†U^\dagger is the transpose with complex conjugation (1-01).

GroupElements (product)Commutative?Compact?Real parameters
ZN\mathbb{Z}_NRemainders on division by N (addition)CommutativeFinite0
D3D_3The six operations of an equilateral triangleNon-commutativeFinite0
R\mathbb{R}Real numbers (addition)CommutativeNo1
U(1)\mathrm{U}(1)eiθe^{i\theta} (multiplication)CommutativeYes1
GL(n,R)\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})Invertible real matricesNon-commutativeNon2n^2
O(n)\mathrm{O}(n)Real matrices with RTR=IR^{\mathsf T}R=INon-commutativeYesn(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2
SO(n)\mathrm{SO}(n)Those of O(n)\mathrm{O}(n) with det⁡R=1\det R=1Non-commutative for n≥3n\ge3Yesn(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2
U(n)\mathrm{U}(n)Complex matrices with U†U=IU^\dagger U=INon-commutativeYesn2n^2
SU(n)\mathrm{SU}(n)Those of U(n)\mathrm{U}(n) with det⁡U=1\det U=1Non-commutativeYesn2−1n^2-1

Groups of matrices are n≥2n\ge2. SO(2) is a commutative group of the same form as U(1).

For groups of matrices, compact means bounded and closed (the limit of a sequence of elements is again an element) in the space of entries Known. U(n) is bounded because each column has length 1, and U†U=IU^\dagger U=I is preserved in the limit. GL(n, ℝ) is not bounded. "Real parameters" is the number of real numbers that specify an element (the dimension of the group, 1-03); for SO(3) it is 2 for the direction of the axis and 1 for the angle.

03

Homomorphisms, normal subgroups, quotients

A subgroup is a subset closed under products and inverses ({e,r,r2}⊂D3\{e,r,r^2\}\subset D_3, SU(n) ⊂ U(n), and so on). A homomorphism is a map φ:G→H\varphi:G\to H satisfying φ(ab)=φ(a)φ(b)\varphi(ab)=\varphi(a)\varphi(b), and the set of elements sent to the identity is called the kernel ker⁡φ\ker\varphi.

det⁡:U(n)→U(1),det⁡(UV)=det⁡U det⁡V\det:\mathrm{U}(n)\to\mathrm{U}(1),\qquad \det(UV)=\det U\,\det V

The kernel of this homomorphism is SU(n)\mathrm{SU}(n). The kernel of θ↦eiθ\theta\mapsto e^{i\theta} is 2πZ2\pi\mathbb{Z}. The map sending the rotations of D₃ to +1 and the flips to −1 is also a homomorphism. A subgroup NN is normal if gNg−1=NgNg^{-1}=N for all gg, and a kernel is always normal. Then the quotient group G/NG/N, which identifies gg and gngn (n∈Nn\in N), can be formed, and for a surjective homomorphism φ\varphi the following holds (the homomorphism theorem) Known.

G/ker⁡φ  ≅  HG/\ker\varphi\;\cong\;H

Example: R/2πZ≅U(1)\mathbb{R}/2\pi\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathrm{U}(1) (an angle is a real number with differences of integer multiples of 2π forgotten). The centre Z(G)Z(G) (the elements that commute with every element) is also a normal subgroup, and the centre of SU(n) is the n elements ωI\omega I (ωn=1\omega^n=1), of the same form as Zn\mathbb{Z}_n Known. It appears again in 7-02, which treats confinement.

04

The rotation group SO(3)

A rotation in three dimensions is a linear map that preserves the inner product (RTR=IR^{\mathsf T}R=I) and makes no mirror image (det⁡R=1\det R=1).

SO(3)={ R∈M3(R):RTR=I, det⁡R=1 }\mathrm{SO}(3)=\{\,R\in M_3(\mathbb{R}) : R^{\mathsf T}R=I,\ \det R=1\,\}

Every rotation has an axis

Every element of SO(3) has a line that does not move (Euler's rotation theorem) Known. A real orthogonal matrix is unitary as a complex matrix (1-01), so its eigenvalues have absolute value 1, and their product is det⁡R=1\det R=1. They are roots of a cubic with real coefficients, so complex eigenvalues come in pairs λ,λˉ\lambda,\bar\lambda (product ∣λ∣2=1|\lambda|^2=1), and the remaining real eigenvalue is 1. If all are real, they are three values ±1 with product 1, so again they include 1. The eigenvector of that eigenvalue is the axis. Odd dimension matters here: some rotations in four dimensions have no fixed point other than the origin. With axis nn and angle θ\theta it has the following form (Rodrigues' formula) Known.

R(θ,n) x=cos⁡θ x+sin⁡θ (n×x)+(1−cos⁡θ)(n⋅x) nR(\theta,n)\,x=\cos\theta\,x+\sin\theta\,(n\times x)+(1-\cos\theta)(n\cdot x)\,n

The trace is tr⁡R(θ,n)=1+2cos⁡θ\operatorname{tr}R(\theta,n)=1+2\cos\theta, from which the angle can be read.

The mismatch from the order of rotations

Rotate by the same angle θ about the x axis and the y axis. "x first" is A=Ry(θ)Rx(θ)A=R_y(\theta)R_x(\theta), "y first" is B=Rx(θ)Ry(θ)B=R_x(\theta)R_y(\theta). The mismatch D=AB−1D=AB^{-1} is also a rotation, so we measure the difference by its angle φ.

Figure 2 Changing the angle θ with the slider changes the difference between the final orientations of the two boxes. "Rotate in turn" replays the two rotations in order.
θφφ / θ² (in radians)
1°0.0175°1.0000
10°1.7409°0.9975
30°15.3639°0.9781
45°33.6842°0.9531
60°57.9100°0.9217
90°120.0000°0.8488
180°0°0

ComputedThe table was computed on this machine from products of rotation matrices. The φ in the figure is computed on the spot from the same formula.

For small θ, φ≈θ2\varphi\approx\theta^2, and the axis of D is almost in the −z direction ((−0.087, 0.087, −0.992) at θ = 10°) Computed. The mismatch is second order in θ, and to first order rotations look commutative. Extracting this gives the commutator [X,Y]=XY−YX[X,Y]=XY-YX of 1-03. At θ = 180° both are diagonal matrices and commute.

05

SU(2)

Next is a group of complex 2×2 matrices.

SU(2)={ U∈M2(C):U†U=I, det⁡U=1 }\mathrm{SU}(2)=\{\,U\in M_2(\mathbb{C}) : U^\dagger U=I,\ \det U=1\,\}

The two columns are orthonormal. If the first column is (a,b)(a,b), then ∣a∣2+∣b∣2=1|a|^2+|b|^2=1, and the second column is a vector of length 1 orthogonal to it, eiχ(−bˉ,aˉ)e^{i\chi}(-\bar b,\bar a), with det⁡U=eiχ=1\det U=e^{i\chi}=1.

U=(a−bˉbaˉ),∣a∣2+∣b∣2=1U=\begin{pmatrix} a & -\bar b\\ b & \bar a\end{pmatrix},\qquad |a|^2+|b|^2=1

The real and imaginary parts of a, b form a point on the unit sphere of R4\mathbb{R}^4, and as a space, SU(2) is the three-dimensional sphere S3S^3 Known. Using the Pauli matrices (1-04), every element can be written with a unit vector nn and a real number θ.

σ1=(0110),σ2=(0−ii0),σ3=(100−1)\sigma_1=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix},\quad \sigma_2=\begin{pmatrix}0&-i\\ i&0\end{pmatrix},\quad \sigma_3=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}

Writing n⋅σ=n1σ1+n2σ2+n3σ3n\cdot\sigma=n_1\sigma_1+n_2\sigma_2+n_3\sigma_3, it has the following form.

U(θ,n)=cos⁡θ2 I−isin⁡θ2 n⋅σ=exp⁡ ⁣(−iθ2 n⋅σ)U(\theta,n)=\cos\tfrac{\theta}{2}\,I-i\sin\tfrac{\theta}{2}\,n\cdot\sigma=\exp\!\Big(-\tfrac{i\theta}{2}\,n\cdot\sigma\Big)

In components, a=cos⁡θ2−in3sin⁡θ2a=\cos\frac\theta2-in_3\sin\frac\theta2, b=(n2−in1)sin⁡θ2b=(n_2-in_1)\sin\frac\theta2. The equality on the right follows from (n⋅σ)2=I(n\cdot\sigma)^2=I (from σjσk+σkσj=2δjkI\sigma_j\sigma_k+\sigma_k\sigma_j=2\delta_{jk}I and ∣n∣=1|n|=1; how to check it is in 1-04) and the matrix exponential (1-01). At θ = 2π it is U=−IU=-I whatever n is, and only at θ = 4π does it become U=IU=I. This half angle is the protagonist of the next section.

06

The double cover SU(2) → SO(3)

Identify vectors of R3\mathbb{R}^3 with traceless Hermitian matrices.

x  ⟷  X=x⋅σ=(x3x1−ix2x1+ix2−x3),det⁡X=−∣x∣2x\;\longleftrightarrow\;X=x\cdot\sigma=\begin{pmatrix}x_3 & x_1-ix_2\\ x_1+ix_2 & -x_3\end{pmatrix},\qquad \det X=-|x|^2

UXU†UXU^\dagger is also Hermitian and traceless, so it is the matrix of some vector x′x'. This fixes a linear map ρ(U):x↦x′\rho(U):x\mapsto x' Known.

  1. It preserves length: ∣x′∣=∣x∣|x'|=|x| follows from det⁡(UXU†)=det⁡X\det(UXU^\dagger)=\det X. SU(2) is connected and ρ is continuous, so the determinant cannot move from +1, and ρ(U)∈SO(3)\rho(U)\in\mathrm{SO}(3).
  2. It is a homomorphism: ρ(UV)=ρ(U)ρ(V)\rho(UV)=\rho(U)\rho(V) follows from (UV)X(UV)†=U(VXV†)U†(UV)X(UV)^\dagger=U(VXV^\dagger)U^\dagger.
  3. Its kernel is ±I: if ρ(U)=I\rho(U)=I, then U commutes with σ₃ (it is diagonal) and with σ₁ (its diagonal entries are equal), so U=λIU=\lambda I, det⁡U=λ2=1\det U=\lambda^2=1.
  4. It is surjective, and the angle is halved: ρ(U(θ,n))=R(θ,n)\rho(U(\theta,n))=R(\theta,n). Every rotation has the form R(θ,n)R(\theta,n) (the axis theorem of 04), so U(θ,n)U(\theta,n) is its preimage, and the map is surjective.

A simple case of 4: if n is the z axis, U=diag(e−iθ/2,eiθ/2)U=\mathrm{diag}(e^{-i\theta/2},e^{i\theta/2}) gives Uσ1U†=cos⁡θ σ1+sin⁡θ σ2U\sigma_1U^\dagger=\cos\theta\,\sigma_1+\sin\theta\,\sigma_2. The two half angles multiply together to give the angle θ. From the homomorphism theorem,

SO(3)  ≅  SU(2)/{±I}\mathrm{SO}(3)\;\cong\;\mathrm{SU}(2)/\{\pm I\}

Two elements ±U\pm U correspond to one rotation, so it is called a double cover. A 360° rotation goes in SU(2) only from II to −I-I, and returning takes 720°.

Figure 3 Changing the angle θ with the slider, the object on the left (an arrow seen from above) returns to its original state at 360°, while the point on the right goes round its circle at half the speed and returns at 720°. The point on the right is the two coefficients (cos⁡θ2,sin⁡θ2)(\cos\frac{\theta}{2},\sin\frac{\theta}{2}) of U(θ)=cos⁡θ2 I−isin⁡θ2 σ3U(\theta)=\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\,I-i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\,\sigma_3, one of the great circles in S3S^3.
θtr⁡R(θ)=1+2cos⁡θ\operatorname{tr}R(\theta)=1+2\cos\thetatr⁡U(θ)=2cos⁡θ2\operatorname{tr}U(\theta)=2\cos\frac{\theta}{2}RRUU
0°32II+I+I
180°−10180° about the z axis−iσ3-i\sigma_3
360°3−2II−I-I
540°−10180° about the z axis+iσ3+i\sigma_3
720°32II+I+I

ComputedComputed on this machine by building ρ(U). Orthogonality (maximum deviation 1.2×10⁻¹⁵), the homomorphism property and ρ(−U) = ρ(U) were checked for 20,000 random U, and agreement with Rodrigues' formula (maximum deviation 1.0×10⁻¹⁵) for 2,000 pairs (θ, n).

07

Detour: the shape of SO(3) and the 720° loop

Detour

A section that may be skipped. It is not a prerequisite for later chapters. It looks at the double cover as a "shape".

Represent the rotation by angle θ (0 ≤ θ ≤ π) about the axis n by the point θn\theta n in a ball of radius π. Rotations by π about n and about −n are the same, so SO(3) is a ball of radius π with antipodal points of its surface glued together Known.

The path 0°→360° about the z axis is a loop that goes from the centre to the north pole, comes out of the south pole, which is the same point, and returns to the centre; it cannot be shrunk to a point Known. Lifted to SU(2), it is a path from II to −I-I. Deforming the loop continuously moves the end point of the lift continuously, but the end point cannot jump between the two points ±I\pm I. The lift of a one-point loop ends at II, so the loop cannot be deformed into one. The 720° loop, lifted, also ends at II, and does in fact shrink.

Figure 4 The first half of the slider tilts the axis of the second turn, and the second half shrinks the "there and back" path. Switching to "360° loop", however the axis is tilted, the path still crosses the rim once (even under general deformations, the parity of the number of crossings does not change).
LoopNumber of crossings of the rimEnd point in SU(2)Shrinks to a point?
360°1 (odd)−I-IDoes not shrink
720°2, becoming 0 in the second half of the deformation (even)+I+IShrinks

KnownThe disc is a cross-section of the ball, and two opposite points of the rim are the same rotation. It is a schematic that draws only the coordinates of the path; the parity of the number of crossings (when the path does not touch the rim) corresponds to the classification of loops.

Loops in SO(3) come in two kinds, "shrinks" and "does not shrink" (the fundamental group is Z2\mathbb{Z}_2), and in S3S^3 every loop shrinks Known. The "plate trick", in which turning a plate held level on your hand through one revolution twists your arm and a second revolution untwists it, is often explained as the visible form of this fact. To be exact, the orientations of the points from shoulder to hand form a path in SO(3), and the motion of that path during the 720° turn is a deformation that shrinks the loop.

08

A first look at representations

Definition A (finite-dimensional) representation of a group G is a pair of a vector space V and a homomorphism π:G→GL(V)\pi:G\to GL(V) (continuous, for groups of matrices); that is, an assignment of an invertible matrix to each element such that π(gh)=π(g)π(h)\pi(gh)=\pi(g)\pi(h) (dim⁡V\dim V is the dimension). Examples: the trivial representation (everything to 1), writing D₃ by rotations and reflections of the plane, the action of SO(3) on R3\mathbb{R}^3 and of SU(2) on C2\mathbb{C}^2 (the defining representation), and the 3-dimensional representation ρ.

Representations of U(1) are labelled by integers

For eiθ↦eiqθe^{i\theta}\mapsto e^{iq\theta} to be a representation of U(1), since θ and θ + 2π are the same element, e2πiq=1e^{2\pi iq}=1, that is, q is an integer. These exhaust the continuous 1-dimensional unitary representations Known. For ℝ, x↦eiqxx\mapsto e^{iqx} is a representation for any real q, so what makes the labels integers is compactness. The physical argument that if the gauge group of electromagnetism (2-03) is U(1) then charges line up as integer multiples of a unit rests on this fact (the title of C. N. Yang 1970 states this correspondence) Physics.

Irreducible and completely reducible

A subspace W with π(g)W⊂W\pi(g)W\subset W for all g is called invariant, and a representation with no invariant subspaces other than 0 and V is called irreducible. The action of SO(3) on R3\mathbb{R}^3 is irreducible; representing D₃ by permutations of the coordinates of R3\mathbb{R}^3 leaves the line (1, 1, 1) invariant, so it is not irreducible. A finite-dimensional representation of a compact group splits into a direct sum of irreducible representations (complete reducibility) Known. If the inner product is averaged over the whole group, every π(g)\pi(g) preserves that inner product, and the orthogonal complement of an invariant subspace is also invariant. For a finite group the average is the sum over all elements divided by the number of elements. For a compact group, the same can be done with an invariant integral on the group (its existence is known).

Representations of SU(2) and the sign at 360°

SU(2) has exactly one finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation in each dimension, up to equivalence (change of basis) Known. The one of dimension m + 1 is Πm\Pi_m, acting by (Πm(U)f)(z)=f(U−1z)(\Pi_m(U)f)(z)=f(U^{-1}z) on the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree m in 2 variables, and in physics j=m/2j=m/2 is called the spin. −I-I acts as f(−z)=(−1)mf(z)f(-z)=(-1)^mf(z), so the ones that can be representations of SO(3) are only those with m even (odd dimension).

mDimensionSpin jCharacter χ(360∘)\chi(360^\circ)A representation of SO(3)?
010+1Yes
121/2−2No
231+3Yes
343/2−4No
452+5Yes

The character χ is the trace of the representation matrix, measured at U(θ,e3)U(\theta,e_3). At 720° every one returns to the value of the dimension Computed. For half-integer spin the sign flips at 360° — the −I-I of Figure 3 appears, on the side of representations, as this sign.

09

The group inside Yang–Mills

The problem statement (0-03) begins with conditions on the group.

Prove that for any compact simple gauge group G, a non-trivial quantum Yang–Mills theory exists on R⁴ and has a mass gap Δ > 0.

Jaffe and Witten's description of the problem says "at the level of classical theory, replace the gauge group U(1) of electromagnetism by a compact gauge group G". In a word, the gauge group is the group of symmetries that can be applied independently at each point of spacetime. To be exact, a choice of one element g(x) of G at each point x is a gauge transformation, and G is the group in which it takes values (3-01).

Simple. As an abstract group, "simple" means that the only normal subgroups are {e} and the group itself, and in this sense SU(2) is not simple (its centre {±I} is a normal subgroup). In the terminology of Lie groups the meaning is different: a connected non-commutative group is called "simple" if its Lie algebra is simple (1-03). The description of the problem does not define simple, but in the sense of abstract groups every SU(N) (N ≥ 2) would be excluded (centre ZN\mathbb{Z}_N), so this book reads it in the sense of Lie groups. SU(N) (N ≥ 2) is simple in this sense (the list is in 1-04) Known, and the commutative U(1) is not included.

Compact. The same description states that with a compact gauge group and a compactified spacetime, Wilson's lattice approximation reduces the functional integral to a finite-dimensional integral. An element of G is put on each edge of the lattice and integrated over the whole of G (5-01), so it matters that the size of G is finite.

Representations. The same description says that in the theory of the strong force (QCD) the gauge group is SU(3), and quarks transform in the fundamental representation (this chapter's defining representation). The gauge field takes values in the Lie algebra of G. Under transformations that apply the same element at each point it transforms in the adjoint representation (1-04), and under general gauge transformations an extra term is added (3-02). The field strength transforms in the adjoint representation. The pure Yang–Mills theory the problem treats has no quarks, only the gauge field (3-07). Lattice models with G a finite group are treated in 5-10.

Next is 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras: the "second-order mismatch" is extracted as the commutator of the infinitesimal part of the group.


What this chapter can say

ItemWhat is saidWhat is not said
Definition of a group, and examplesDefinition and examples. The table of D3D_3 ComputedThe general theory of groups
SO(3)The outline of the proof that an axis exists. The numbers of the mismatch φ≈θ2\varphi\approx\theta^2 ComputedThe reason it becomes θ2\theta^2 (the commutator) is in 1-03
Double coverThat ρ is a homomorphism to SO(3) with kernel ±I\pm I. ρ(U(θ,n))=R(θ,n)\rho(U(\theta,n))=R(\theta,n) by formula for the z axis, numerically for general n ComputedA proof by formula for general n Known
Loops in SO(3)An explanation, by figure and by lifting, that the 360° loop does not shrink and the 720° loop doesA complete proof that the fundamental group is Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 (the path lifting theorem) Known
RepresentationsWhy representations of U(1) are labelled by integers. The sign of Πm\Pi_m at 360° ComputedThe classification of irreducible representations of SU(2) and a proof of complete reducibility Known. Quantisation of charge is physics Physics
Yang–MillsHow to read the conditions on the group in the problem statement (compact, simple)Shows nothing about the mass gap or the construction of the theory

Sources and reproduction

ItemKindSource / tool
The problem statement, replacing U(1) by G, QCD and the fundamental representation, finite-dimensional integrals on the lattice. That simple is not definedPrimary source (text checked)A. Jaffe, E. Witten, “Quantum Yang–Mills Theory”, the Clay Mathematics Institute's description of the problem (PDF on the Institute's website; no date given; bibliographic details in the source table of 0-03)
Definition of compactness, the two-to-one SU(2) → SO(3), that SU(2) is simply connected and the universal cover of SO(3), complete reducibility (Prop. 5.17, using an invariant measure on the group), simplicity of abstract groups (note to Exercise 13 of Chapter 1), simplicity of Lie algebras (beginning of Chapter 7), Πm\Pi_mKnown (text checked)B. C. Hall, “An Elementary Introduction to Groups and Representations”, arXiv:math-ph/0005032 (2000)
The model of SO(3) as a ball of radius π with antipodal points of its surface glued, the fundamental group Z2\mathbb{Z}_2, that the S3S^3 loop shrinksKnown (text checked)A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press (2002). In the version made public by the author, §3.D (SO(3)≈RP3\mathrm{SO}(3)\approx\mathbb{RP}^3), Example 1.43 (π1(RPn)≅Z2\pi_1(\mathbb{RP}^n)\cong\mathbb{Z}_2), Prop. 1.14 (π1(Sn)=0\pi_1(S^n)=0, n≥2n\ge2)
"Simple" for Lie groups (connected, non-commutative, Lie algebra simple)A terminological convention of this bookThe definitions for abstract groups and Lie algebras were checked in Hall's notes above. A textbook stating this convention explicitly for Lie groups has not been checked
Quantisation of charge and compactness of the gauge groupBibliographic data only (title and abstract)C. N. Yang, “Charge Quantization, Compactness of the Gauge Group, and Flux Quantization”, Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 2360
The table of D3D_3 (ab≠baab\ne ba for 18/36), φ(θ)\varphi(\theta), the checks of the double cover, the signs and characters of Πm\Pi_m (m = 0–6)Computed on this machinePython 3.12, NumPy 1.26. Compositions of permutations, products of rotation matrices, 20,000 uniform U on S3S^3 and 2,000 pairs (θ, n), representation matrices on homogeneous polynomials (maximum deviation from the homomorphism property 5.8×10⁻¹⁵)
Figures 1–4FiguresPlain JavaScript. Figure 1 uses a precomputed table; Figures 2–4 compute the formulas for rotations and cos and sin on the spot

← 1-01 Vector spaces and linear mapsContents1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras →

Revised 2026-10-01: first version.