The whole book Contents and reading orders
- Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
- 0-01 How to read this book
- 0-02 One picture
- 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
- 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
- Part 1 Mathematical preparation
- 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
- 1-02 What a group is
- 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
- 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
- 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
- 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
- 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
- 1-08 Probability and measure
- 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
- 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
- 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
- 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
- Part 2 Physical preparation
- 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
- 2-02 The idea of a field
- 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
- 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
- 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
- 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
- 2-07 The idea of the path integral
- 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
- 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
- 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
- Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
- 3-01 The gauge principle
- 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
- 3-03 The action and the equations
- 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
- 3-05 Instantons and topology
- 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
- 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
- Part 4 Quantisation
- 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
- 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
- 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
- 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
- 4-05 The algebra of divergences
- 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
- 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
- 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
- 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
- 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
- 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
- 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
- Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
- 5-01 Wilson's lattice
- 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
- 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
- 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
- 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
- 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
- 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
- 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
- 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
- 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
- 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
- Part 6 Constructive field theory
- 6-01 What constructive field theory is
- 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
- 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
- 6-04 The cluster expansion
- 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
- 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
- 6-07 Four dimensions
- 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
- 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
- 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
- 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
- 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
- Part 7 From the side of physics
- 7-01 How physics sees it
- 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
- 7-03 The string picture
- 7-04 Large N
- 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
- 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
- 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
- 7-08 Holography
- 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
- 7-10 Back to four dimensions
- 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
- 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
- 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
- Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
- 8-01 How to read the dictionary
- 8-02 Dictionary A
- 8-03 Dictionary B
- 8-04 Dictionary C
- 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
- Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
- 9-01 How far the world has come
- 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
- 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
- 9-04 The list of open tasks
- 9-05 Common misconceptions
- Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
- 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
- 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
- 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
- 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
- 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
- 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
- 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
- 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
- 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
- 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
- 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
- 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
- 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
- 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
- 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
- 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
- 10-16 What is not claimed
- 10-17 Insights and small questions
- Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
- 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
- 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
- 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
- 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
- 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
- 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
- 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
- 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
- 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
- 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
- Appendices
- A-01 Table of notation
- A-02 Glossary
- A-03 Guide to the literature
- A-04 Lean and machine checking
- A-05 How this book was made
- A-06 Index of assumptions
What a group is — treating symmetries as "things that can be multiplied"
What this chapter shows — The rules of a group, and examples. SO(3), the group of rotations in three dimensions, and SU(2), which covers it twice (it does not return at 360° but returns at 720°). "Representations", which write a group as matrices. How to read "compact simple gauge group" in the problem statement.
Prerequisite chapters — 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps (determinants, unitary matrices, the matrix exponential). Lie algebras are treated in 1-03, and the Pauli matrices and SU(3) in 1-04.
Said first — This chapter is preparation, and shows nothing about the mass gap. Theorems cited without proof carry the "Known" label.
- From symmetry to groups — the six operations of an equilateral triangle and their multiplication table (a figure with choices)
- The definition of a group, and examples — commutative and non-commutative, groups of matrices, compactness
- Homomorphisms, normal subgroups, quotients — tools for comparing groups, the centre
- The rotation group SO(3) — axes, the mismatch from the order of rotations (moving figure)
- SU(2) — the three-dimensional sphere, half angles
- The double cover SU(2) → SO(3) — returning at 720° (moving figure)
- Detour: the shape of SO(3) and the 720° loop — loops that shrink and loops that do not (moving figure)
- A first look at representations — integer labels, irreducibility, spin
- The group inside Yang–Mills — gauge group, compact, simple
From symmetry to groups
There are six ways to put an equilateral triangular plate back so that it fits exactly over its original place: three rotations by 0°, 120° and 240°, and three flips about an axis through a vertex. Doing two in succession gives one of the six again, and there is an operation that does nothing and operations that undo. A group is the word for exactly these properties and nothing more.
Label the vertices 0, 1, 2 anticlockwise, and write (do nothing), (rotate by 120°), (240°), and (flip about the axis through vertex k). The product is read "first b, then a" (the direction of composition of maps ).
Swapping the order changes the result. That the order of multiplication matters is the protagonist all the way to the end of this book.
| a \ b | e | r | r² | s₀ | s₁ | s₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e | e | r | r² | s₀ | s₁ | s₂ |
| r | r | r² | e | s₂ | s₀ | s₁ |
| r² | r² | e | r | s₁ | s₂ | s₀ |
| s₀ | s₀ | s₁ | s₂ | e | r | r² |
| s₁ | s₁ | s₂ | s₀ | r² | e | r |
| s₂ | s₂ | s₀ | s₁ | r | r² | e |
ComputedThe values in the table were computed on this machine as compositions of permutations of the vertices. The rules of a group were also checked for every combination.
That each of the six elements appears exactly once in each row and each column reflects the fact that has exactly one solution , that is, that division is possible. Of the 36 ordered pairs, for 18 Computed.
The definition of a group, and examples
Definition If there is a set and a rule (product) that makes one element of from two elements, satisfying the following, is called a group.
- Associative law: .
- Identity: there is with for all .
- Inverses: for each there is with .
If for every pair, the group is commutative (an abelian group); otherwise it is non-commutative. The "non-abelian" of "non-abelian gauge theory" has this meaning. The second half of the table below is groups of matrices, where is the transpose with complex conjugation (1-01).
| Group | Elements (product) | Commutative? | Compact? | Real parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remainders on division by N (addition) | Commutative | Finite | 0 | |
| The six operations of an equilateral triangle | Non-commutative | Finite | 0 | |
| Real numbers (addition) | Commutative | No | 1 | |
| (multiplication) | Commutative | Yes | 1 | |
| Invertible real matrices | Non-commutative | No | ||
| Real matrices with | Non-commutative | Yes | ||
| Those of with | Non-commutative for | Yes | ||
| Complex matrices with | Non-commutative | Yes | ||
| Those of with | Non-commutative | Yes |
Groups of matrices are . SO(2) is a commutative group of the same form as U(1).
For groups of matrices, compact means bounded and closed (the limit of a sequence of elements is again an element) in the space of entries Known. U(n) is bounded because each column has length 1, and is preserved in the limit. GL(n, ℝ) is not bounded. "Real parameters" is the number of real numbers that specify an element (the dimension of the group, 1-03); for SO(3) it is 2 for the direction of the axis and 1 for the angle.
Homomorphisms, normal subgroups, quotients
A subgroup is a subset closed under products and inverses (, SU(n) ⊂ U(n), and so on). A homomorphism is a map satisfying , and the set of elements sent to the identity is called the kernel .
The kernel of this homomorphism is . The kernel of is . The map sending the rotations of D₃ to +1 and the flips to −1 is also a homomorphism. A subgroup is normal if for all , and a kernel is always normal. Then the quotient group , which identifies and (), can be formed, and for a surjective homomorphism the following holds (the homomorphism theorem) Known.
Example: (an angle is a real number with differences of integer multiples of 2π forgotten). The centre (the elements that commute with every element) is also a normal subgroup, and the centre of SU(n) is the n elements (), of the same form as Known. It appears again in 7-02, which treats confinement.
The rotation group SO(3)
A rotation in three dimensions is a linear map that preserves the inner product () and makes no mirror image ().
Every rotation has an axis
Every element of SO(3) has a line that does not move (Euler's rotation theorem) Known. A real orthogonal matrix is unitary as a complex matrix (1-01), so its eigenvalues have absolute value 1, and their product is . They are roots of a cubic with real coefficients, so complex eigenvalues come in pairs (product ), and the remaining real eigenvalue is 1. If all are real, they are three values ±1 with product 1, so again they include 1. The eigenvector of that eigenvalue is the axis. Odd dimension matters here: some rotations in four dimensions have no fixed point other than the origin. With axis and angle it has the following form (Rodrigues' formula) Known.
The trace is , from which the angle can be read.
The mismatch from the order of rotations
Rotate by the same angle θ about the x axis and the y axis. "x first" is , "y first" is . The mismatch is also a rotation, so we measure the difference by its angle φ.
| θ | φ | φ / θ² (in radians) |
|---|---|---|
| 1° | 0.0175° | 1.0000 |
| 10° | 1.7409° | 0.9975 |
| 30° | 15.3639° | 0.9781 |
| 45° | 33.6842° | 0.9531 |
| 60° | 57.9100° | 0.9217 |
| 90° | 120.0000° | 0.8488 |
| 180° | 0° | 0 |
ComputedThe table was computed on this machine from products of rotation matrices. The φ in the figure is computed on the spot from the same formula.
For small θ, , and the axis of D is almost in the −z direction ((−0.087, 0.087, −0.992) at θ = 10°) Computed. The mismatch is second order in θ, and to first order rotations look commutative. Extracting this gives the commutator of 1-03. At θ = 180° both are diagonal matrices and commute.
SU(2)
Next is a group of complex 2×2 matrices.
The two columns are orthonormal. If the first column is , then , and the second column is a vector of length 1 orthogonal to it, , with .
The real and imaginary parts of a, b form a point on the unit sphere of , and as a space, SU(2) is the three-dimensional sphere Known. Using the Pauli matrices (1-04), every element can be written with a unit vector and a real number θ.
Writing , it has the following form.
In components, , . The equality on the right follows from (from and ; how to check it is in 1-04) and the matrix exponential (1-01). At θ = 2π it is whatever n is, and only at θ = 4π does it become . This half angle is the protagonist of the next section.
The double cover SU(2) → SO(3)
Identify vectors of with traceless Hermitian matrices.
is also Hermitian and traceless, so it is the matrix of some vector . This fixes a linear map Known.
- It preserves length: follows from . SU(2) is connected and ρ is continuous, so the determinant cannot move from +1, and .
- It is a homomorphism: follows from .
- Its kernel is ±I: if , then U commutes with σ₃ (it is diagonal) and with σ₁ (its diagonal entries are equal), so , .
- It is surjective, and the angle is halved: . Every rotation has the form (the axis theorem of 04), so is its preimage, and the map is surjective.
A simple case of 4: if n is the z axis, gives . The two half angles multiply together to give the angle θ. From the homomorphism theorem,
Two elements correspond to one rotation, so it is called a double cover. A 360° rotation goes in SU(2) only from to , and returning takes 720°.
| θ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0° | 3 | 2 | ||
| 180° | −1 | 0 | 180° about the z axis | |
| 360° | 3 | −2 | ||
| 540° | −1 | 0 | 180° about the z axis | |
| 720° | 3 | 2 |
ComputedComputed on this machine by building ρ(U). Orthogonality (maximum deviation 1.2×10⁻¹⁵), the homomorphism property and ρ(−U) = ρ(U) were checked for 20,000 random U, and agreement with Rodrigues' formula (maximum deviation 1.0×10⁻¹⁵) for 2,000 pairs (θ, n).
Detour: the shape of SO(3) and the 720° loop
A section that may be skipped. It is not a prerequisite for later chapters. It looks at the double cover as a "shape".
Represent the rotation by angle θ (0 ≤ θ ≤ π) about the axis n by the point in a ball of radius π. Rotations by π about n and about −n are the same, so SO(3) is a ball of radius π with antipodal points of its surface glued together Known.
The path 0°→360° about the z axis is a loop that goes from the centre to the north pole, comes out of the south pole, which is the same point, and returns to the centre; it cannot be shrunk to a point Known. Lifted to SU(2), it is a path from to . Deforming the loop continuously moves the end point of the lift continuously, but the end point cannot jump between the two points . The lift of a one-point loop ends at , so the loop cannot be deformed into one. The 720° loop, lifted, also ends at , and does in fact shrink.
| Loop | Number of crossings of the rim | End point in SU(2) | Shrinks to a point? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 360° | 1 (odd) | Does not shrink | |
| 720° | 2, becoming 0 in the second half of the deformation (even) | Shrinks |
KnownThe disc is a cross-section of the ball, and two opposite points of the rim are the same rotation. It is a schematic that draws only the coordinates of the path; the parity of the number of crossings (when the path does not touch the rim) corresponds to the classification of loops.
Loops in SO(3) come in two kinds, "shrinks" and "does not shrink" (the fundamental group is ), and in every loop shrinks Known. The "plate trick", in which turning a plate held level on your hand through one revolution twists your arm and a second revolution untwists it, is often explained as the visible form of this fact. To be exact, the orientations of the points from shoulder to hand form a path in SO(3), and the motion of that path during the 720° turn is a deformation that shrinks the loop.
A first look at representations
Definition A (finite-dimensional) representation of a group G is a pair of a vector space V and a homomorphism (continuous, for groups of matrices); that is, an assignment of an invertible matrix to each element such that ( is the dimension). Examples: the trivial representation (everything to 1), writing D₃ by rotations and reflections of the plane, the action of SO(3) on and of SU(2) on (the defining representation), and the 3-dimensional representation ρ.
Representations of U(1) are labelled by integers
For to be a representation of U(1), since θ and θ + 2π are the same element, , that is, q is an integer. These exhaust the continuous 1-dimensional unitary representations Known. For ℝ, is a representation for any real q, so what makes the labels integers is compactness. The physical argument that if the gauge group of electromagnetism (2-03) is U(1) then charges line up as integer multiples of a unit rests on this fact (the title of C. N. Yang 1970 states this correspondence) Physics.
Irreducible and completely reducible
A subspace W with for all g is called invariant, and a representation with no invariant subspaces other than 0 and V is called irreducible. The action of SO(3) on is irreducible; representing D₃ by permutations of the coordinates of leaves the line (1, 1, 1) invariant, so it is not irreducible. A finite-dimensional representation of a compact group splits into a direct sum of irreducible representations (complete reducibility) Known. If the inner product is averaged over the whole group, every preserves that inner product, and the orthogonal complement of an invariant subspace is also invariant. For a finite group the average is the sum over all elements divided by the number of elements. For a compact group, the same can be done with an invariant integral on the group (its existence is known).
Representations of SU(2) and the sign at 360°
SU(2) has exactly one finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation in each dimension, up to equivalence (change of basis) Known. The one of dimension m + 1 is , acting by on the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree m in 2 variables, and in physics is called the spin. acts as , so the ones that can be representations of SO(3) are only those with m even (odd dimension).
| m | Dimension | Spin j | Character | A representation of SO(3)? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | Yes |
| 1 | 2 | 1/2 | −2 | No |
| 2 | 3 | 1 | +3 | Yes |
| 3 | 4 | 3/2 | −4 | No |
| 4 | 5 | 2 | +5 | Yes |
The character χ is the trace of the representation matrix, measured at . At 720° every one returns to the value of the dimension Computed. For half-integer spin the sign flips at 360° — the of Figure 3 appears, on the side of representations, as this sign.
The group inside Yang–Mills
The problem statement (0-03) begins with conditions on the group.
Prove that for any compact simple gauge group G, a non-trivial quantum Yang–Mills theory exists on R⁴ and has a mass gap Δ > 0.
Jaffe and Witten's description of the problem says "at the level of classical theory, replace the gauge group U(1) of electromagnetism by a compact gauge group G". In a word, the gauge group is the group of symmetries that can be applied independently at each point of spacetime. To be exact, a choice of one element g(x) of G at each point x is a gauge transformation, and G is the group in which it takes values (3-01).
Simple. As an abstract group, "simple" means that the only normal subgroups are {e} and the group itself, and in this sense SU(2) is not simple (its centre {±I} is a normal subgroup). In the terminology of Lie groups the meaning is different: a connected non-commutative group is called "simple" if its Lie algebra is simple (1-03). The description of the problem does not define simple, but in the sense of abstract groups every SU(N) (N ≥ 2) would be excluded (centre ), so this book reads it in the sense of Lie groups. SU(N) (N ≥ 2) is simple in this sense (the list is in 1-04) Known, and the commutative U(1) is not included.
Compact. The same description states that with a compact gauge group and a compactified spacetime, Wilson's lattice approximation reduces the functional integral to a finite-dimensional integral. An element of G is put on each edge of the lattice and integrated over the whole of G (5-01), so it matters that the size of G is finite.
Representations. The same description says that in the theory of the strong force (QCD) the gauge group is SU(3), and quarks transform in the fundamental representation (this chapter's defining representation). The gauge field takes values in the Lie algebra of G. Under transformations that apply the same element at each point it transforms in the adjoint representation (1-04), and under general gauge transformations an extra term is added (3-02). The field strength transforms in the adjoint representation. The pure Yang–Mills theory the problem treats has no quarks, only the gauge field (3-07). Lattice models with G a finite group are treated in 5-10.
Next is 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras: the "second-order mismatch" is extracted as the commutator of the infinitesimal part of the group.
What this chapter can say
| Item | What is said | What is not said |
|---|---|---|
| Definition of a group, and examples | Definition and examples. The table of Computed | The general theory of groups |
| SO(3) | The outline of the proof that an axis exists. The numbers of the mismatch Computed | The reason it becomes (the commutator) is in 1-03 |
| Double cover | That ρ is a homomorphism to SO(3) with kernel . by formula for the z axis, numerically for general n Computed | A proof by formula for general n Known |
| Loops in SO(3) | An explanation, by figure and by lifting, that the 360° loop does not shrink and the 720° loop does | A complete proof that the fundamental group is (the path lifting theorem) Known |
| Representations | Why representations of U(1) are labelled by integers. The sign of at 360° Computed | The classification of irreducible representations of SU(2) and a proof of complete reducibility Known. Quantisation of charge is physics Physics |
| Yang–Mills | How to read the conditions on the group in the problem statement (compact, simple) | Shows nothing about the mass gap or the construction of the theory |
Sources and reproduction
| Item | Kind | Source / tool |
|---|---|---|
| The problem statement, replacing U(1) by G, QCD and the fundamental representation, finite-dimensional integrals on the lattice. That simple is not defined | Primary source (text checked) | A. Jaffe, E. Witten, “Quantum Yang–Mills Theory”, the Clay Mathematics Institute's description of the problem (PDF on the Institute's website; no date given; bibliographic details in the source table of 0-03) |
| Definition of compactness, the two-to-one SU(2) → SO(3), that SU(2) is simply connected and the universal cover of SO(3), complete reducibility (Prop. 5.17, using an invariant measure on the group), simplicity of abstract groups (note to Exercise 13 of Chapter 1), simplicity of Lie algebras (beginning of Chapter 7), | Known (text checked) | B. C. Hall, “An Elementary Introduction to Groups and Representations”, arXiv:math-ph/0005032 (2000) |
| The model of SO(3) as a ball of radius π with antipodal points of its surface glued, the fundamental group , that the loop shrinks | Known (text checked) | A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press (2002). In the version made public by the author, §3.D (), Example 1.43 (), Prop. 1.14 (, ) |
| "Simple" for Lie groups (connected, non-commutative, Lie algebra simple) | A terminological convention of this book | The definitions for abstract groups and Lie algebras were checked in Hall's notes above. A textbook stating this convention explicitly for Lie groups has not been checked |
| Quantisation of charge and compactness of the gauge group | Bibliographic data only (title and abstract) | C. N. Yang, “Charge Quantization, Compactness of the Gauge Group, and Flux Quantization”, Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 2360 |
| The table of ( for 18/36), , the checks of the double cover, the signs and characters of (m = 0–6) | Computed on this machine | Python 3.12, NumPy 1.26. Compositions of permutations, products of rotation matrices, 20,000 uniform U on and 2,000 pairs (θ, n), representation matrices on homogeneous polynomials (maximum deviation from the homomorphism property 5.8×10⁻¹⁵) |
| Figures 1–4 | Figures | Plain JavaScript. Figure 1 uses a precomputed table; Figures 2–4 compute the formulas for rotations and cos and sin on the spot |
← 1-01 Vector spaces and linear mapsContents1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras →