The whole book Contents and reading orders
- Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
- 0-01 How to read this book
- 0-02 One picture
- 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
- 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
- Part 1 Mathematical preparation
- 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
- 1-02 What a group is
- 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
- 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
- 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
- 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
- 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
- 1-08 Probability and measure
- 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
- 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
- 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
- 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
- Part 2 Physical preparation
- 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
- 2-02 The idea of a field
- 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
- 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
- 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
- 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
- 2-07 The idea of the path integral
- 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
- 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
- 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
- Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
- 3-01 The gauge principle
- 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
- 3-03 The action and the equations
- 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
- 3-05 Instantons and topology
- 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
- 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
- Part 4 Quantisation
- 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
- 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
- 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
- 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
- 4-05 The algebra of divergences
- 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
- 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
- 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
- 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
- 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
- 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
- 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
- Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
- 5-01 Wilson's lattice
- 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
- 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
- 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
- 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
- 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
- 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
- 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
- 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
- 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
- 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
- Part 6 Constructive field theory
- 6-01 What constructive field theory is
- 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
- 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
- 6-04 The cluster expansion
- 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
- 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
- 6-07 Four dimensions
- 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
- 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
- 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
- 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
- 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
- Part 7 From the side of physics
- 7-01 How physics sees it
- 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
- 7-03 The string picture
- 7-04 Large N
- 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
- 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
- 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
- 7-08 Holography
- 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
- 7-10 Back to four dimensions
- 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
- 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
- 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
- Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
- 8-01 How to read the dictionary
- 8-02 Dictionary A
- 8-03 Dictionary B
- 8-04 Dictionary C
- 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
- Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
- 9-01 How far the world has come
- 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
- 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
- 9-04 The list of open tasks
- 9-05 Common misconceptions
- Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
- 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
- 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
- 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
- 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
- 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
- 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
- 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
- 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
- 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
- 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
- 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
- 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
- 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
- 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
- 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
- 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
- 10-16 What is not claimed
- 10-17 Insights and small questions
- Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
- 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
- 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
- 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
- 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
- 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
- 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
- 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
- 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
- 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
- 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
- Appendices
- A-01 Table of notation
- A-02 Glossary
- A-03 Guide to the literature
- A-04 Lean and machine checking
- A-05 How this book was made
- A-06 Index of assumptions
The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation — the levels are equally spaced, and the quanta of a field are counted as particles
What this chapter shows — That the levels are determined by the algebra of creation and annihilation alone.
That the gap sets the speed of oscillation and of the decay of correlations, and that with two valleys it is invisible to perturbation theory.
That quantising a field makes particles appear, and that the gap of a free field of mass is .
Prerequisite chapters — 2-05 (states, spectra, the gap, the double well), 2-02 (normal modes, the mass term), 2-04 (the used in section 08, the imaginary time used in section 04), 1-03 (commutators). The ladder of 1-04 appears only for comparison.
Said first — Only single-particle quantum mechanics and fields without interactions are treated. The gap of section 08 is a value put in by hand, and is a different thing from the mass gap of Yang–Mills (4-11). This chapter shows nothing about the mass gap.
- Why the oscillator — near an equilibrium point everything is quadratic
- Creation and annihilation — algebra determines the levels
- The ground state and zero-point energy — a Gaussian (Figure 1)
- Time evolution — the gap is the speed of oscillation, and in imaginary time the rate at which correlations decrease (Figure 2)
- Distorting the oscillator — the gap moves (Table 1)
- Detour: two valleys — seen from the side of the perturbation series (Figure 3, Table 2)
- Many oscillators and Fock space — counting by occupation numbers
- Quantising a field — particles appear, and the gap is m (Figure 4, Table 3)
- The sum of zero-point energies, and a caution about infinitely many — only differences can be measured
Why the oscillator — near an equilibrium point everything is quadratic
Quantum field theory begins as a collection of harmonic oscillators. Near an equilibrium point any potential energy can be approximated as , and the string too was a collection of independent simple oscillations (2-02). The position and the momentum are self-adjoint operators on , with (2-05).
Measuring length in and energy in , and putting , , we get , . Example. ComputedFor a spring with 1 g and 1 Hz, m and J, a value 13 orders of magnitude smaller than J at room temperature.
Creation and annihilation — algebra determines the levels
The eigenvalues of (1) can be found by algebra alone, without solving a differential equation ( is the adjoint of ).
Since , ,
From , : if , then , ; lowers by 1 and raises by 1. Since , if is not an integer we keep going down and reach a contradiction; if it is an integer we stop at with . Going up never stops, by .
KnownThe levels are equally spaced, and the gap is . Normalising, , . This is the same argument as the ladder of 1-04, but that was finite-dimensional, stopping at both ends. No finite matrices satisfy (the trace, 0 against the dimension, does not match), so this algebra is realised only in infinite dimensions.
The ground state and zero-point energy — a Gaussian
In coordinates is the first-order equation , and its solution is unique up to a constant multiple (no degeneracy).
The ground state is a Gaussian, and , is exactly the lower limit of the uncertainty relation. We call the zero-point energy; it cannot be made 0 because position and momentum cannot both be brought towards 0 at the same time. Precisely, . is the product of a Hermite polynomial and .
ComputedThe curves are computed on the spot from the recurrence (which follows from (2) and the ladder relations) and the classical density .
ComputedThe probability of being in the forbidden region, found by numerical integration, is 0.1573, 0.1116, 0.0951, 0.0740, 0.0602, 0.0425 for ( is ). For large , with its wiggles averaged out approaches the classical density.
Time evolution — the gap is the speed of oscillation
An eigenstate only has its phase turning, and its density does not move. For , with (the diagonal terms are 0 by parity),
The gap is the speed at which observable quantities oscillate, and for the oscillator it is the classical . The weights of a coherent state () follow a Poisson distribution with mean , and if is real the density keeps its shape and goes back and forth along the classical orbit.
ComputedComputed on the spot from formula (7) and the Poisson distribution.
In imaginary time, the gap is the rate at which correlations decrease
We compute (8) of 2-05 with the of the oscillator. From (2), , so , and there are no other components.
The rate of decrease is the gap , and (8) of 2-05 is an equality for the oscillator. For a general it becomes , and the term remains at (when ). Correlations in imaginary time decrease at the rate of the gap. Measuring glueball masses on the lattice (5-08) and restating the mass gap as the decay of correlations (4-11) both have this form (for the meaning of see 2-04; for the path integral, 2-07).
Distorting the oscillator — the gap moves
We add a quartic term ().
moves by up to 4, so the ladder no longer closes. At first order of perturbation (replacing by the expectation value), , and the gap is .
ComputedTable 1 The levels of formula (9) found by finite differences (the change on halving the step is within ).
| λ | Gap E₁−E₀ | First-order estimate 1+3λ | E₂−E₁ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.0000 | 1 | 1.0000 |
| 0.01 | 1.0284 | 1.03 | 1.0552 |
| 0.1 | 1.2104 | 1.3 | 1.3691 |
| 1 | 1.9341 | 4 | 2.4414 |
| 10 | 3.8166 | 31 | 5.0254 |
The estimate fits at and fails at . The spacing widens further up, and the gap stays positive. KnownIn one dimension, if is continuous and as , the spectrum consists only of eigenvalues (discrete spectrum, 1-10), and no eigenvalue is degenerate. Why there is no degeneracy can be said briefly. For eigenfunctions with the same , the Wronskian is constant by the equation, , and is 0 far away, so it is identically 0; that is, and are proportional. The proof of discreteness is in the textbook in the table of sources (for the ground state see section 04 of 2-05).
Detour: two valleys — seen from the side of the perturbation series
A section you may skip.
We look again at the double well of 2-05 from the side of the perturbation series of the oscillator ().
This is (9) of 2-05 with , shifted by (; the valleys are at and ), and has the form of equation (2.4) of Zinn-Justin–Jentschura (2004). The bottom of the left valley is the oscillator of section 01, and the remainder is expanded as a perturbation in powers of , as in section 05. Starting from the right valley via the reflection gives the same computation, and the lowest two levels both have the following series as their asymptotic expansion Known (equation (2.6) of that paper).
The coefficients grow factorially, and at every order the gap is 0. The gap lies outside the series; it is the following formula, (10) of 2-05 written in (equation (2.8) of that paper).
The in the exponent is the of 2-05, and is said to be the action of the path that goes from valley to valley by passing under the hill. Precisely, it is the action of the classical solution (instanton, 3-05) that rolls from hilltop to hilltop of in imaginary time.
ComputedThe levels are values found on this machine; the dashed line is formula (11).
ComputedThe partial sums only draw towards the mean of the two levels, and do not separate them. The partial sums up to five terms draw, for , as 0.5, 0.475, 0.472188, 0.471492, 0.471247 towards the mean 0.471054 (, ), and for , as 0.5, 0.49, 0.48955, 0.4895055, 0.4894992 towards the mean 0.4894978 (, ).
ComputedTable 2 The ratio of the gap to formula (11) on the low-hill side. The rightmost column is the ratio to the formula multiplied by the next correction of the same paper (the coefficient of equation (2.19a)). – are in Table 4 of 2-05.
| 1/g | Height of hill | Gap E₁−E₀ | Ratio | Ratio with correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 0.625 | 1.114e−1 | 0.619 | 0.879 |
| 30 | 0.938 | 3.153e−2 | 0.757 | 0.943 |
| 40 | 1.250 | 7.544e−3 | 0.831 | 0.975 |
PhysicsThe gap of Yang–Mills too is held to be proportional to the scale , and depends on the coupling constant in the form (; is the coupling constant at the scale , with a power of in front), so it is invisible to perturbation theory (4-07, 4-12).
Many oscillators and Fock space — counting by occupation numbers
If there are independent oscillators, , , and
The eigenstates are labelled by the tuple of occupation numbers , and is "the number of quanta in mode ". All zeros is the vacuum , and is a one-quantum state. Since , quanta carry no name tags; only "how many in which mode" has meaning. Quantising the chain of 2-02 gives this form.
The form that does not depend on the number of oscillators is Fock space. Let the one-quantum space be (here ; for a field, a space of functions). For , may be read as the space whose orthonormal basis is the tuples of occupation numbers above summing to , (precisely, it is the symmetrisation of the tensor product of copies). If there are infinitely many modes, we take as basis the tuples with finitely many non-zero summing to .
The direct sum is the set of all sequences whose sums of squared norms are finite, and the total number of quanta has value on . Example. The number of ways to distribute quanta over modes is , and . KnownThe method of treating light with creation and annihilation is said to go back to Dirac (1927), and this space to Fock (1932).
Quantising a field — particles appear, and the gap is m
On a ring of length (periodic boundary), we quantise a field with a mass term (2-02 §06) (). Placing an oscillator for each mode (, ; the dispersion relation of 2-02 with , ),
The total momentum is . One quantum of mode carries energy and momentum , which is exactly the relation of a particle of mass (2-04). A particle is a quantum of a normal mode of the field. In the plane (Figure 4) a single particle lies on the hyperbola , and two or more particles fill the side . Next after the vacuum is the single particle with , and even when the box is widened the gap is . KnownIn infinite volume ranges over all real numbers, the single-particle energies cover , and multi-particle states lie in , so the spectrum of the Hamiltonian is . For the gap shrinks to 0 (excluding , which is not an oscillator).
ComputedThe dots are tuples of occupation numbers enumerated on the spot (the same procedure as Table 3).
ComputedTable 3 The number of states with and the gap, for the free field in a box of period .
| L | m = 1: gap | Number of states | m = 0: gap | Number of states |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1.0000 | 10 | 1.2566 | 8 |
| 10 | 1.0000 | 23 | 0.6283 | 38 |
| 20 | 1.0000 | 69 | 0.3142 | 734 |
| 40 | 1.0000 | 219 | 0.1571 | 55535 |
The here is a value put in by hand. The action of Yang–Mills has no mass term (3-02), and self-interaction makes the modes no longer independent. PhysicsEven so, a gap is thought to arise, and showing it as mathematics is the content of the problem (0-03, 4-11).
The sum of zero-point energies, and a caution about infinitely many — only differences can be measured
The vacuum energy of (15) diverges. Cutting off at and putting ,
It is proportional to the volume and grows like . Since what can be measured is differences, we discard the constant and put (normal ordering). The gap is a difference, so it does not change. PhysicsThe difference of vacuum energies when the box is changed can remain finite, and the Lüscher term is held to be an example (7-03).
Providing operators satisfying on a Hilbert space is called a representation of the commutation relations. KnownFor finitely many oscillators, when the commutation relations are written in exponential form (the Weyl relations; for one oscillator ), the unitary irreducible representations (those whose only invariant closed subspaces are trivial) are unique up to unitary equivalence (being carried into each other by a unitary map) (Stone–von Neumann). For infinitely many, representations not unitarily equivalent to the Fock representation can be built. For example, the state with one quantum in every mode has an infinite sum of occupation numbers and is not in Fock space, and another representation with it as the vacuum can be considered. Fields with interactions are treated together with Haag's theorem in 4-09.
What this chapter can say
| Content | Status |
|---|---|
| Sections 01–04: the levels and states of the oscillator, the decay of correlations | Said Known |
| Section 05: the levels and gap of the distorted oscillator | Said as numbers Computed. Discreteness and non-degeneracy are Known |
| Section 06: the perturbation series common to the two levels and formula (11) | Formulas from the literature Known. Partial sums and the gap checked against numbers Computed. Not derived |
| Sections 07–08: Fock space, the spectrum {0} ∪ [m, ∞) | Said Known (Table 3 Computed) |
| Representations of infinitely many oscillators | Introduced only (4-09) |
| The mass gap of Yang–Mills | This chapter shows nothing |
Sources and reproduction
| Item | Kind | Source / tools |
|---|---|---|
| Tables 1–3, Figures 1–4, the numbers in the text | Computed | python3, NumPy, SciPy (eigenvalues by finite differences, numerical integration, enumeration). The figures by JavaScript in the browser |
| The method of treating radiation with creation and annihilation | Known | P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 114 (1927) 243–265, doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039. Bibliographic data only |
| Fock space | Known | V. Fock, Z. Phys. 75 (1932) 622–647, doi:10.1007/BF01344458. Bibliographic data only |
| Two valleys: formulas (10)(11), the series, the correction 71/12 | Known | J. Zinn-Justin, U. D. Jentschura, Ann. Phys. 313 (2004) 197–267, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.04.004, arXiv:quant-ph/0501136 (equations (2.4)(2.6)(2.8)(2.19a)(2.20) of §2.1 checked). The introduction and numbers for the same system are in 2-05 |
| That the spectrum is discrete in one dimension when | Known | M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics IV: Analysis of Operators (Academic Press), chapter XIII. Bibliographic data only (year of publication and the relevant section not checked) |
| The spectrum of the free field | Known | M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness (Academic Press, 1975), the section on the free relativistic field (said to be §X.7; section number not checked). Bibliographic data only |
| Stone–von Neumann uniqueness | Known | J. von Neumann, Math. Ann. 104 (1931) 570–578, doi:10.1007/BF01457956. Bibliographic data only. Infinitely many oscillators and Haag's theorem are treated in 4-09 |
Next chapter: 2-07 The idea of the path integral.
← 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanicsContents2-07 The idea of the path integral →