The whole book Contents and reading orders
- Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
- 0-01 How to read this book
- 0-02 One picture
- 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
- 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
- Part 1 Mathematical preparation
- 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
- 1-02 What a group is
- 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
- 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
- 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
- 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
- 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
- 1-08 Probability and measure
- 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
- 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
- 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
- 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
- Part 2 Physical preparation
- 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
- 2-02 The idea of a field
- 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
- 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
- 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
- 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
- 2-07 The idea of the path integral
- 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
- 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
- 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
- Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
- 3-01 The gauge principle
- 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
- 3-03 The action and the equations
- 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
- 3-05 Instantons and topology
- 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
- 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
- Part 4 Quantisation
- 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
- 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
- 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
- 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
- 4-05 The algebra of divergences
- 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
- 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
- 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
- 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
- 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
- 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
- 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
- Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
- 5-01 Wilson's lattice
- 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
- 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
- 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
- 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
- 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
- 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
- 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
- 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
- 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
- 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
- Part 6 Constructive field theory
- 6-01 What constructive field theory is
- 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
- 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
- 6-04 The cluster expansion
- 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
- 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
- 6-07 Four dimensions
- 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
- 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
- 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
- 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
- 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
- Part 7 From the side of physics
- 7-01 How physics sees it
- 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
- 7-03 The string picture
- 7-04 Large N
- 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
- 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
- 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
- 7-08 Holography
- 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
- 7-10 Back to four dimensions
- 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
- 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
- 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
- Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
- 8-01 How to read the dictionary
- 8-02 Dictionary A
- 8-03 Dictionary B
- 8-04 Dictionary C
- 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
- Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
- 9-01 How far the world has come
- 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
- 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
- 9-04 The list of open tasks
- 9-05 Common misconceptions
- Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
- 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
- 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
- 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
- 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
- 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
- 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
- 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
- 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
- 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
- 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
- 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
- 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
- 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
- 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
- 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
- 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
- 10-16 What is not claimed
- 10-17 Insights and small questions
- Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
- 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
- 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
- 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
- 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
- 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
- 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
- 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
- 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
- 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
- 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
- Appendices
- A-01 Table of notation
- A-02 Glossary
- A-03 Guide to the literature
- A-04 Lean and machine checking
- A-05 How this book was made
- A-06 Index of assumptions
How extra dimensions become invisible — waves on a small circle look like a tower of heavy particles
What this chapter shows — That extra dimensions being invisible means that fluctuations in those directions become a sequence of heavy particles (the KK tower), which cannot be produced at low energy. That the lowest rung of the tower is the first eigenvalue of the Laplacian, bounded by the diameter when the curvature is non-negative (Zhong–Yang). Two ways of hiding, Calabi–Yau and branes, and the experimental lower bounds.
Prerequisite chapters — 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions. We use 2-02 §06, 2-05 §08 and 1-10 §07. Fourier series and the Rayleigh quotient are written on the spot, and the metric, the Laplacian, Ricci curvature and the Einstein equations are defined on the spot as far as they are used.
Said first — Whether the real world has extra dimensions is not known, and the experimental numbers are lower bounds. The gap of the KK tower comes from the internal space being small, and is a different thing from the mass gap of Yang–Mills (which arises from interaction on ). This site shows neither the mass gap nor the construction of the continuum limit.
- What "seeing" means — the resolution is ħc/E
- A field on a circle — one field becomes a tower
- The lowest rung of the tower — the first eigenvalue and the diameter (the minimum of metric, Laplacian and Ricci curvature)
- Kaluza and Klein — charge is momentum
- The six dimensions of strings — Calabi–Yau
- Confining to a brane — ADD and RS (Detour: extra dimensions without a gap)
- Experimental lower bounds — Newton's law and colliders
- Back to Yang–Mills — the KK gap is not the mass gap
What "seeing" means — the resolution is ħc/E
To see, in physics, is to collide particles and examine how they bounce off. To resolve a structure of size needs a probe with wavelength shorter than , that is, high energy (2-05).
1 TeV gives m, the LHC collision energy of 13.6 TeV gives m, and the Planck mass GeV gives m Computed. From here on we set (2-04 §08). As a metaphor, a garden hose seen from afar is a line, but up close the direction going around it becomes visible. More precisely, what this chapter says is that "fluctuations along a small circle need high energy".
A field on a circle — one field becomes a tower
Consider the five-dimensional spacetime with a circle of radius attached to each point of space (the circle coordinate identified with ). A massless scalar field obeys the wave equation (2-02), and since it is periodic in it can be expanded in a Fourier series (1-11).
Substituting, is replaced by , and the equation splits coefficient by coefficient.
This is the Klein–Gordon equation of mass (2-02 §06). One five-dimensional field looks, in four dimensions, like a massless zero mode and an infinite sequence of fields of mass . This is the Kaluza–Klein tower (KK tower) Known. The PDG writes 'At energies smaller than 1/R, the KK modes can be neglected, leaving the zero-mode action'. The couplings of the zero mode are diluted; for a quartic interaction (PDG formula 84.6), weaker the larger the circle. is the fundamental mass scale of the five-dimensional theory, put in to make dimensionless.
For a product of circles (a torus with radii ), each tuple of integers gives a field with . Figure 1 is the case of two circles.
| 5 | 10 | 30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 (12.6) | 81 (78.5) | 317 (314.2) | 2821 (2827.4) |
| 0.1 | 5 (1.3) | 11 (7.9) | 23 (31.4) | 267 (282.7) |
| One circle | 5 | 11 | 21 | 61 |
ComputedThe numbers of Table 1 and Figure 1 were computed on this machine (the figure is drawn on the spot from formula (3)). If JavaScript is disabled, see Table 1.
The row is the same as one circle for , and the thin direction first appears at . The count grows as to the power of (the number of visible extra dimensions).
The lowest rung of the tower — the first eigenvalue and the diameter
The lowest rung can be restated as an inequality. For a periodic function with mean 0, , Parseval's identity gives (Wirtinger's inequality) Known
This is the simplest example of the Poincaré inequality of 2-05 §08 and 1-10 §07, and the best constant is the reciprocal of the gap (the square of the lowest rung of the tower).
Measuring lengths — metric, diameter, Laplacian
To replace the circle by a general compact manifold (1-05) we need a way of measuring lengths. An inner product given on each tangent space (1-05 §06), varying smoothly from point to point, is called a metric. It is a way of measuring lengths and angles. With a metric we can measure the lengths of curves, and the length of the shortest path joining two points is their distance. The maximum of that distance over all pairs of points is the diameter (for a circle of circumference , ; the of this chapter is the diameter, not the spacetime dimension of other chapters). The size of the gradient of a function, , is also fixed by the metric, and the operator with is called the Laplacian (the Laplace–Beltrami operator). On a flat torus, in coordinates measured by length, .
If spacetime is the unwarped product and the field is a scalar, expanding in the eigenfunctions of (eigenvalues ) gives . The first KK mass is the minimum of the Rayleigh quotient (1-10 §06).
For form or spinor fields, or in warped backgrounds, it becomes the eigenvalue of another operator (the Hodge Laplacian, the Dirac operator and so on). In this chapter we restate "extra dimensions are invisible" as the Poincaré inequality on the part without the zero mode, .
When the diameter suffices — Ricci curvature
Multiplying the metric by (multiplying all lengths by ) multiplies by , so shrinking raises the tower. That "small" may be measured by the diameter alone is a theorem when the Ricci curvature is non-negative.
Ricci curvature, as a metaphor, is the average of how much a bundle of geodesics (locally shortest paths) leaving a point around one direction gathers together as it goes. On a sphere it is positive (meridians gather at the poles), on a flat torus 0, on a saddle-shaped surface negative (they spread). More precisely, for a direction of length 1, it is the sum of the bending (sectional curvature) of the sections spanned by and the directions orthogonal to , which is times the average. In two dimensions there is a single section, so it is the same as the Gauss curvature. The bending itself is the curvature in the sense of 1-07 §05 (the discrepancy after going round a small loop) when the bundle of tangent spaces is given the connection fixed by the metric. is the condition that this sum is at least 0 at every point in every direction Known.
| Ratio | Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Circle | 1 | Square torus | 2 |
| Rectangular torus 1×0.2 | 1.04 | Hexagonal torus | 1.7778 |
| Rectangular torus 1×0.05 | 1.0025 | Spheres , , | 2, 3, 6 |
The tori were computed numerically and agree to 5 digits with the closed forms (rectangle , hexagon ). The spheres are known values.
For thin tori the ratio approaches 1 but does not reach it. The curvature condition cannot be dropped. Join two spheres by a thin neck and put into (5) a function that is on one and on the other: the numerator comes only from the neck, so making the neck thinner leaves the diameter nearly unchanged while the Rayleigh quotient becomes as small as we like. At the base of the neck the curvature becomes strongly negative, and fails. This is a well-known example Known.
Kaluza and Klein — charge is momentum around the circle
The idea of extra dimensions goes back to Kaluza and Klein in the 1920s (the introduction of the PDG). Five-dimensional spacetime also has a metric in the sense of §03 (in spacetime, what corresponds to the inner product at each point has, like the of 2-04, exactly one negative sign, and it may vary from point to point). Its 15 components split into 10 for the four-dimensional metric , 4 for a vector and 1 for a scalar . Rewriting formulas 5 and 8 of the review by Overduin–Wesson with signature givesNote 1
The Einstein equations are the equations of gravity that tie the bending (curvature) of the metric to the energy of matter. Here we do not go into their content and use only the counting of components. If no component depends on , the five-dimensional Einstein equations split into 10+4+1=15 four-dimensional equations (ibid. formula 6). Setting constant, among the 15 the equations for the metric and vector components become the four-dimensional Einstein equations and Maxwell's equations (ibid. formula 7) Known. But the remaining scalar equation is compatible with constant only when (pointed out by Jordan and Thiry, ibid. §3.4). The change of coordinates induces , and the gauge transformation (2-03) appears as a re-choice of the coordinate in the direction of the circle.
Klein (1926) connected Kaluza's theory with wave mechanics (abstract) and made the circle small. The momentum of the -th component in (2) becomes, under (7), a charge (ibid. formula 25, ).
Charge is restricted to integer multiples of (the title of Klein's short communication of the same year is 'The Atomicity of Electricity as a Quantum Theory Law'). As a metaphor, charge is momentum around an invisible circle; more precisely, it is the momentum times a constant fixed by convention.
Setting () gives m (about 23 times the Planck length), and the first rung of the tower is GeV, about times the electron mass Computed. Overduin–Wesson, taking the radius as the Planck length, estimate the discrepancy at about 22 orders of magnitude, and write that it 'played a large role in the abandonment of five-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory'. If the internal space has a non-abelian symmetry, non-abelian gauge fields can come out (7-07) Physics.
The six dimensions of strings — curling up into Calabi–Yau
Spacetime in superstring theory is ten-dimensional (7-05 §06), so to make it look four-dimensional a six-dimensional internal space is needed. Candelas–Horowitz–Strominger–Witten (1985) studied vacua leaving one supersymmetry in four dimensions, and wrote in the abstract 'This condition permits only a few possibilities'. The satisfying the condition is said to be a Kähler manifold with Ricci curvature 0 (a complex manifold whose metric and complex structure mesh) whose holonomy (1-07) lies in SU(3): a Calabi–Yau manifold Physics.
That such metrics exist is a mathematical theorem. Yau announced in 1977 'We announce a proof of Calabi's conjectures on the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold' (the paper is from 1978). As a consequence, a compact Kähler manifold with vanishing first Chern class has a Ricci-flat Kähler metric Known. If it is Ricci-flat, (6) applies, so the scalar KK tower on a Calabi–Yau of diameter starts above .
On the size, the introduction of the PDG writes 'The extra dimensions were supposed to be compactified at a scale close to the Planck scale, and thus not testable experimentally in the near future'. The shape affects the particle content (the model of CHSW has 'an E6 gauge group with four standard generations of fermions').
Confining to a brane — ADD and RS
In 1998, Arkani-Hamed–Dimopoulos–Dvali (ADD) proposed a way of hiding in which the fields of the Standard Model are confined to a three-dimensional membrane (a 3-brane) and only gravity spreads into dimensions. Since they can be probed only by gravity, the extra dimensions may be large. The abstract reads 'The observed weakness of gravity on distances ≳ 1 mm is due to the existence of n ≥ 2 new compact spatial dimensions large compared to the weak scale' Physics. The weakness of gravity is the same dilution as the of §02, and the fundamental scale and the reduced Planck mass GeV are related by (PDG formula 84.10)
| TeV | TeV | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | m | m |
| 2 | m | m |
| 6 | m | m |
is the size of the solar system, 'clearly ruled out' (PDG), and gives 0.5 mm. The next year, 1999, Randall–Sundrum (RS) used a slice of five-dimensional anti-de Sitter space (PDG formula 84.16).
Anti-de Sitter space is a spacetime of constant negative curvature (7-08). The metric (10) is the slice of that spacetime with curvature radius . Scales at the end are redshifted by a factor . The PDG writes that and give the TeV; at , TeV, and changing from 10 to 12 moves it from 55 TeV to 0.1 TeV Computed. Making a large ratio with an exponential resembles dimensional transmutation (7-01). More precisely, in RS the exponent comes from geometry (), in dimensional transmutation from the running of the coupling (). The view that connects warped extra dimensions with strongly coupled four-dimensional theories is AdS/CFT (7-08), at the level of a conjecture Physics.
Detour: extra dimensions without a gap
A subsection you may skip.
The paper of RS from the same year argued that four-dimensional gravity can be reproduced even if the extra dimension is infinitely long: 'even without a gap in the Kaluza-Klein spectrum, four-dimensional Newtonian and general relativistic gravity is reproduced to more than adequate precision' Physics. A gap in the tower is not essential for invisibility.
Experimental lower bounds — Newton's law and colliders
Deviations from Newton's law are by custom expressed in Yukawa form (PDG formula 84.12).
The exchange of a field of mass gives a Yukawa potential , and one term is added for each KK mode. In a scalar (Newtonian) model, summing the whole tower of (radius ) gives
is the number of fields on the first rung; for the sum is . For , : the law of a space of dimensions. For the graviton the coefficient changes. The KK modes of the graviton are massive spin-2 fields, and the contribution of their polarisations is said to multiply the coefficient of the first rung by 4/3; the PDG takes, for a two-dimensional torus, (4/3 of the 4 in (12)) and Physics. (12) is not the formula for gravity itself but a model for seeing how summing the tower produces a Yukawa-type deviation.
| 1 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.02 | 2.164 | 1.000091 |
| 2 | 628.3 | 6.507 | 1.000184 |
| 6 | 3721 | 1.000593 |
ComputedThe numbers of Figure 2 and Table 4 were computed on this machine (sums over ; agrees with to 12 digits, and with the integral approximation to 5 digits). If JavaScript is disabled, see Table 4.
That the deviation vanishes as for is the quantitative content of "invisible".
| What was searched for | Lower bound |
|---|---|
| Inverse-square law (torsion balance) | For , µm, TeV |
| Supernova SN1987A / neutron stars | For , / 1700 TeV |
| Graviton emission at the LHC (ATLAS / CMS) | –11.2 / 5.5–10.7 TeV (–6) |
| The lightest KK graviton of RS | ATLAS 4.5 TeV (), CMS 2.2–5.6 TeV |
| Gauge fields propagating in flat extra dimensions | TeV (a reinterpretation by ATLAS; m), TeV from LEP2 |
| All fields propagate (UED) | –1.5 TeV. The minimal model is excluded together with dark matter |
One of the inverse-square-law experiments (Tan et al. 2016) confirms down to µm (abstract). The observed gauge fields are four-dimensional down to about m, and gravity follows the inverse-square law down to some tens of µm. Extra dimensions have not been found, but neither has it been shown that there are none.
Back to Yang–Mills — the KK gap is not the mass gap
The KK gap is not the mass gap. The lowest rung of the tower is a gap that comes only from the internal space being compact; free fields have it too, and the zero mode has no gap. It is the same computation as the gap of a free field in a box (2-02 §06, 2-05 §06). What the prize problem asks for is a gap arising from interaction on , which has no compact directions (4-11), and Jaffe–Witten write 'no present ideas point the direction to establish the existence of a mass gap that is uniform in the volume'.
Do not mix the two kinds of extra dimensions. The lower bounds of §07 concern real extra dimensions. The extra dimensions of holographic models (7-08, 7-09) (the radial direction of anti-de Sitter space, , the auxiliary circle of Witten's model) are tools of a dual description or of regularisation, and are not claimed to be real dimensions.
Within the models the tower is visible. In models that read the gap from geometry, the KK tower of the extra dimensions comes at the same height as the glueballs (in the Maldacena–Núñez model of supersymmetric Yang–Mills, if the gravity approximation is valid, 'comparable to the masses of Kaluza Klein states'; the authors also write that quantising the string on this background might allow the KK states to be separated) Physics. Removing the tower requires shrinking the extra dimensions, and then the coupling becomes weak (in four dimensions, because of asymptotic freedom), which is the opposite side from the region where the computation works (Csáki et al., of Witten's three-dimensional model: 'This is the opposite of the limit that is required for the supergravity description to be valid'). The order of limits is treated in 7-10.
What can be said as a theorem about "invisible" is only about linear fluctuations on a fixed internal space ((4)–(6)). Within the range we searched we found no result justifying that the tower separates in an interacting theory, in particular in the limit that returns to four dimensions.
Note 1 Overduin–Wesson take the four-dimensional signature and set (formula 8). (7) is aligned with this book's signature , and is the same value. Back to text
What this chapter can say
| What is said | What is not said |
|---|---|
| Known(2)–(8), Yau's theorem. | General lower bounds for towers in warped backgrounds or of forms and spinors. The consistency of keeping constant (the scalar equation requires ). |
| ComputedTables 1–5, Figures 1 and 2, Klein's radius, reproducing the numbers of the PDG with (9). | (12) is a scalar model. The 16/3 for the graviton is quoted from the PDG; the origin of the factor 4/3 is not derived in this chapter. |
| PhysicsThe Calabi–Yau condition, ADD and RS, non-abelian gauge fields, the height of the towers in the models. | Whether real extra dimensions exist. That the towers of the models separate in the limit returning to four dimensions. This site shows neither the mass gap nor the construction of the continuum limit. |
Sources and reproduction
| Item | Kind | Source / tools |
|---|---|---|
| (2)(3), (9)–(11), 16/3, Table 5, quotations | Known, Physics | Z. Demiragli, A. Pomarol, "84. Extra Dimensions" (PDG, PRD 110 (2024) 030001, revised August 2025). Text checked. |
| (7)(8), Kaluza, Klein | Known | J. M. Overduin, P. S. Wesson, Phys. Rep. 283 (1997) 303, gr-qc/9805018 §3, §4 (text checked; formulas 5–8 and 25, the condition for constant in §3.4). Th. Kaluza, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (1921) 966 (bibliographic data only). O. Klein, Z. Phys. 37 (1926) 895 (abstract checked); Nature 118 (1926) 516 (bibliographic data only). |
| (6) | Known | J. Q. Zhong, H. C. Yang, Sci. Sinica Ser. A 27 (1984) 1265 (bibliographic data only; the claim follows the survey by Ling–Lu, whose bibliographic data is not checked). F. Hang, X. Wang, IMRN 2007, rnm064, doi:10.1093/imrn/rnm064 (bibliographic data only). |
| The Calabi–Yau condition | Physics | P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, E. Witten, NPB 258 (1985) 46. Abstract checked (the term Calabi–Yau and SU(3) holonomy not checked in the text). |
| Yau's theorem | Known | S.-T. Yau, PNAS 74 (1977) 1798 (abstract checked); CPAM 31 (1978) 339 (bibliographic data only). |
| ADD, RS, the inverse-square law | Physics | N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, PLB 429 (1998) 263. L. Randall, R. Sundrum, PRL 83 (1999) 3370; ibid. 4690. W.-H. Tan et al., PRL 116 (2016) 131101. Abstracts checked. |
| Quotations in §08 | Known, Physics | A. Jaffe, E. Witten, "Quantum Yang–Mills Theory" (the Clay problem description; the PDF published by Clay; text checked). J. Maldacena, C. Núñez, PRL 86 (2001) 588, arXiv:hep-th/0008001 (abstract checked). C. Csáki, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz, J. Terning, JHEP 9901 (1999) 017, arXiv:hep-th/9806021 (text checked). |
| Tables, figures, numbers | Computed | Python 3 (numpy) on this machine: kk_count.py, zhong_yang.py, units_klein.py, add_rs.py, newton_kk.py (the values embedded in Figure 2 are the same computation output to 4 decimal places). |
Next chapter to read: 7-07 Where gauge fields come from — extracting gauge groups from branes and geometry.
← 7-05 String theory and extra dimensionsContents7-07 Where gauge fields come from →