The whole book Contents and reading orders
- Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
- 0-01 How to read this book
- 0-02 One picture
- 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
- 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
- Part 1 Mathematical preparation
- 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
- 1-02 What a group is
- 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
- 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
- 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
- 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
- 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
- 1-08 Probability and measure
- 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
- 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
- 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
- 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
- Part 2 Physical preparation
- 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
- 2-02 The idea of a field
- 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
- 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
- 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
- 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
- 2-07 The idea of the path integral
- 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
- 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
- 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
- Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
- 3-01 The gauge principle
- 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
- 3-03 The action and the equations
- 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
- 3-05 Instantons and topology
- 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
- 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
- Part 4 Quantisation
- 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
- 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
- 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
- 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
- 4-05 The algebra of divergences
- 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
- 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
- 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
- 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
- 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
- 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
- 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
- Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
- 5-01 Wilson's lattice
- 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
- 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
- 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
- 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
- 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
- 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
- 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
- 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
- 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
- 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
- Part 6 Constructive field theory
- 6-01 What constructive field theory is
- 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
- 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
- 6-04 The cluster expansion
- 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
- 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
- 6-07 Four dimensions
- 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
- 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
- 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
- 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
- 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
- Part 7 From the side of physics
- 7-01 How physics sees it
- 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
- 7-03 The string picture
- 7-04 Large N
- 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
- 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
- 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
- 7-08 Holography
- 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
- 7-10 Back to four dimensions
- 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
- 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
- 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
- Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
- 8-01 How to read the dictionary
- 8-02 Dictionary A
- 8-03 Dictionary B
- 8-04 Dictionary C
- 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
- Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
- 9-01 How far the world has come
- 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
- 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
- 9-04 The list of open tasks
- 9-05 Common misconceptions
- Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
- 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
- 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
- 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
- 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
- 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
- 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
- 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
- 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
- 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
- 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
- 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
- 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
- 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
- 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
- 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
- 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
- 10-16 What is not claimed
- 10-17 Insights and small questions
- Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
- 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
- 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
- 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
- 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
- 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
- 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
- 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
- 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
- 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
- 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
- Appendices
- A-01 Table of notation
- A-02 Glossary
- A-03 Guide to the literature
- A-04 Lean and machine checking
- A-05 How this book was made
- A-06 Index of assumptions
The string picture — treating the tube of confinement as a single string, a universal correction and a shape come out of its fluctuations
What this chapter shows — We follow how the Lüscher term comes out of the zero-point energy of the transverse fluctuations of the tube, and why its coefficient does not depend on the details of the theory. With formulas, moving figures and computations we look at the thickness of the tube, the Nambu–Goto levels, the "rigid side" and the "rough side" of the lattice string, and the shape selected by a tension that depends on direction (the Wulff shape).
Prerequisite chapters — 7-01 How physics sees it (Wilson loops, the area law, the string tension ). The zero-point energy (2-06) and the strong-coupling expansion (5-02) are written on the spot as far as needed.
Said first — This is a chapter at the level of physics Physics. The string picture takes as its starting point that a long tube exists (confinement), and in four-dimensional non-abelian Yang–Mills that is not a theorem. This site shows neither confinement nor the mass gap nor the construction of the continuum limit.
- Treating the tube as a single string — the weight of the area
- The Nambu–Goto action — expanding the fluctuations
- The zero-point energy and the Lüscher term — open strings and closed strings
- Detour: 1+2+3+⋯ and −1/12 — the part that does not depend on how we cut off
- The tube thickens logarithmically — a fluctuating string
- The Nambu–Goto levels and short tubes — the range of universality
- The lattice string is rigid, and roughens somewhere — the side with theorems
- The Wulff shape — a tension depending on direction, and the shape
- The droplet of the two-dimensional Ising model — an exactly known tension, and from a square to a circle
- What the string picture hands to mathematics, and what it does not — what is fixed under an assumption, and the assumption itself
Treating the tube as a single string
The flux tube of 7-01 §05, if its thickness is much smaller than the distance of the pair, is from afar a single line. Extended in the direction of Euclidean time, the line sweeps out a surface (the world sheet). The string picture is an effective theory that describes long distances by the fluctuations of this surface Physics. To a surface bounded by the rectangle of the Wilson loop we give a weight fixed by its area .
With the minimal surface alone this is , the area law. The question is what the fluctuations add. As a metaphor, it is the trembling of a stretched membrane. More precisely, (1) is not a formula derived from Yang–Mills but a starting point under the assumption that "a long tube exists, and its low excitations are only transverse fluctuations" (Athenodorou–Bringoltz–Teper 2011 §2; ABT below).
At strong coupling on the lattice (5-02) a formula close to (1) holds, and the weight of one plaquette plays the role of Known. But the area law also comes out for U(1), so it is no evidence of non-abelian confinement (Chatterjee 2018 §4, 5-06).
The Nambu–Goto action
An action proportional to the area is called the Nambu–Goto action (the name is said to be after Nambu and Goto). We describe the surface by coordinates and a perpendicular displacement (static gauge; is the dimension of spacetime). The area of a surface is given by the surface-area formula learnt in multivariable calculus, (, ). Putting in gives the following.
If the fluctuations are gentle, expanding with gives
The second term is a massless free field with components, of the same form as the vibrating string of 2-02 (with at the ends). For a long string the higher terms are suppressed by powers of (ABT §2.1).
Example: the increase in length of a ripple is in the quadratic approximation. With fm and fm this is 0.099 fm (0.092 fm exactly). Multiplying by MeV/fm ( MeV, 7-01 §07) gives about 110 MeV Computed.
The zero-point energy and the Lüscher term
The second term of (3) is the action of a Euclideanised free field. When is long, , so the ground-state energy of the Hamiltonian of the same field gives (4-02). The modes of this field are (). Each mode is a harmonic oscillator of frequency , and even in its lowest state it has the zero-point energy (2-06; ). Summing over the components gives the following.
The sum diverges. Fluctuations finer than a length are outside the effective theory, so we cut off with .
Putting (5) into (4), the first term is , proportional to , and is absorbed into the tension. What remains is the static potential.
is a non-universal constant. At this is , the Lüscher term of 7-01 formula (6) (Lüscher–Symanzik–Weisz 1980, Lüscher 1981). It is a coefficient derived within the effective theory of long tubes, not a mathematical theorem Physics. The term is a finite part that does not diverge, so its coefficient does not depend on . With and , the remainder is , approaching Computed.
Closed strings and the Casimir energy of a cylinder
For a tube wound around a direction of period (flux going round a periodic boundary), occurs in both directions, positive and negative, and the same computation gives the following (ABT formula (9)).
This is the Casimir energy of a free field on a cylinder. Lucini–Teper 2001 extract the lattice with formula (4) of their paper, , and note: 'in using eqn(4) we are assuming that we have linear confinement' (5-08). A rough guide: at fm, MeV is 4.3% of , and at (the lower limit of Lucini–Teper; about 1.22 fm converting with MeV, while Lucini–Teper themselves write ≃1.3 fm) the correction in (7) is 11.6% of the leading term Computed.
Detour: 1+2+3+⋯ and −1/12
A section you may skip.
The sum in the slogan "" diverges. The precise content is the following formula. For a smooth cutoff (, decreasing fast), as ,
The coefficient of the divergent term changes with the cutoff, and does not. The reason is the Euler–Maclaurin formula. It writes the difference between a sum and an integral in terms of derivatives at the end point, and when and its derivatives decrease fast at infinity it takes the following form ( is a Bernoulli number).
For we have , , and the integral is , so the constant term is . The remaining terms are powers and higher. The analytic continuation of the zeta function, , is the same number Known.
| ε | Exponential | Gaussian |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | −0.0832917 | −0.0834169 |
| 0.01 | −0.0833329 | −0.0833342 |
| → 0 | −0.0833333 | −0.0833333 |
The part that changes with the cutoff is absorbed into the tension, and only remains in the coefficient of (for divergent series see also 4-12, 6-12).
The tube thickens logarithmically
The modes of (3) are oscillators with mass and frequency , and the variance in the ground state is . At the midpoint of only odd survive, and . Summing up to gives a logarithm (Lüscher–Münster–Weisz 1981; Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese 2010 formula (3)). It is a formula derived within the effective theory of long tubes Physics.
What is universal is the coefficient of ; is not universal. The thickness grows without bound, but , so from afar it stays a thin line.
ComputedThe numbers in this figure were computed on this machine. Cutoff , the band is , one transverse component. The oscillation is a classical picture, not the quantum fluctuation itself.
| R (lattice spacings) | σ⟨h²⟩ | Increase when R is doubled |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 0.516070 | 0.111626 |
| 1024 | 1.288650 | 0.110318 |
| Prediction of (9) | — | ln2/(2π) = 0.110318 |
ComputedSummed exactly with the closed form for each mode. The increase agrees with (9) to 6 digits.
At the coefficient is 0.053 fm², and doubling increases by only 0.037 fm² Computed. The logarithmic growth has been confirmed on the lattice for SU(2) in (2+1) dimensions (Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese 2010) Physics.
The Nambu–Goto levels and short tubes
The levels of a closed string with no longitudinal momentum can be written in closed form in Nambu–Goto (with the sums of the left- and right-moving excitations both equal to ; ABT formula (21)). It is a formula that comes from naive light-cone quantisation (Aharony–Komargodski cite, as the source of this method, Arvis 1983, which treated a string with fixed ends).
Expanding gives , and returns to (7). The ground state becomes imaginary at , which in is . If the periodic direction is regarded as time, is the temperature (4-02). The number of string states grows exponentially with energy, so above some temperature the sum of the partition function stops converging. This point is called the Hagedorn transition (for the growth of the states, see the detour of 7-05) Physics. ABT write that can be regarded as 'the Hagedorn/deconfining transition in the Nambu-Goto model', and go on to say that pure gauge theories at large do not reach this length. As the length shrinks, a first-order deconfinement transition occurs before it, at (the below Table 3).
| L√σ | σL−π/(3L) | Ground state of (10) | Error of the approximation | n=1 of (10) | E₁−E₀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 | 0.9455 | 0.6824 | +38.6% | 5.0595 | 4.377 |
| 3.0 | 2.6509 | 2.6279 | +0.88% | 5.6602 | 3.032 |
| 6.0 | 5.8255 | 5.8229 | +0.04% | 7.6836 | 1.861 |
ComputedBy formula (10). The length at which the tube disappears on the lattice is the product of and in Table 3 of ABT: SU(3) 1.544, 1.559, SU(5) 1.636, SU(6) 1.676. All are slightly longer than , and the two at larger lie on either side of ABT's 1.65.
How far does universality go? According to Aharony–Komargodski 2013 'all the terms up to (and including) order 1/L^5 are universal': the ground state agrees with (10) up to , the excitations for deviate universally at , and theory-specific terms enter from . These are results derived within the effective theory of long tubes Physics. Of the quantisation in (10) they also write 'There is no rigorous derivation'. ABT measured about 20 levels of closed tubes on the lattice for four-dimensional SU(N), and reported that many are well described by (10) down to short lengths where the expansion does not converge. Some states with ( is the angular momentum about the axis of the tube, the sign under reflection) deviate strongly Physics.
In the last column of Table 3, the first excitation of the string at is of the same order as the glueball of SU(3), (7-01 Table 2) Computed (this does not imply a correspondence). Turning "there is a single scale" into a mathematical sentence is the subject of 7-12.
The lattice string is rigid, and roughens somewhere
On the strong-coupling side of the lattice, shifting part of the surface by one lattice step adds plaquettes, each carrying a small weight . Transverse fluctuations are suppressed exponentially, and the surface stays rigid (flat). In the world of (9) the variance diverges logarithmically, and the surface is rough.
For crystal surfaces there is a roughening transition between the two. Itzykson–Peskin–Zuber 1980 argued that in four-dimensional lattice gauge theory too, roughening occurs at a finite coupling without any phase transition of the vacuum, and that has an essential singularity there. An essential singularity here is a singularity of the kind where the function and all its derivatives stay finite, but the Taylor expansion no longer represents the function at that point. An example is the function set to for and for ; its Taylor series at has all coefficients . However far the series is extended, this point cannot be seen. IPZ write 'The roughening transition is a natural barrier to the extrapolation of strong-coupling series for the string tension'. For SU(2), is about 2 (with a large error), and the authors note that their four-dimensional argument is 'for the most part, intuitive' Physics.
The three-dimensional Z(2) gauge theory is dual to the three-dimensional Ising model. Dual means that under a change of variables the partition functions of the two models agree (up to simple factors) (the detour of 2-09; IPZ cite Wegner 1971). Under this correspondence the surface of a Wilson loop becomes an interface of the Ising model (IPZ formula (8)) Known. Measuring the gauge coupling by (in terms of the temperature of the dual Ising model, ; IPZ formula (7)), the phase transition is at . The roughening point, by the series estimate IPZ cite, is , before the phase transition Physics. The effective string theory applies only on the rough side (Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese 2010) Physics.
The Wulff shape
On the rigid side of §07, the tension also depends on direction. The edge of a Wilson loop at angle to the lattice axes becomes a staircase, and the minimal surface has plaquettes. At leading order in strong coupling this gives the following.
At it is times larger Computed. In the continuum limit rotation symmetry is expected to return and the tension to become constant Physics.
What shape does a region of fixed area (a two-dimensional droplet) take when it is enclosed by a line whose tension depends on direction? With the tension for each normal , we minimise with the enclosed area fixed. The answer is given by the construction of Wulff 1901 (bibliographic data for the proof that the construction gives the minimum is in the table of sources) Known.
If the tension is constant the answer is a circle; for of (11) it is the square . The total at area 1 is 4 for the square and for a circle Computed.
The droplet of the two-dimensional Ising model
An example where the direction-dependent tension is known exactly is the Ising model on the square lattice (coupling , 2-09). The of this section is the inverse temperature (; not the of lattice gauge theory). The equilibrium shape of an island of the minority (a droplet) in the low-temperature phase is the following curve (the first exact analysis is attributed to Rottman–Wortis 1981) Known.
(13) is the boundary of in (12) itself. Its size too is as in (12): the extent in the direction equals the tension (in units of ). So are not positions but coordinates measured in units of energy. The intercept with the axis (the tension in the axis direction) agrees to 5 digits with from Onsager's exact solution Computed. As , (13) becomes a square, and the tension is the same staircase count as in (11). As the right-hand side approaches 2, and for , we have , so it becomes a circle.
| T/T_c | τ(45°)/τ(0°) | Isoperimetric ratio | Wulff/circle |
|---|---|---|---|
| → 0 | 1.4142 | 0.7854 | 0.8862 |
| 0.2 | 1.1984 | 0.9406 | 0.9698 |
| 0.4 | 1.0690 | 0.9917 | 0.9958 |
| 0.8 | 1.0035 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
ComputedThe numbers in this figure and table were computed on this machine ((13) solved by bisection for each angle).
At low temperature the diagonal tension falls first. A stepped edge has a number of arrangements (entropy), and the corners round off from there. Approaching the correlation length becomes much longer than the lattice spacing, the orientation of the lattice is forgotten, and the shape becomes a circle. This is how the expectation that rotation symmetry returns in the continuum limit (5-05) looks in an exactly tractable model.
That the droplet takes the Wulff shape in the low-temperature two-dimensional Ising model has been shown from the microscopic model (Dobrushin–Kotecký–Shlosman 1992, 1993) Known.
The Wulff problem applies directly to droplets of a two-dimensional phase with fixed area like this one. A closed ring of flux in Yang–Mills has no constraint fixing its area, and left alone it shrinks. Still, a closed tube on the lattice must turn corners, so its energy depends on its shape through Physics. How this is used in the record kept on this machine is in 10-02.
What the string picture hands to mathematics, and what it does not
What it hands over
PhysicsIf a long tube is assumed to exist, the Lüscher coefficient, the coefficient of in the thickness, and the form of the levels up to are fixed independently of the details.
KnownFor the low-temperature two-dimensional Ising model, the relation between the direction-dependent tension and the shape of the droplet is a theorem.
What it does not hand over
That a tube exists (the area law at large ) 'remains elusive' for the four-dimensional non-abelian theory (Chatterjee 2018). The lattice is extracted by subtracting the string correction, and Lucini–Teper, fitting only two points, note: 'we cannot claim to have evidence for both the 1/L functional form and for its coefficient'.
The string picture is about massless transverse fluctuations, and the glueball masses do not come out of it directly. ABT examine the possibility that the levels that deviate from (10) represent 'the massive modes associated with the internal structure of the flux tube' Physics. Since the only length scale is , looks natural, but it is not derived (7-01 §09, 7-12). The view as a sum over surfaces appears in the next chapter, 7-04, as the expansion.
What this chapter can say
| What is said | What is not said |
|---|---|
| PhysicsThe universality, derived within the effective theory that assumes a long tube exists, of the Lüscher coefficient, the coefficient of in the thickness, and the levels up to | That a long tube exists in four-dimensional non-abelian Yang–Mills (the area law at large ) |
| ComputedThat differences of regularisation enter only the term proportional to (Table 1). The increase in thickness of the lattice free field (Table 2) | A theorem on the thickness of the Yang–Mills tube |
| ComputedThe difference between (10) and the Lüscher approximation, , (Table 3) | That (10) is exact for Yang–Mills |
| KnownThe Wulff construction and its justification for the low-temperature two-dimensional Ising model. ComputedTable 4 | That becomes constant in the four-dimensional continuum limit |
KnownThe area law at strong coupling (Osterwalder–Seiler). The duality between the three-dimensional Z(2) gauge theory and the Ising model. by Euler–Maclaurin | Extending the strong-coupling series beyond the roughening point |
PhysicsThe roughening transition of four-dimensional lattice gauge theory (the argument of IPZ), and the series estimate of for three-dimensional Z(2) | A proof of the existence and location of the roughening transition |
Sources and reproduction
| Item | Kind | Source / tools |
|---|---|---|
| §01, (7)(10), , the Hagedorn sentence and , | Primary | Athenodorou–Bringoltz–Teper, JHEP 1102 (2011) 030, arXiv:1007.4720 (text) |
| The order of universality, the caveat on (10), that (10) comes from naive light-cone quantisation | Primary | Aharony–Komargodski, JHEP 05 (2013) 118, arXiv:1302.6257 (text) |
| The original sources of the Lüscher term and (10) | Primary | Lüscher–Symanzik–Weisz, NPB 173 (1980) 365 (bibliographic data only). Lüscher, NPB 180 (1981) 317 (bibliographic data only). Arvis, PLB 127 (1983) 106 "The Exact q Anti-q Potential In Nambu String Theory" (bibliographic data only; taken from reference [19] of Aharony–Komargodski). The original source of the name Nambu–Goto not checked |
| Formula (9), that effective string theory applies on the rough side | Primary | Lüscher–Münster–Weisz, NPB 180 (1981) 1 (bibliographic data only). Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese, PRL 104 (2010) 232001, arXiv:1002.4888 (text) |
| Extraction of the lattice σ, | Primary | Lucini–Teper, JHEP 0106 (2001) 050, hep-lat/0103027 §4.1 (text). The original reads 'r ≥ 3/√σ ≃ 1.3 fm'. The 1.22 fm in the text is the conversion with MeV (the same as 7-01) |
| The roughening transition, , , , duality | Primary | Itzykson–Peskin–Zuber, PLB 95 (1980) 259 (text). is formula (7) of that paper, is in its text. is the value from the series analysis of Weeks et al. that IPZ cite at formula (13) (an estimate as of 1980; the original sources of Weeks et al. are references [7][9] of IPZ, one an unpublished communication; not checked). In IPZ's own quantity, formula (19) gives . Duality: Wegner, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 2259 (bibliographic data only; from the reference list of IPZ) |
| The status of the area law | Primary | Chatterjee arXiv:1803.01950 §4 (text). Osterwalder–Seiler, Ann. Phys. 110 (1978) 440 (bibliographic data only) |
| Formula (12), the microscopic justification of the Wulff shape | Primary | Wulff, Z. Kristallogr. 34 (1901) 449–530 (bibliographic data only; taken from the reference list of Fujimoto–Otsuka). The original source of the proof that the construction gives the minimum not checked. Explanation of the construction: Günther–Rikvold–Novotny, Physica A 212 (1994) 194, cond-mat/9406114 (text), and the review cited there, Rottman–Wortis, Phys. Rep. 103 (1984) 59 (bibliographic data only). Dobrushin–Kotecký–Shlosman, Wulff Construction: A Global Shape from Local Interaction, AMS Transl. Math. Monographs 104 (1992). The same authors' short paper A microscopic justification of the Wulff construction, J. Stat. Phys. 72 (1993) 1–14 (both bibliographic data only; checked on Crossref) |
| Formula (13) | Primary | Rottman–Wortis, PRB 24 (1981) 6274 (bibliographic data only; the attribution "the first exact analysis" is from the introduction of Fujimoto–Otsuka arXiv:1906.01925). Also Avron–van Beijeren–Schulman–Zia, J. Phys. A 15 (1982) L81, Zia–Avron, PRB 25 (1982) 2042 (bibliographic data only; listed by the same introduction as 'see also'). The shape checked against Onsager's tension |
| Tables 1–4, Figures 1 and 2, the Computed items in the text | Computed | python3 (standard library): regularised sums / the lattice free field / (10) and Table 3 of ABT / bisection for (13) |
Next chapter to read: 7-04 Large N — a view that organises the sum over surfaces by .
← 7-02 Mechanisms of confinementContents7-04 Large N →