computo ergo sum

2026-10-01 · chapter Yang–Mills and the mass gapPart 7 From the side of physicsextra dimensions, Kaluza–Klein

The whole book Contents and reading orders
  1. Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
  2. 0-01 How to read this book
  3. 0-02 One picture
  4. 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
  5. 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
  6. Part 1 Mathematical preparation
  7. 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
  8. 1-02 What a group is
  9. 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
  10. 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
  11. 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
  12. 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
  13. 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
  14. 1-08 Probability and measure
  15. 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
  16. 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
  17. 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
  18. 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
  19. Part 2 Physical preparation
  20. 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
  21. 2-02 The idea of a field
  22. 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
  23. 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
  24. 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
  25. 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
  26. 2-07 The idea of the path integral
  27. 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
  28. 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
  29. 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
  30. Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
  31. 3-01 The gauge principle
  32. 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
  33. 3-03 The action and the equations
  34. 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
  35. 3-05 Instantons and topology
  36. 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
  37. 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
  38. Part 4 Quantisation
  39. 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
  40. 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
  41. 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
  42. 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
  43. 4-05 The algebra of divergences
  44. 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
  45. 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
  46. 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
  47. 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
  48. 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
  49. 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
  50. 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
  51. Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
  52. 5-01 Wilson's lattice
  53. 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
  54. 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
  55. 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
  56. 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
  57. 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
  58. 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
  59. 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
  60. 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
  61. 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
  62. 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
  63. Part 6 Constructive field theory
  64. 6-01 What constructive field theory is
  65. 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
  66. 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
  67. 6-04 The cluster expansion
  68. 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
  69. 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
  70. 6-07 Four dimensions
  71. 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
  72. 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
  73. 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
  74. 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
  75. 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
  76. Part 7 From the side of physics
  77. 7-01 How physics sees it
  78. 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
  79. 7-03 The string picture
  80. 7-04 Large N
  81. 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
  82. 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
  83. 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
  84. 7-08 Holography
  85. 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
  86. 7-10 Back to four dimensions
  87. 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
  88. 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
  89. 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
  90. Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
  91. 8-01 How to read the dictionary
  92. 8-02 Dictionary A
  93. 8-03 Dictionary B
  94. 8-04 Dictionary C
  95. 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
  96. Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
  97. 9-01 How far the world has come
  98. 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
  99. 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
  100. 9-04 The list of open tasks
  101. 9-05 Common misconceptions
  102. Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
  103. 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
  104. 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
  105. 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
  106. 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
  107. 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
  108. 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
  109. 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
  110. 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
  111. 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
  112. 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
  113. 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
  114. 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
  115. 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
  116. 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
  117. 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
  118. 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
  119. 10-16 What is not claimed
  120. 10-17 Insights and small questions
  121. Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
  122. 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
  123. 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
  124. 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
  125. 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
  126. 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
  127. 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
  128. 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
  129. 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
  130. 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
  131. 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
  132. Appendices
  133. A-01 Table of notation
  134. A-02 Glossary
  135. A-03 Guide to the literature
  136. A-04 Lean and machine checking
  137. A-05 How this book was made
  138. A-06 Index of assumptions

How extra dimensions become invisible — waves on a small circle look like a tower of heavy particles

What this chapter shows — That extra dimensions being invisible means that fluctuations in those directions become a sequence of heavy particles (the KK tower), which cannot be produced at low energy. That the lowest rung of the tower is the first eigenvalue of the Laplacian, bounded by the diameter when the curvature is non-negative (Zhong–Yang). Two ways of hiding, Calabi–Yau and branes, and the experimental lower bounds.

Prerequisite chapters — 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions. We use 2-02 §06, 2-05 §08 and 1-10 §07. Fourier series and the Rayleigh quotient are written on the spot, and the metric, the Laplacian, Ricci curvature and the Einstein equations are defined on the spot as far as they are used.

Said first — Whether the real world has extra dimensions is not known, and the experimental numbers are lower bounds. The gap of the KK tower comes from the internal space being small, and is a different thing from the mass gap of Yang–Mills (which arises from interaction on R4\mathbb R^4). This site shows neither the mass gap nor the construction of the continuum limit.

The order of this chapter
  1. What "seeing" means — the resolution is ħc/E
  2. A field on a circle — one field becomes a tower
  3. The lowest rung of the tower — the first eigenvalue and the diameter (the minimum of metric, Laplacian and Ricci curvature)
  4. Kaluza and Klein — charge is momentum
  5. The six dimensions of strings — Calabi–Yau
  6. Confining to a brane — ADD and RS (Detour: extra dimensions without a gap)
  7. Experimental lower bounds — Newton's law and colliders
  8. Back to Yang–Mills — the KK gap is not the mass gap

01

What "seeing" means — the resolution is ħc/E

To see, in physics, is to collide particles and examine how they bounce off. To resolve a structure of size ℓ\ell needs a probe with wavelength shorter than ℓ\ell, that is, high energy (2-05).

ℓ≈ℏcE,ℏc=197.327 MeV⋅fm(1)\ell \approx \frac{\hbar c}{E},\qquad \hbar c = 197.327\ \mathrm{MeV\cdot fm} \tag{1}

1 TeV gives 2.0×10−192.0\times10^{-19} m, the LHC collision energy of 13.6 TeV gives 1.5×10−201.5\times10^{-20} m, and the Planck mass 1.22×10191.22\times10^{19} GeV gives 1.6×10−351.6\times10^{-35} m Computed. From here on we set ℏ=c=1\hbar=c=1 (2-04 §08). As a metaphor, a garden hose seen from afar is a line, but up close the direction going around it becomes visible. More precisely, what this chapter says is that "fluctuations along a small circle need high energy".

02

A field on a circle — one field becomes a tower

Consider the five-dimensional spacetime R1,3×S1\mathbb R^{1,3}\times S^1 with a circle of radius RR attached to each point of space (the circle coordinate yy identified with y+2πRy+2\pi R). A massless scalar field Φ(x,y)\Phi(x,y) obeys the wave equation (2-02), and since it is periodic in yy it can be expanded in a Fourier series (1-11).

(∂t2−∇2−∂y2)Φ=0,Φ(x,y)=12πR∑n∈Zϕn(x) einy/R(2)\big(\partial_t^2-\nabla^2-\partial_y^2\big)\Phi=0,\qquad \Phi(x,y)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi R}}\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}\phi_n(x)\,e^{iny/R} \tag{2}

Substituting, ∂y2\partial_y^2 is replaced by −n2/R2-n^2/R^2, and the equation splits coefficient by coefficient.

(∂t2−∇2+n2R2)ϕn=0,mn=∣n∣R(3)\Big(\partial_t^2-\nabla^2+\frac{n^2}{R^2}\Big)\phi_n=0,\qquad m_n=\frac{|n|}{R} \tag{3}

This is the Klein–Gordon equation of mass mnm_n (2-02 §06). One five-dimensional field looks, in four dimensions, like a massless zero mode ϕ0\phi_0 and an infinite sequence of fields of mass 1/R,2/R,…1/R,2/R,\dots. This is the Kaluza–Klein tower (KK tower) Known. The PDG writes 'At energies smaller than 1/R, the KK modes can be neglected, leaving the zero-mode action'. The couplings of the zero mode are diluted; for a quartic interaction λ4=λ5/(2πRM5)\lambda_4=\lambda_5/(2\pi RM_5) (PDG formula 84.6), weaker the larger the circle. M5M_5 is the fundamental mass scale of the five-dimensional theory, put in to make λ5\lambda_5 dimensionless.

For a product of δ\delta circles (a torus TδT^\delta with radii RiR_i), each tuple of integers n⃗\vec n gives a field with m2=∑ini2/Ri2m^2=\sum_i n_i^2/R_i^2. Figure 1 is the case of two circles.

Figure 1 The KK tower of two circles (R1≥R2R_1\ge R_2). Each point is a four-dimensional field (horizontal n1n_1, vertical the mass). Varying EE (dashed) and the ratio of radii changes the fields below EE
E·R₁ = 3, R₂/R₁ = 0.3, fields below E: 7
Table 1 The number of four-dimensional fields of mass at most EE (including the zero mode). In brackets the Weyl estimate πR1R2E2\pi R_1R_2E^2 (the area 4π2R1R24\pi^2R_1R_2 times E2/4πE^2/4\pi; the detour of 1-10)
R2/R1R_2/R_1ER1=2ER_1=251030
113 (12.6)81 (78.5)317 (314.2)2821 (2827.4)
0.15 (1.3)11 (7.9)23 (31.4)267 (282.7)
One circle5112161

ComputedThe numbers of Table 1 and Figure 1 were computed on this machine (the figure is drawn on the spot from formula (3)). If JavaScript is disabled, see Table 1.

The row R2/R1=0.1R_2/R_1=0.1 is the same as one circle for ER1≤5ER_1\le5, and the thin direction first appears at E≳1/R2E\gtrsim1/R_2. The count grows as EE to the power of (the number of visible extra dimensions).

03

The lowest rung of the tower — the first eigenvalue and the diameter

The lowest rung 1/R1/R can be restated as an inequality. For a periodic function with mean 0, f=∑n≠0cneiny/Rf=\sum_{n\ne0}c_ne^{iny/R}, Parseval's identity gives (Wirtinger's inequality) Known

∫02πR∣f′∣2 dy=2πR∑n≠0n2R2∣cn∣2 ≥ 1R2∫02πR∣f∣2 dy(4)\int_0^{2\pi R}|f'|^2\,dy=2\pi R\sum_{n\ne0}\frac{n^2}{R^2}|c_n|^2\ \ge\ \frac{1}{R^2}\int_0^{2\pi R}|f|^2\,dy \tag{4}

This is the simplest example of the Poincaré inequality of 2-05 §08 and 1-10 §07, and the best constant R2R^2 is the reciprocal of the gap 1/R21/R^2 (the square of the lowest rung of the tower).

Measuring lengths — metric, diameter, Laplacian

To replace the circle by a general compact manifold KK (1-05) we need a way of measuring lengths. An inner product given on each tangent space (1-05 §06), varying smoothly from point to point, is called a metric. It is a way of measuring lengths and angles. With a metric we can measure the lengths of curves, and the length of the shortest path joining two points is their distance. The maximum of that distance over all pairs of points is the diameter dd (for a circle of circumference 2πR2\pi R, d=πRd=\pi R; the dd of this chapter is the diameter, not the spacetime dimension dd of other chapters). The size of the gradient of a function, ∣∇f∣|\nabla f|, is also fixed by the metric, and the operator −ΔK-\Delta_K with ∫K∣∇f∣2=∫Kfˉ (−ΔKf)\int_K|\nabla f|^2=\int_K\bar f\,(-\Delta_Kf) is called the Laplacian (the Laplace–Beltrami operator). On a flat torus, in coordinates yiy_i measured by length, −ΔK=−∑i∂2/∂yi2-\Delta_K=-\sum_i\partial^2/\partial y_i^2.

If spacetime is the unwarped product R1,3×K\mathbb R^{1,3}\times K and the field is a scalar, expanding in the eigenfunctions of −ΔK-\Delta_K (eigenvalues 0=λ0<λ1≤⋯0=\lambda_0<\lambda_1\le\cdots) gives mj2=λjm_j^2=\lambda_j. The first KK mass is the minimum of the Rayleigh quotient (1-10 §06).

m12=λ1(K)=inf⁡{∫K∣∇f∣2∫K∣f∣2 : ∫Kf=0, f≠0}(5)m_1^2=\lambda_1(K)=\inf\Big\{\frac{\int_K|\nabla f|^2}{\int_K|f|^2}\ :\ \int_K f=0,\ f\ne0\Big\} \tag{5}

For form or spinor fields, or in warped backgrounds, it becomes the eigenvalue of another operator (the Hodge Laplacian, the Dirac operator and so on). In this chapter we restate "extra dimensions are invisible" as the Poincaré inequality on the part without the zero mode, ∫∣∇f∣2≥λ1∫∣f∣2\int|\nabla f|^2\ge\lambda_1\int|f|^2.

When the diameter suffices — Ricci curvature

Multiplying the metric by s2s^2 (multiplying all lengths by ss) multiplies λ1\lambda_1 by s−2s^{-2}, so shrinking raises the tower. That "small" may be measured by the diameter dd alone is a theorem when the Ricci curvature is non-negative.

Ricci curvature, as a metaphor, is the average of how much a bundle of geodesics (locally shortest paths) leaving a point around one direction gathers together as it goes. On a sphere it is positive (meridians gather at the poles), on a flat torus 0, on a saddle-shaped surface negative (they spread). More precisely, for a direction vv of length 1, it is the sum Ric⁡(v,v)=∑iK(v,ei)\operatorname{Ric}(v,v)=\sum_iK(v,e_i) of the bending (sectional curvature) of the n−1n-1 sections spanned by vv and the directions eie_i orthogonal to vv, which is n−1n-1 times the average. In two dimensions there is a single section, so it is the same as the Gauss curvature. The bending itself is the curvature in the sense of 1-07 §05 (the discrepancy after going round a small loop) when the bundle of tangent spaces is given the connection fixed by the metric. Ric⁡K≥0\operatorname{Ric}_K\ge0 is the condition that this sum is at least 0 at every point in every direction Known.

Ric⁡K≥0 ⟹ λ1(K) ≥ π2d2(Zhong–Yang; equality only for the circle: Hang–Wang)(6)\operatorname{Ric}_K\ge0\ \Longrightarrow\ \lambda_1(K)\ \ge\ \frac{\pi^2}{d^2}\qquad(\text{Zhong–Yang; equality only for the circle: Hang–Wang}) \tag{6}
Table 2 The ratio λ1d2/π2\lambda_1d^2/\pi^2. (6) says it is at least 1 Computed
KKRatioKKRatio
Circle1Square torus2
Rectangular torus 1×0.21.04Hexagonal torus1.7778
Rectangular torus 1×0.051.0025Spheres S2S^2, S3S^3, S6S^62, 3, 6

The tori were computed numerically and agree to 5 digits with the closed forms (rectangle 1+ρ21+\rho^2, hexagon 16/916/9). The spheres are known values.

For thin tori the ratio approaches 1 but does not reach it. The curvature condition cannot be dropped. Join two spheres by a thin neck and put into (5) a function that is +1+1 on one and −1-1 on the other: the numerator comes only from the neck, so making the neck thinner leaves the diameter nearly unchanged while the Rayleigh quotient becomes as small as we like. At the base of the neck the curvature becomes strongly negative, and Ric⁡≥0\operatorname{Ric}\ge0 fails. This is a well-known example Known.

04

Kaluza and Klein — charge is momentum around the circle

The idea of extra dimensions goes back to Kaluza and Klein in the 1920s (the introduction of the PDG). Five-dimensional spacetime also has a metric in the sense of §03 (in spacetime, what corresponds to the inner product at each point has, like the η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1)\eta=\operatorname{diag}(-1,1,1,1) of 2-04, exactly one negative sign, and it may vary from point to point). Its 15 components split into 10 for the four-dimensional metric gμνg_{\mu\nu}, 4 for a vector AμA_\mu and 1 for a scalar ϕ\phi. Rewriting formulas 5 and 8 of the review by Overduin–Wesson with signature (−,+,+,+,+)(-,+,+,+,+) givesNote 1

ds2=gμνdxμdxν+ϕ2(dy+κAμdxμ)2,κ=16πG(7)ds^2=g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+\phi^2\big(dy+\kappa A_\mu dx^\mu\big)^2,\qquad \kappa=\sqrt{16\pi G} \tag{7}

The Einstein equations are the equations of gravity that tie the bending (curvature) of the metric to the energy of matter. Here we do not go into their content and use only the counting of components. If no component depends on yy, the five-dimensional Einstein equations split into 10+4+1=15 four-dimensional equations (ibid. formula 6). Setting ϕ\phi constant, among the 15 the equations for the metric and vector components become the four-dimensional Einstein equations and Maxwell's equations (ibid. formula 7) Known. But the remaining scalar equation is compatible with ϕ=\phi= constant only when FμνFμν=0F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=0 (pointed out by Jordan and Thiry, ibid. §3.4). The change of coordinates y↦y+κλ(x)y\mapsto y+\kappa\lambda(x) induces Aμ↦Aμ−∂μλA_\mu\mapsto A_\mu-\partial_\mu\lambda, and the gauge transformation (2-03) appears as a re-choice of the coordinate in the direction of the circle.

Klein (1926) connected Kaluza's theory with wave mechanics (abstract) and made the circle small. The momentum n/Rn/R of the nn-th component in (2) becomes, under (7), a charge (ibid. formula 25, ϕ=1\phi=1).

qn=n16πGR,n∈Z(8)q_n=\frac{n\sqrt{16\pi G}}{R},\qquad n\in\mathbb Z \tag{8}

Charge is restricted to integer multiples of q1q_1 (the title of Klein's short communication of the same year is 'The Atomicity of Electricity as a Quantum Theory Law'). As a metaphor, charge is momentum around an invisible circle; more precisely, it is the momentum n/Rn/R times a constant κ\kappa fixed by convention.

Setting q1=eq_1=e (e2/4π=α≈1/137.036e^2/4\pi=\alpha\approx1/137.036) gives R=2ℓP/α≈3.8×10−34R=2\ell_P/\sqrt\alpha\approx3.8\times10^{-34} m (about 23 times the Planck length), and the first rung of the tower is 1/R≈5.2×10171/R\approx5.2\times10^{17} GeV, about 102110^{21} times the electron mass Computed. Overduin–Wesson, taking the radius as the Planck length, estimate the discrepancy at about 22 orders of magnitude, and write that it 'played a large role in the abandonment of five-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory'. If the internal space has a non-abelian symmetry, non-abelian gauge fields can come out (7-07) Physics.

05

The six dimensions of strings — curling up into Calabi–Yau

Spacetime in superstring theory is ten-dimensional (7-05 §06), so to make it look four-dimensional a six-dimensional internal space KK is needed. Candelas–Horowitz–Strominger–Witten (1985) studied vacua leaving one supersymmetry in four dimensions, and wrote in the abstract 'This condition permits only a few possibilities'. The KK satisfying the condition is said to be a Kähler manifold with Ricci curvature 0 (a complex manifold whose metric and complex structure mesh) whose holonomy (1-07) lies in SU(3): a Calabi–Yau manifold Physics.

That such metrics exist is a mathematical theorem. Yau announced in 1977 'We announce a proof of Calabi's conjectures on the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold' (the paper is from 1978). As a consequence, a compact Kähler manifold with vanishing first Chern class has a Ricci-flat Kähler metric Known. If it is Ricci-flat, (6) applies, so the scalar KK tower on a Calabi–Yau of diameter dd starts above π/d\pi/d.

On the size, the introduction of the PDG writes 'The extra dimensions were supposed to be compactified at a scale close to the Planck scale, and thus not testable experimentally in the near future'. The shape affects the particle content (the model of CHSW has 'an E6 gauge group with four standard generations of fermions').

06

Confining to a brane — ADD and RS

In 1998, Arkani-Hamed–Dimopoulos–Dvali (ADD) proposed a way of hiding in which the fields of the Standard Model are confined to a three-dimensional membrane (a 3-brane) and only gravity spreads into 4+δ4+\delta dimensions. Since they can be probed only by gravity, the extra dimensions may be large. The abstract reads 'The observed weakness of gravity on distances ≳ 1 mm is due to the existence of n ≥ 2 new compact spatial dimensions large compared to the weak scale' Physics. The weakness of gravity is the same dilution as the λ4\lambda_4 of §02, and the fundamental scale MDM_D and the reduced Planck mass MP≈2.4×1018M_P\approx2.4\times10^{18} GeV are related by (PDG formula 84.10)

MP2=RδMD 2+δ(9)M_P^2=R^\delta M_D^{\,2+\delta} \tag{9}
Table 3 RR fixed by (9) (reproducing the "10910^9 km, 0.5 mm, …, 0.1 MeV−1^{-1}" of PDG formula 84.11) Computed
δ\deltaMD=1M_D=1 TeVMD=4M_D=4 TeV
11.2×10121.2\times10^{12} m1.8×10101.8\times10^{10} m
24.8×10−44.8\times10^{-4} m3.0×10−53.0\times10^{-5} m
62.6×10−142.6\times10^{-14} m4.2×10−154.2\times10^{-15} m

δ=1\delta=1 is the size of the solar system, 'clearly ruled out' (PDG), and δ=2\delta=2 gives 0.5 mm. The next year, 1999, Randall–Sundrum (RS) used a slice of five-dimensional anti-de Sitter space (PDG formula 84.16).

ds2=e−2kyημνdxμdxν+dy2,0≤y≤πR(10)ds^2=e^{-2ky}\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+dy^2,\qquad 0\le y\le\pi R \tag{10}

Anti-de Sitter space is a spacetime of constant negative curvature (7-08). The metric (10) is the slice 0≤y≤πR0\le y\le\pi R of that spacetime with curvature radius 1/k1/k. Scales at the end y=πRy=\pi R are redshifted by a factor e−kπRe^{-k\pi R}. The PDG writes that k∼MPk\sim M_P and R≃11/kR\simeq11/k give the TeV; at kR=11kR=11, ke−kπR≈2.4ke^{-k\pi R}\approx2.4 TeV, and changing kRkR from 10 to 12 moves it from 55 TeV to 0.1 TeV Computed. Making a large ratio with an exponential resembles dimensional transmutation (7-01). More precisely, in RS the exponent comes from geometry (kRkR), in dimensional transmutation from the running of the coupling (1/g21/g^2). The view that connects warped extra dimensions with strongly coupled four-dimensional theories is AdS/CFT (7-08), at the level of a conjecture Physics.

Detour: extra dimensions without a gap

Detour

A subsection you may skip.

The paper of RS from the same year argued that four-dimensional gravity can be reproduced even if the extra dimension is infinitely long: 'even without a gap in the Kaluza-Klein spectrum, four-dimensional Newtonian and general relativistic gravity is reproduced to more than adequate precision' Physics. A gap in the tower is not essential for invisibility.

07

Experimental lower bounds — Newton's law and colliders

Deviations from Newton's law are by custom expressed in Yukawa form (PDG formula 84.12).

V(r)=−GNm1m2r(1+α e−r/λ)(11)V(r)=-G_N\frac{m_1m_2}{r}\big(1+\alpha\,e^{-r/\lambda}\big) \tag{11}

The exchange of a field of mass mm gives a Yukawa potential e−mr/re^{-mr}/r, and one term is added for each KK mode. In a scalar (Newtonian) model, summing the whole tower of TδT^\delta (radius RR) gives

V(r)VN(r)=∑k⃗∈Zδe−∣k⃗∣ r/R → r≫R  1+2δ e−r/R(12)\frac{V(r)}{V_{\rm N}(r)}=\sum_{\vec k\in\mathbb Z^\delta}e^{-|\vec k|\,r/R}\ \xrightarrow{\ r\gg R\ }\ 1+2\delta\,e^{-r/R} \tag{12}

2δ2\delta is the number of fields on the first rung; for δ=1\delta=1 the sum is coth⁡(r/2R)\coth(r/2R). For r≪Rr\ll R, V∝r−1−δV\propto r^{-1-\delta}: the law of a space of 3+δ3+\delta dimensions. For the graviton the coefficient changes. The KK modes of the graviton are massive spin-2 fields, and the contribution of their polarisations is said to multiply the coefficient of the first rung by 4/3; the PDG takes, for a two-dimensional torus, α=16/3\alpha=16/3 (4/3 of the 4 in (12)) and λ=R\lambda=R Physics. (12) is not the formula for gravity itself but a model for seeing how summing the tower produces a Yukawa-type deviation.

Figure 2 V/VN−1V/V_{\rm N}-1 of (12) (log scale). Varying δ\delta and r/Rr/R changes the deviation and the dimension of space that can be read off. The dashed lines are two approximations
δ = 2, r/R = 0.50
Table 4 The ratio V/VNV/V_{\rm N} of (12)
δ\deltar/R=0.1r/R=0.1110
120.022.1641.000091
2628.36.5071.000184
63.72×1093.72\times10^{9}37211.000593

ComputedThe numbers of Figure 2 and Table 4 were computed on this machine (sums over ∣k⃗∣≤420|\vec k|\le420; δ=1\delta=1 agrees with coth⁡\coth to 12 digits, and r→0r\to0 with the integral approximation to 5 digits). If JavaScript is disabled, see Table 4.

That the deviation vanishes as e−r/Re^{-r/R} for r≫Rr\gg R is the quantitative content of "invisible".

Table 5 Lower bounds from PDG 2025 (lengths converted with (1) Computed)
What was searched forLower bound
Inverse-square law (torsion balance)For δ=2\delta=2, R<30R<30 µm, MD>4.0M_D>4.0 TeV
Supernova SN1987A / neutron starsFor δ=2\delta=2, MD>27M_D>27 / 1700 TeV
Graviton emission at the LHC (ATLAS / CMS)MD>5.9M_D>5.9–11.2 / 5.5–10.7 TeV (δ=2\delta=2–6)
The lightest KK graviton of RSATLAS 4.5 TeV (k/MP=0.1k/M_P=0.1), CMS 2.2–5.6 TeV
Gauge fields propagating in flat extra dimensions1/R>4.161/R>4.16 TeV (a reinterpretation by ATLAS; 4.7×10−204.7\times10^{-20} m), ≳6\gtrsim6 TeV from LEP2
All fields propagate (UED)1/R>1.41/R>1.4–1.5 TeV. The minimal model is excluded together with dark matter

One of the inverse-square-law experiments (Tan et al. 2016) confirms ∣α∣≤1|\alpha|\le1 down to λ=59\lambda=59 µm (abstract). The observed gauge fields are four-dimensional down to about 5×10−205\times10^{-20} m, and gravity follows the inverse-square law down to some tens of µm. Extra dimensions have not been found, but neither has it been shown that there are none.

08

Back to Yang–Mills — the KK gap is not the mass gap

The KK gap is not the mass gap. The lowest rung of the tower is a gap that comes only from the internal space being compact; free fields have it too, and the zero mode has no gap. It is the same computation as the gap of a free field in a box (2-02 §06, 2-05 §06). What the prize problem asks for is a gap arising from interaction on R4\mathbb R^4, which has no compact directions (4-11), and Jaffe–Witten write 'no present ideas point the direction to establish the existence of a mass gap that is uniform in the volume'.

Do not mix the two kinds of extra dimensions. The lower bounds of §07 concern real extra dimensions. The extra dimensions of holographic models (7-08, 7-09) (the radial direction of anti-de Sitter space, S5S^5, the auxiliary circle of Witten's model) are tools of a dual description or of regularisation, and are not claimed to be real dimensions.

Within the models the tower is visible. In models that read the gap from geometry, the KK tower of the extra dimensions comes at the same height as the glueballs (in the Maldacena–Núñez model of N=1\mathcal N=1 supersymmetric Yang–Mills, if the gravity approximation is valid, 'comparable to the masses of Kaluza Klein states'; the authors also write that quantising the string on this background might allow the KK states to be separated) Physics. Removing the tower requires shrinking the extra dimensions, and then the coupling becomes weak (in four dimensions, because of asymptotic freedom), which is the opposite side from the region where the computation works (Csáki et al., of Witten's three-dimensional model: 'This is the opposite of the limit that is required for the supergravity description to be valid'). The order of limits is treated in 7-10.

Seam

What can be said as a theorem about "invisible" is only about linear fluctuations on a fixed internal space ((4)–(6)). Within the range we searched we found no result justifying that the tower separates in an interacting theory, in particular in the limit that returns to four dimensions.

Note 1 Overduin–Wesson take the four-dimensional signature (+,−,−,−)(+,-,-,-) and set κ≡4πG\kappa\equiv4\sqrt{\pi G} (formula 8). (7) is aligned with this book's signature (−,+,+,+)(-,+,+,+), and κ=16πG\kappa=\sqrt{16\pi G} is the same value. Back to text


What this chapter can say

What is saidWhat is not said
Known(2)–(8), Yau's theorem.General lower bounds for towers in warped backgrounds or of forms and spinors. The consistency of keeping ϕ\phi constant (the scalar equation requires FμνFμν=0F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=0).
ComputedTables 1–5, Figures 1 and 2, Klein's radius, reproducing the numbers of the PDG with (9).(12) is a scalar model. The 16/3 for the graviton is quoted from the PDG; the origin of the factor 4/3 is not derived in this chapter.
PhysicsThe Calabi–Yau condition, ADD and RS, non-abelian gauge fields, the height of the towers in the models.Whether real extra dimensions exist. That the towers of the models separate in the limit returning to four dimensions. This site shows neither the mass gap nor the construction of the continuum limit.

Sources and reproduction

ItemKindSource / tools
(2)(3), (9)–(11), 16/3, Table 5, quotationsKnown, PhysicsZ. Demiragli, A. Pomarol, "84. Extra Dimensions" (PDG, PRD 110 (2024) 030001, revised August 2025). Text checked.
(7)(8), Kaluza, KleinKnownJ. M. Overduin, P. S. Wesson, Phys. Rep. 283 (1997) 303, gr-qc/9805018 §3, §4 (text checked; formulas 5–8 and 25, the condition for constant ϕ\phi in §3.4). Th. Kaluza, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (1921) 966 (bibliographic data only). O. Klein, Z. Phys. 37 (1926) 895 (abstract checked); Nature 118 (1926) 516 (bibliographic data only).
(6)KnownJ. Q. Zhong, H. C. Yang, Sci. Sinica Ser. A 27 (1984) 1265 (bibliographic data only; the claim follows the survey by Ling–Lu, whose bibliographic data is not checked). F. Hang, X. Wang, IMRN 2007, rnm064, doi:10.1093/imrn/rnm064 (bibliographic data only).
The Calabi–Yau conditionPhysicsP. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, E. Witten, NPB 258 (1985) 46. Abstract checked (the term Calabi–Yau and SU(3) holonomy not checked in the text).
Yau's theoremKnownS.-T. Yau, PNAS 74 (1977) 1798 (abstract checked); CPAM 31 (1978) 339 (bibliographic data only).
ADD, RS, the inverse-square lawPhysicsN. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, PLB 429 (1998) 263. L. Randall, R. Sundrum, PRL 83 (1999) 3370; ibid. 4690. W.-H. Tan et al., PRL 116 (2016) 131101. Abstracts checked.
Quotations in §08Known, PhysicsA. Jaffe, E. Witten, "Quantum Yang–Mills Theory" (the Clay problem description; the PDF published by Clay; text checked). J. Maldacena, C. Núñez, PRL 86 (2001) 588, arXiv:hep-th/0008001 (abstract checked). C. Csáki, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz, J. Terning, JHEP 9901 (1999) 017, arXiv:hep-th/9806021 (text checked).
Tables, figures, numbersComputedPython 3 (numpy) on this machine: kk_count.py, zhong_yang.py, units_klein.py, add_rs.py, newton_kk.py (the values embedded in Figure 2 are the same computation output to 4 decimal places).

Next chapter to read: 7-07 Where gauge fields come from — extracting gauge groups from branes and geometry.

← 7-05 String theory and extra dimensionsContents7-07 Where gauge fields come from →

Revised 2026-10-01: first version.