computo ergo sum

2026-10-01 · chapter Yang–Mills and the mass gapPart 2 Physical preparationthe harmonic oscillator and Fock space

The whole book Contents and reading orders
  1. Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
  2. 0-01 How to read this book
  3. 0-02 One picture
  4. 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
  5. 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
  6. Part 1 Mathematical preparation
  7. 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
  8. 1-02 What a group is
  9. 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
  10. 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
  11. 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
  12. 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
  13. 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
  14. 1-08 Probability and measure
  15. 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
  16. 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
  17. 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
  18. 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
  19. Part 2 Physical preparation
  20. 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
  21. 2-02 The idea of a field
  22. 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
  23. 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
  24. 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
  25. 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
  26. 2-07 The idea of the path integral
  27. 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
  28. 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
  29. 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
  30. Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
  31. 3-01 The gauge principle
  32. 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
  33. 3-03 The action and the equations
  34. 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
  35. 3-05 Instantons and topology
  36. 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
  37. 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
  38. Part 4 Quantisation
  39. 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
  40. 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
  41. 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
  42. 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
  43. 4-05 The algebra of divergences
  44. 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
  45. 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
  46. 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
  47. 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
  48. 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
  49. 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
  50. 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
  51. Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
  52. 5-01 Wilson's lattice
  53. 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
  54. 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
  55. 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
  56. 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
  57. 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
  58. 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
  59. 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
  60. 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
  61. 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
  62. 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
  63. Part 6 Constructive field theory
  64. 6-01 What constructive field theory is
  65. 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
  66. 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
  67. 6-04 The cluster expansion
  68. 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
  69. 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
  70. 6-07 Four dimensions
  71. 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
  72. 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
  73. 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
  74. 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
  75. 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
  76. Part 7 From the side of physics
  77. 7-01 How physics sees it
  78. 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
  79. 7-03 The string picture
  80. 7-04 Large N
  81. 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
  82. 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
  83. 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
  84. 7-08 Holography
  85. 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
  86. 7-10 Back to four dimensions
  87. 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
  88. 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
  89. 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
  90. Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
  91. 8-01 How to read the dictionary
  92. 8-02 Dictionary A
  93. 8-03 Dictionary B
  94. 8-04 Dictionary C
  95. 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
  96. Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
  97. 9-01 How far the world has come
  98. 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
  99. 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
  100. 9-04 The list of open tasks
  101. 9-05 Common misconceptions
  102. Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
  103. 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
  104. 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
  105. 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
  106. 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
  107. 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
  108. 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
  109. 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
  110. 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
  111. 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
  112. 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
  113. 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
  114. 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
  115. 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
  116. 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
  117. 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
  118. 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
  119. 10-16 What is not claimed
  120. 10-17 Insights and small questions
  121. Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
  122. 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
  123. 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
  124. 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
  125. 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
  126. 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
  127. 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
  128. 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
  129. 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
  130. 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
  131. 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
  132. Appendices
  133. A-01 Table of notation
  134. A-02 Glossary
  135. A-03 Guide to the literature
  136. A-04 Lean and machine checking
  137. A-05 How this book was made
  138. A-06 Index of assumptions

The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation — the levels are equally spaced, and the quanta of a field are counted as particles

What this chapter shows — That the levels ℏω(n+12)\hbar\omega(n+\frac12) are determined by the algebra of creation and annihilation alone.
That the gap sets the speed of oscillation and of the decay of correlations, and that with two valleys it is invisible to perturbation theory.
That quantising a field makes particles appear, and that the gap of a free field of mass mm is mm.

Prerequisite chapters — 2-05 (states, spectra, the gap, the double well), 2-02 (normal modes, the mass term), 2-04 (the E2=p2+m2E^2=p^2+m^2 used in section 08, the imaginary time used in section 04), 1-03 (commutators). The ladder of 1-04 appears only for comparison.

Said first — Only single-particle quantum mechanics and fields without interactions are treated. The gap mm of section 08 is a value put in by hand, and is a different thing from the mass gap of Yang–Mills (4-11). This chapter shows nothing about the mass gap.

Order of this chapter
  1. Why the oscillator — near an equilibrium point everything is quadratic
  2. Creation and annihilation — algebra determines the levels
  3. The ground state and zero-point energy — a Gaussian (Figure 1)
  4. Time evolution — the gap is the speed of oscillation, and in imaginary time the rate at which correlations decrease (Figure 2)
  5. Distorting the oscillator — the gap moves (Table 1)
  6. Detour: two valleys — seen from the side of the perturbation series (Figure 3, Table 2)
  7. Many oscillators and Fock space — counting by occupation numbers
  8. Quantising a field — particles appear, and the gap is m (Figure 4, Table 3)
  9. The sum of zero-point energies, and a caution about infinitely many — only differences can be measured

01

Why the oscillator — near an equilibrium point everything is quadratic

Quantum field theory begins as a collection of harmonic oscillators. Near an equilibrium point x0x_0 any potential energy can be approximated as V(x0)+12V′′(x0)(x−x0)2V(x_0)+\frac12V''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2, and the string too was a collection of independent simple oscillations (2-02). The position xx and the momentum p=−iℏ d/dxp=-i\hbar\,d/dx are self-adjoint operators on L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R), with [x,p]=iℏ[x,p]=i\hbar (2-05).

H=p22m+mω22x2(1)H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2 \tag{1}

Measuring length in ℓ=ℏ/mω\ell=\sqrt{\hbar/m\omega} and energy in ℏω\hbar\omega, and putting ξ=x/ℓ\xi=x/\ell, η=pℓ/ℏ\eta=p\ell/\hbar, we get H=ℏω2(ξ2+η2)H=\frac{\hbar\omega}{2}(\xi^2+\eta^2), [ξ,η]=i[\xi,\eta]=i. Example. ComputedFor a spring with 1 g and 1 Hz, ℓ≈1.3×10−16\ell\approx1.3\times10^{-16} m and ℏω≈6.6×10−34\hbar\omega\approx6.6\times10^{-34} J, a value 13 orders of magnitude smaller than kBT≈4.1×10−21k_BT\approx4.1\times10^{-21} J at room temperature.

02

Creation and annihilation — algebra determines the levels

The eigenvalues of (1) can be found by algebra alone, without solving a differential equation (a†a^\dagger is the adjoint of aa).

a=ξ+iη2,a†=ξ−iη2(2)a=\frac{\xi+i\eta}{\sqrt2},\qquad a^\dagger=\frac{\xi-i\eta}{\sqrt2} \tag{2}

Since [a,a†]=1[a,a^\dagger]=1, a†a=12(ξ2+η2−1)a^\dagger a=\frac12(\xi^2+\eta^2-1),

H=ℏω(N+12),N=a†a(3)H=\hbar\omega\Bigl(N+\frac12\Bigr),\qquad N=a^\dagger a \tag{3}

From [N,a]=−a[N,a]=-a, [N,a†]=a†[N,a^\dagger]=a^\dagger: if Nψ=νψN\psi=\nu\psi, then N(aψ)=(ν−1)aψN(a\psi)=(\nu-1)a\psi, N(a†ψ)=(ν+1)a†ψN(a^\dagger\psi)=(\nu+1)a^\dagger\psi; aa lowers by 1 and a†a^\dagger raises by 1. Since ∥aψ∥2=⟨ψ,Nψ⟩=ν∥ψ∥2≥0\lVert a\psi\rVert^2=\langle\psi,N\psi\rangle=\nu\lVert\psi\rVert^2\ge0, if ν\nu is not an integer we keep going down and reach a contradiction; if it is an integer we stop at aψ0=0a\psi_0=0 with ν=0\nu=0. Going up never stops, by ∥a†ψ∥2=(ν+1)∥ψ∥2>0\lVert a^\dagger\psi\rVert^2=(\nu+1)\lVert\psi\rVert^2\gt0.

En=ℏω(n+12),n=0,1,2,…(4)E_n=\hbar\omega\Bigl(n+\frac12\Bigr),\qquad n=0,1,2,\dots \tag{4}

KnownThe levels are equally spaced, and the gap is ℏω\hbar\omega. Normalising, a†ψn=n+1 ψn+1a^\dagger\psi_n=\sqrt{n+1}\,\psi_{n+1}, aψn=n ψn−1a\psi_n=\sqrt n\,\psi_{n-1}. This is the same argument as the ladder of 1-04, but that was finite-dimensional, stopping at both ends. No finite matrices satisfy [a,a†]=1[a,a^\dagger]=1 (the trace, 0 against the dimension, does not match), so this algebra is realised only in infinite dimensions.

03

The ground state and zero-point energy — a Gaussian

In coordinates aψ0=0a\psi_0=0 is the first-order equation (ξ+ddξ)ψ0=0(\xi+\frac{d}{d\xi})\psi_0=0, and its solution is unique up to a constant multiple (no degeneracy).

ψ0(ξ)=π−1/4e−ξ2/2,ψn=(a†)nn! ψ0(5)\psi_0(\xi)=\pi^{-1/4}e^{-\xi^2/2},\quad \psi_n=\frac{(a^\dagger)^n}{\sqrt{n!}}\,\psi_0 \tag{5}

The ground state is a Gaussian, and ⟨x2⟩=ℏ/2mω\langle x^2\rangle=\hbar/2m\omega, Δx Δp=ℏ/2\Delta x\,\Delta p=\hbar/2 is exactly the lower limit of the uncertainty relation. We call E0=ℏω/2E_0=\hbar\omega/2 the zero-point energy; it cannot be made 0 because position and momentum cannot both be brought towards 0 at the same time. Precisely, ⟨H⟩≥ω⟨p2⟩⟨x2⟩≥ω Δx Δp≥ℏω/2\langle H\rangle\ge\omega\sqrt{\langle p^2\rangle\langle x^2\rangle}\ge\omega\,\Delta x\,\Delta p\ge\hbar\omega/2. ψn\psi_n is the product of a Hermite polynomial and e−ξ2/2e^{-\xi^2/2}.

Figure 1 Changing n changes the probability density ∣ψn∣2|\psi_n|^2 (solid) and the fraction of time spent by a classical particle of the same energy (dashed). Grey is the region a classical particle cannot enter
n = 0

ComputedThe curves are computed on the spot from the recurrence ψn+1=2n+1 ξψn−nn+1 ψn−1\psi_{n+1}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{n+1}}\,\xi\psi_n-\sqrt{\frac{n}{n+1}}\,\psi_{n-1} (which follows from (2) and the ladder relations) and the classical density 1/(π2n+1−ξ2)1/(\pi\sqrt{2n+1-\xi^2}).

ComputedThe probability of being in the forbidden region, found by numerical integration, is 0.1573, 0.1116, 0.0951, 0.0740, 0.0602, 0.0425 for n=0,1,2,5,10,30n=0,1,2,5,10,30 (n=0n=0 is erfc⁡(1)=2π∫1∞e−t2 dt\operatorname{erfc}(1)=\frac{2}{\sqrt\pi}\int_1^\infty e^{-t^2}\,dt). For large nn, ∣ψn∣2|\psi_n|^2 with its wiggles averaged out approaches the classical density.

04

Time evolution — the gap is the speed of oscillation

An eigenstate only has its phase turning, and its density does not move. For ψ=c0ψ0+c1ψ1\psi=c_0\psi_0+c_1\psi_1, with Δ=E1−E0\Delta=E_1-E_0 (the diagonal terms are 0 by parity),

⟨x⟩(t)=2 Re(c0‾c1e−iΔt/ℏ)⟨ψ0,xψ1⟩(6)\langle x\rangle(t)=2\,\mathrm{Re}\bigl(\overline{c_0}c_1e^{-i\Delta t/\hbar}\bigr)\langle\psi_0,x\psi_1\rangle \tag{6}

The gap is the speed at which observable quantities oscillate, and for the oscillator it is the classical ω\omega. The weights of a coherent state ψα=e−∣α∣2/2∑nαnn!ψn\psi_\alpha=e^{-|\alpha|^2/2}\sum_n\frac{\alpha^n}{\sqrt{n!}}\psi_n (aψα=αψαa\psi_\alpha=\alpha\psi_\alpha) follow a Poisson distribution with mean ∣α∣2|\alpha|^2, and if α\alpha is real the density keeps its shape and goes back and forth along the classical orbit.

∣ψα(ξ,t)∣2=π−1/2e−(ξ−2αcos⁡ωt)2(7)|\psi_\alpha(\xi,t)|^2=\pi^{-1/2}e^{-(\xi-\sqrt2\alpha\cos\omega t)^2} \tag{7}
Figure 2 Changing α and pressing "Play", the density of the coherent state (solid) goes back and forth with the same period as the classical particle (dot). The dotted line is the potential energy, and the bars on the right are the weights of the levels n
α = 1.5

ComputedComputed on the spot from formula (7) and the Poisson distribution.

In imaginary time, the gap is the rate at which correlations decrease

We compute (8) of 2-05 with the A=xA=x of the oscillator. From (2), x=ℓ (a+a†)/2x=\ell\,(a+a^\dagger)/\sqrt2, so xψ0=ℓ2ψ1x\psi_0=\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}\psi_1, and there are no other components.

G(τ)=⟨xψ0,  e−τ(H−E0)/ℏ xψ0⟩=ℓ22 e−ωτ=ℏ2mω e−ωτ(8)G(\tau)=\bigl\langle x\psi_0,\;e^{-\tau(H-E_0)/\hbar}\,x\psi_0\bigr\rangle=\frac{\ell^2}{2}\,e^{-\omega\tau}=\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\,e^{-\omega\tau} \tag{8}

The rate of decrease is the gap (E1−E0)/ℏ=ω(E_1-E_0)/\hbar=\omega, and (8) of 2-05 is an equality for the oscillator. For a general VV it becomes G(τ)=∑n≥1∣⟨ψn,xψ0⟩∣2e−(En−E0)τ/ℏG(\tau)=\sum_{n\ge1}|\langle\psi_n,x\psi_0\rangle|^2e^{-(E_n-E_0)\tau/\hbar}, and the term n=1n=1 remains at τ→∞\tau\to\infty (when ⟨ψ1,xψ0⟩≠0\langle\psi_1,x\psi_0\rangle\ne0). Correlations in imaginary time decrease at the rate of the gap. Measuring glueball masses on the lattice (5-08) and restating the mass gap as the decay of correlations (4-11) both have this form (for the meaning of t=−iτt=-i\tau see 2-04; for the path integral, 2-07).

05

Distorting the oscillator — the gap moves

We add a quartic term (ℏ=m=ω=1\hbar=m=\omega=1).

H=p22+x22+λx4(9)H=\frac{p^2}{2}+\frac{x^2}{2}+\lambda x^4 \tag{9}

x4=14(a+a†)4x^4=\frac14(a+a^\dagger)^4 moves nn by up to 4, so the ladder no longer closes. At first order of perturbation (replacing by the expectation value), En≈n+12+3λ4(2n2+2n+1)E_n\approx n+\frac12+\frac{3\lambda}{4}(2n^2+2n+1), and the gap is 1+3λ1+3\lambda.

ComputedTable 1 The levels of formula (9) found by finite differences (the change on halving the step is within 3×10−63\times10^{-6}).

λGap E₁−E₀First-order estimate 1+3λE₂−E₁
01.000011.0000
0.011.02841.031.0552
0.11.21041.31.3691
11.934142.4414
103.8166315.0254

The estimate fits at λ=0.01\lambda=0.01 and fails at λ=1\lambda=1. The spacing widens further up, and the gap stays positive. KnownIn one dimension, if VV is continuous and V→∞V\to\infty as ∣x∣→∞|x|\to\infty, the spectrum consists only of eigenvalues (discrete spectrum, 1-10), and no eigenvalue is degenerate. Why there is no degeneracy can be said briefly. For eigenfunctions ψ,χ\psi,\chi with the same EE, the Wronskian W=ψχ′−ψ′χW=\psi\chi'-\psi'\chi is constant by the equation, W′=0W'=0, and is 0 far away, so it is identically 0; that is, ψ\psi and χ\chi are proportional. The proof of discreteness is in the textbook in the table of sources (for the ground state see section 04 of 2-05).

06

Detour: two valleys — seen from the side of the perturbation series

Detour

A section you may skip.

We look again at the double well of 2-05 from the side of the perturbation series of the oscillator (ℏ=m=1\hbar=m=1).

V(x)=12x2(1−g x)2=x22−g x3+g2 x4(10)V(x)=\frac12x^2\bigl(1-\sqrt g\,x\bigr)^2=\frac{x^2}{2}-\sqrt g\,x^3+\frac g2\,x^4 \tag{10}

This is (9) of 2-05 with g=1/4a2g=1/4a^2, shifted by aa (V(x)=Va(x−a)V(x)=V_a(x-a); the valleys are at 00 and 1/g1/\sqrt g), and has the form of equation (2.4) of Zinn-Justin–Jentschura (2004). The bottom of the left valley is the oscillator of section 01, and the remainder −g x3+g2x4-\sqrt g\,x^3+\frac g2x^4 is expanded as a perturbation in powers of gg, as in section 05. Starting from the right valley via the reflection x↦1/g−xx\mapsto1/\sqrt g-x gives the same computation, and the lowest two levels both have the following series as their asymptotic expansion Known (equation (2.6) of that paper).

E∼12−g−92g2−892g3−50138g4−⋯E\sim\frac12-g-\frac92g^2-\frac{89}{2}g^3-\frac{5013}{8}g^4-\cdots

The coefficients grow factorially, and at every order the gap is 0. The gap lies outside the series; it is the following formula, (10) of 2-05 written in gg (equation (2.8) of that paper).

E1−E0≈2πg e−1/(6g)(11)E_1-E_0\approx\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi g}}\,e^{-1/(6g)} \tag{11}

The 16g\frac1{6g} in the exponent is the S0=2a2/3S_0=2a^2/3 of 2-05, and is said to be the action of the path that goes from valley to valley by passing under the hill. Precisely, it is the action of the classical solution (instanton, 3-05) that rolls from hilltop to hilltop of −V-V in imaginary time.

Figure 3 Changing 1/g changes the two valleys (left) and the lowest four levels. On the right is the common logarithm of the gap E1−E0E_1-E_0 (dots: numerical, dashed: formula (11)). As the valleys move apart the gap shrinks exponentially
1/g = 20

ComputedThe levels are values found on this machine; the dashed line is formula (11).

ComputedThe partial sums only draw towards the mean of the two levels, and do not separate them. The partial sums up to five terms draw, for 1/g=401/g=40, as 0.5, 0.475, 0.472188, 0.471492, 0.471247 towards the mean 0.471054 (E0=0.467282E_0=0.467282, E1=0.474826E_1=0.474826), and for 1/g=1001/g=100, as 0.5, 0.49, 0.48955, 0.4895055, 0.4894992 towards the mean 0.4894978 (E0=0.4894975E_0=0.4894975, E1=0.4894981E_1=0.4894981).

ComputedTable 2 The ratio of the gap to formula (11) on the low-hill side. The rightmost column is the ratio to the formula multiplied by the next correction (1−7112g)(1-\frac{71}{12}g) of the same paper (the coefficient of equation (2.19a)). 1/g=161/g=16–100100 are in Table 4 of 2-05.

1/gHeight of hillGap E₁−E₀RatioRatio with correction
200.6251.114e−10.6190.879
300.9383.153e−20.7570.943
401.2507.544e−30.8310.975

PhysicsThe gap of Yang–Mills too is held to be proportional to the scale Λ\Lambda, and Λ\Lambda depends on the coupling constant in the form e−c/g2e^{-c/g^2} (c>0c\gt0; gg is the coupling constant at the scale μ\mu, with a power of gg in front), so it is invisible to perturbation theory (4-07, 4-12).

07

Many oscillators and Fock space — counting by occupation numbers

If there are KK independent oscillators, [ak,al†]=δkl[a_k,a_l^\dagger]=\delta_{kl}, [ak,al]=0[a_k,a_l]=0, and

H=∑k=1Kℏωk(ak†ak+12)(12)H=\sum_{k=1}^{K}\hbar\omega_k\Bigl(a_k^\dagger a_k+\frac12\Bigr) \tag{12}

The eigenstates are labelled by the tuple of occupation numbers (n1,…,nK)(n_1,\dots,n_K), and nkn_k is "the number of quanta in mode kk". All zeros is the vacuum ∣0⟩|0\rangle, and ak†∣0⟩a_k^\dagger|0\rangle is a one-quantum state. Since ak†al†∣0⟩=al†ak†∣0⟩a_k^\dagger a_l^\dagger|0\rangle=a_l^\dagger a_k^\dagger|0\rangle, quanta carry no name tags; only "how many in which mode" has meaning. Quantising the chain of 2-02 gives this form.

The form that does not depend on the number of oscillators is Fock space. Let the one-quantum space be h\mathfrak h (here CK\mathbb C^K; for a field, a space of functions). For h=CK\mathfrak h=\mathbb C^K, Symrh\mathrm{Sym}^r\mathfrak h may be read as the space whose orthonormal basis is the tuples of occupation numbers above summing to rr, (n1,…,nK)(n_1,\dots,n_K) (precisely, it is the symmetrisation of the tensor product of rr copies). If there are infinitely many modes, we take as basis the tuples with finitely many non-zero nkn_k summing to rr.

F(h)=⨁r=0∞Symrh,Sym0h=C ∣0⟩(13)\mathcal F(\mathfrak h)=\bigoplus_{r=0}^{\infty}\mathrm{Sym}^r\mathfrak h,\quad \mathrm{Sym}^0\mathfrak h=\mathbb C\,|0\rangle \tag{13}

The direct sum is the set of all sequences whose sums of squared norms are finite, and the total number of quanta N^=∑kak†ak\hat N=\sum_ka_k^\dagger a_k has value rr on Symrh\mathrm{Sym}^r\mathfrak h. Example. The number of ways to distribute rr quanta over KK modes is (r+K−1r)\binom{r+K-1}{r}, and dim⁡Sym2C3=6\dim\mathrm{Sym}^2\mathbb C^3=6. KnownThe method of treating light with creation and annihilation is said to go back to Dirac (1927), and this space to Fock (1932).

08

Quantising a field — particles appear, and the gap is m

On a ring of length LL (periodic boundary), we quantise a field with a mass term mm (2-02 §06) (ℏ=c=1\hbar=c=1). Placing an oscillator for each mode eikxe^{ikx} (k=2πn/Lk=2\pi n/L, ωk=k2+m2\omega_k=\sqrt{k^2+m^2}; the dispersion relation ω2=c2k2+Ω2\omega^2=c^2k^2+\Omega^2 of 2-02 with c=1c=1, Ω=m\Omega=m),

ϕ(x)=∑kakeikx+ak†e−ikx2Lωk(14)\phi(x)=\sum_k\frac{a_ke^{ikx}+a_k^\dagger e^{-ikx}}{\sqrt{2L\omega_k}} \tag{14} H=∑kωk(ak†ak+12)(15)H=\sum_k\omega_k\Bigl(a_k^\dagger a_k+\frac12\Bigr) \tag{15}

The total momentum is P=∑kk ak†akP=\sum_kk\,a_k^\dagger a_k. One quantum of mode kk carries energy k2+m2\sqrt{k^2+m^2} and momentum kk, which is exactly the relation E2=p2+m2E^2=p^2+m^2 of a particle of mass mm (2-04). A particle is a quantum of a normal mode of the field. In the (P,E)(P,E) plane (Figure 4) a single particle lies on the hyperbola E=P2+m2E=\sqrt{P^2+m^2}, and two or more particles fill the side E≥P2+4m2E\ge\sqrt{P^2+4m^2}. Next after the vacuum is the single particle with k=0k=0, and even when the box is widened the gap is mm. KnownIn infinite volume kk ranges over all real numbers, the single-particle energies k2+m2\sqrt{k^2+m^2} cover [m,∞)[m,\infty), and multi-particle states lie in [2m,∞)[2m,\infty), so the spectrum of the Hamiltonian is {0}∪[m,∞)\{0\}\cup[m,\infty). For m=0m=0 the gap 2π/L2\pi/L shrinks to 0 (excluding k=0k=0, which is not an oscillator).

Figure 4 Changing L and m changes the momentum P (horizontal) and energy E (vertical) of all states (E ≤ 3) of the free field in a box. Large dots are single particles. The dashed lines are E=P2+(jm)2E=\sqrt{P^2+(jm)^2} (j = 1, 2, 3; for m = 0, E=∣P∣E=|P|), and the dotted line is the gap. When there are more than 10,000 states, the dots for two or more particles are omitted
L = 10.0

ComputedThe dots are tuples of occupation numbers enumerated on the spot (the same procedure as Table 3).

ComputedTable 3 The number of states with E≤3E\le3 and the gap, for the free field in a box of period LL.

Lm = 1: gapNumber of statesm = 0: gapNumber of states
51.0000101.25668
101.0000230.628338
201.0000690.3142734
401.00002190.157155535
The gap of a free field, and the gap of the problem statement

The mm here is a value put in by hand. The action of Yang–Mills has no mass term (3-02), and self-interaction makes the modes no longer independent. PhysicsEven so, a gap is thought to arise, and showing it as mathematics is the content of the problem (0-03, 4-11).

09

The sum of zero-point energies, and a caution about infinitely many — only differences can be measured

The vacuum energy ∑kωk/2\sum_k\omega_k/2 of (15) diverges. Cutting off at ∣k∣≤Λ|k|\le\Lambda and putting Λ≫m\Lambda\gg m,

∑∣k∣≤Λωk2≈L2π∫−ΛΛωk2 dk≈LΛ24π(16)\sum_{|k|\le\Lambda}\frac{\omega_k}{2}\approx\frac{L}{2\pi}\int_{-\Lambda}^{\Lambda}\frac{\omega_k}{2}\,dk\approx\frac{L\Lambda^2}{4\pi} \tag{16}

It is proportional to the volume and grows like Λ2\Lambda^2. Since what can be measured is differences, we discard the constant and put H=∑kωkak†akH=\sum_k\omega_ka_k^\dagger a_k (normal ordering). The gap is a difference, so it does not change. PhysicsThe difference of vacuum energies when the box is changed can remain finite, and the Lüscher term is held to be an example (7-03).

Providing operators satisfying [ak,al†]=δkl[a_k,a_l^\dagger]=\delta_{kl} on a Hilbert space is called a representation of the commutation relations. KnownFor finitely many oscillators, when the commutation relations are written in exponential form (the Weyl relations; for one oscillator eisxeitp=e−iℏsteitpeisxe^{isx}e^{itp}=e^{-i\hbar st}e^{itp}e^{isx}), the unitary irreducible representations (those whose only invariant closed subspaces are trivial) are unique up to unitary equivalence (being carried into each other by a unitary map) (Stone–von Neumann). For infinitely many, representations not unitarily equivalent to the Fock representation can be built. For example, the state with one quantum in every mode has an infinite sum of occupation numbers and is not in Fock space, and another representation with it as the vacuum can be considered. Fields with interactions are treated together with Haag's theorem in 4-09.


What this chapter can say

ContentStatus
Sections 01–04: the levels and states of the oscillator, the decay of correlationsSaid Known
Section 05: the levels and gap of the distorted oscillatorSaid as numbers Computed. Discreteness and non-degeneracy are Known
Section 06: the perturbation series common to the two levels and formula (11)Formulas from the literature Known. Partial sums and the gap checked against numbers Computed. Not derived
Sections 07–08: Fock space, the spectrum {0} ∪ [m, ∞)Said Known (Table 3 Computed)
Representations of infinitely many oscillatorsIntroduced only (4-09)
The mass gap of Yang–MillsThis chapter shows nothing

Sources and reproduction

ItemKindSource / tools
Tables 1–3, Figures 1–4, the numbers in the textComputedpython3, NumPy, SciPy (eigenvalues by finite differences, numerical integration, enumeration). The figures by JavaScript in the browser
The method of treating radiation with creation and annihilationKnownP. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 114 (1927) 243–265, doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039. Bibliographic data only
Fock spaceKnownV. Fock, Z. Phys. 75 (1932) 622–647, doi:10.1007/BF01344458. Bibliographic data only
Two valleys: formulas (10)(11), the series, the correction 71/12KnownJ. Zinn-Justin, U. D. Jentschura, Ann. Phys. 313 (2004) 197–267, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.04.004, arXiv:quant-ph/0501136 (equations (2.4)(2.6)(2.8)(2.19a)(2.20) of §2.1 checked). The introduction and numbers for the same system are in 2-05
That the spectrum is discrete in one dimension when V→∞V\to\inftyKnownM. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics IV: Analysis of Operators (Academic Press), chapter XIII. Bibliographic data only (year of publication and the relevant section not checked)
The spectrum {0}∪[m,∞)\{0\}\cup[m,\infty) of the free fieldKnownM. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness (Academic Press, 1975), the section on the free relativistic field (said to be §X.7; section number not checked). Bibliographic data only
Stone–von Neumann uniquenessKnownJ. von Neumann, Math. Ann. 104 (1931) 570–578, doi:10.1007/BF01457956. Bibliographic data only. Infinitely many oscillators and Haag's theorem are treated in 4-09

Next chapter: 2-07 The idea of the path integral.

← 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanicsContents2-07 The idea of the path integral →

Revised 2026-10-01: first version.