computo ergo sum

2026-10-01 · chapter Yang–Mills and the mass gapPart 7 From the side of physicseffective string theory

The whole book Contents and reading orders
  1. Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
  2. 0-01 How to read this book
  3. 0-02 One picture
  4. 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
  5. 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
  6. Part 1 Mathematical preparation
  7. 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
  8. 1-02 What a group is
  9. 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
  10. 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
  11. 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
  12. 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
  13. 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
  14. 1-08 Probability and measure
  15. 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
  16. 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
  17. 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
  18. 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
  19. Part 2 Physical preparation
  20. 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
  21. 2-02 The idea of a field
  22. 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
  23. 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
  24. 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
  25. 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
  26. 2-07 The idea of the path integral
  27. 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
  28. 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
  29. 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
  30. Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
  31. 3-01 The gauge principle
  32. 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
  33. 3-03 The action and the equations
  34. 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
  35. 3-05 Instantons and topology
  36. 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
  37. 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
  38. Part 4 Quantisation
  39. 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
  40. 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
  41. 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
  42. 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
  43. 4-05 The algebra of divergences
  44. 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
  45. 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
  46. 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
  47. 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
  48. 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
  49. 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
  50. 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
  51. Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
  52. 5-01 Wilson's lattice
  53. 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
  54. 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
  55. 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
  56. 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
  57. 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
  58. 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
  59. 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
  60. 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
  61. 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
  62. 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
  63. Part 6 Constructive field theory
  64. 6-01 What constructive field theory is
  65. 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
  66. 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
  67. 6-04 The cluster expansion
  68. 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
  69. 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
  70. 6-07 Four dimensions
  71. 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
  72. 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
  73. 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
  74. 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
  75. 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
  76. Part 7 From the side of physics
  77. 7-01 How physics sees it
  78. 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
  79. 7-03 The string picture
  80. 7-04 Large N
  81. 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
  82. 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
  83. 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
  84. 7-08 Holography
  85. 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
  86. 7-10 Back to four dimensions
  87. 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
  88. 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
  89. 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
  90. Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
  91. 8-01 How to read the dictionary
  92. 8-02 Dictionary A
  93. 8-03 Dictionary B
  94. 8-04 Dictionary C
  95. 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
  96. Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
  97. 9-01 How far the world has come
  98. 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
  99. 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
  100. 9-04 The list of open tasks
  101. 9-05 Common misconceptions
  102. Part 10 Towards a proof of the mass gap — building the first step of the staircase
  103. 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
  104. 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption H
  105. 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
  106. 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
  107. 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
  108. 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
  109. 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
  110. 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
  111. 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
  112. 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
  113. 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
  114. 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
  115. 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
  116. 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
  117. 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
  118. 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
  119. 10-16 What is not claimed
  120. 10-17 Insights and small questions
  121. Part 11 Further considerations — beyond Assumption H, and other views
  122. 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
  123. 11-01 One form that obstructs H — a nearly conserved global quantity
  124. 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
  125. 11-03 Two ways to repair H — the sector H and the local H
  126. 11-04 Which H the one-sided bridge needs
  127. 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
  128. 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
  129. 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
  130. 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
  131. 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
  132. Appendices
  133. A-01 Table of notation
  134. A-02 Glossary
  135. A-03 Guide to the literature
  136. A-04 Lean and machine checking
  137. A-05 How this book was made
  138. A-06 Index of assumptions

The string picture — treating the tube of confinement as a single string, a universal correction and a shape come out of its fluctuations

What this chapter shows — We follow how the Lüscher term −π(d−2)/(24R)-\pi(d-2)/(24R) comes out of the zero-point energy of the transverse fluctuations of the tube, and why its coefficient does not depend on the details of the theory. With formulas, moving figures and computations we look at the thickness of the tube, the Nambu–Goto levels, the "rigid side" and the "rough side" of the lattice string, and the shape selected by a tension that depends on direction (the Wulff shape).

Prerequisite chapters — 7-01 How physics sees it (Wilson loops, the area law, the string tension σ\sigma). The zero-point energy (2-06) and the strong-coupling expansion (5-02) are written on the spot as far as needed.

Said first — This is a chapter at the level of physics Physics. The string picture takes as its starting point that a long tube exists (confinement), and in four-dimensional non-abelian Yang–Mills that is not a theorem. This site shows neither confinement nor the mass gap nor the construction of the continuum limit.

The order of this chapter
  1. Treating the tube as a single string — the weight of the area
  2. The Nambu–Goto action — expanding the fluctuations
  3. The zero-point energy and the Lüscher term — open strings and closed strings
  4. Detour: 1+2+3+⋯ and −1/12 — the part that does not depend on how we cut off
  5. The tube thickens logarithmically — a fluctuating string
  6. The Nambu–Goto levels and short tubes — the range of universality
  7. The lattice string is rigid, and roughens somewhere — the side with theorems
  8. The Wulff shape — a tension depending on direction, and the shape
  9. The droplet of the two-dimensional Ising model — an exactly known tension, and from a square to a circle
  10. What the string picture hands to mathematics, and what it does not — what is fixed under an assumption, and the assumption itself

01

Treating the tube as a single string

The flux tube of 7-01 §05, if its thickness is much smaller than the distance RR of the pair, is from afar a single line. Extended in the direction of Euclidean time, the line sweeps out a surface (the world sheet). The string picture is an effective theory that describes long distances by the fluctuations of this surface Physics. To a surface SS bounded by the rectangle R×TR\times T of the Wilson loop we give a weight fixed by its area A(S)A(S).

⟨WR,T⟩  ≈  ∑S: ∂S=rectanglee−σA(S)(1)\langle W_{R,T}\rangle \;\approx\; \sum_{S:\ \partial S=\text{rectangle}} e^{-\sigma A(S)} \tag{1}

With the minimal surface alone this is e−σRTe^{-\sigma RT}, the area law. The question is what the fluctuations add. As a metaphor, it is the trembling of a stretched membrane. More precisely, (1) is not a formula derived from Yang–Mills but a starting point under the assumption that "a long tube exists, and its low excitations are only transverse fluctuations" (Athenodorou–Bringoltz–Teper 2011 §2; ABT below).

At strong coupling on the lattice (5-02) a formula close to (1) holds, and the weight uu of one plaquette plays the role of e−σ0e^{-\sigma_0} Known. But the area law also comes out for U(1), so it is no evidence of non-abelian confinement (Chatterjee 2018 §4, 5-06).

02

The Nambu–Goto action

An action proportional to the area is called the Nambu–Goto action (the name is said to be after Nambu and Goto). We describe the surface by coordinates t,xt,x and a perpendicular displacement h(t,x)∈Rd−2h(t,x)\in\mathbb{R}^{d-2} (static gauge; dd is the dimension of spacetime). The area of a surface X(t,x)X(t,x) is given by the surface-area formula learnt in multivariable calculus, ∫ ⁣ ⁣∫∣Xt∣2∣Xx∣2−(Xt⋅Xx)2 dt dx\int\!\!\int\sqrt{|X_t|^2|X_x|^2-(X_t\cdot X_x)^2}\,dt\,dx (Xt=∂tXX_t=\partial_tX, Xx=∂xXX_x=\partial_xX). Putting in X=(t,x,h)X=(t,x,h) gives the following.

A=∫0T ⁣ ⁣dt∫0R ⁣ ⁣dx 1+∣∂th∣2+∣∂xh∣2+∣∂th∣2∣∂xh∣2−(∂th⋅∂xh)2(2)A=\int_0^T\!\!dt\int_0^R\!\!dx\,\sqrt{1+|\partial_t h|^2+|\partial_x h|^2+|\partial_t h|^2|\partial_x h|^2-(\partial_t h\cdot\partial_x h)^2} \tag{2}

If the fluctuations are gentle, expanding with 1+z≈1+z/2\sqrt{1+z}\approx 1+z/2 gives

σA=σRT+σ2∫ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣∫(∣∂th∣2+∣∂xh∣2) dt dx+O((∂h)4)(3)\sigma A=\sigma RT+\frac{\sigma}{2}\int\!\!\!\int\big(|\partial_t h|^2+|\partial_x h|^2\big)\,dt\,dx+O\big((\partial h)^4\big) \tag{3}

The second term is a massless free field with d−2d-2 components, of the same form as the vibrating string of 2-02 (with h=0h=0 at the ends). For a long string the higher terms are suppressed by powers of 1/(σR2)1/(\sigma R^2) (ABT §2.1).

Example: the increase in length of a ripple h=A0sin⁡(πx/R)h=A_0\sin(\pi x/R) is π2A02/(4R)\pi^2A_0^2/(4R) in the quadratic approximation. With R=1R=1 fm and A0=0.2A_0=0.2 fm this is 0.099 fm (0.092 fm exactly). Multiplying by σ=1192\sigma=1192 MeV/fm (σ=485\sqrt\sigma=485 MeV, 7-01 §07) gives about 110 MeV Computed.

03

The zero-point energy and the Lüscher term

The second term of (3) is the action of a Euclideanised free field. When TT is long, ⟨WR,T⟩≈e−V(R)T\langle W_{R,T}\rangle\approx e^{-V(R)T}, so the ground-state energy of the Hamiltonian of the same field gives V(R)V(R) (4-02). The modes of this field are kn=nπ/Rk_n=n\pi/R (n=1,2,…n=1,2,\dots). Each mode is a harmonic oscillator of frequency knk_n, and even in its lowest state it has the zero-point energy kn/2k_n/2 (2-06; ℏ=c=1\hbar=c=1). Summing over the d−2d-2 components gives the following.

E0(R)=σR+d−22∑n=1∞nπR(4)E_0(R)=\sigma R+\frac{d-2}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n\pi}{R} \tag{4}

The sum diverges. Fluctuations finer than a length aa are outside the effective theory, so we cut off with e−knae^{-k_na}.

∑n≥1n e−εn=e−ε(1−e−ε)2=1ε2−112+ε2240−⋯ ,ε=πaR(5)\sum_{n\ge1}n\,e^{-\varepsilon n}=\frac{e^{-\varepsilon}}{(1-e^{-\varepsilon})^2}=\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}-\frac{1}{12}+\frac{\varepsilon^2}{240}-\cdots,\qquad \varepsilon=\frac{\pi a}{R} \tag{5}

Putting (5) into (4), the first term is (d−2)R/(2πa2)(d-2)R/(2\pi a^2), proportional to RR, and is absorbed into the tension. What remains is the static potential.

V(R)=σR+c0−π(d−2)24R+⋯(6)V(R)=\sigma R+c_0-\frac{\pi(d-2)}{24R}+\cdots \tag{6}

c0c_0 is a non-universal constant. At d=4d=4 this is −π/(12R)-\pi/(12R), the Lüscher term of 7-01 formula (6) (Lüscher–Symanzik–Weisz 1980, Lüscher 1981). It is a coefficient derived within the effective theory of long tubes, not a mathematical theorem Physics. The 1/R1/R term is a finite part that does not diverge, so its coefficient does not depend on aa. With R=1R=1 and a=0.2, 0.1, 0.05a=0.2,\,0.1,\,0.05, the remainder is −0.2567, −0.2605, −0.2615-0.2567,\,-0.2605,\,-0.2615, approaching −π/12-\pi/12 Computed.

Closed strings and the Casimir energy of a cylinder

For a tube wound around a direction of period LL (flux going round a periodic boundary), kn=2πn/Lk_n=2\pi n/L occurs in both directions, positive and negative, and the same computation gives the following (ABT formula (9)).

E0(L)=σL−π(d−2)6L+⋯(7)E_0(L)=\sigma L-\frac{\pi(d-2)}{6L}+\cdots \tag{7}

This is the Casimir energy of a free field on a cylinder. Lucini–Teper 2001 extract the lattice σ\sigma with formula (4) of their paper, aml=a2σL−π/(3L)am_l=a^2\sigma L-\pi/(3L), and note: 'in using eqn(4) we are assuming that we have linear confinement' (5-08). A rough guide: at R=1R=1 fm, π/(12R)≈52\pi/(12R)\approx52 MeV is 4.3% of σR\sigma R, and at Lσ=3L\sqrt\sigma=3 (the lower limit of Lucini–Teper; about 1.22 fm converting with σ=485\sqrt\sigma=485 MeV, while Lucini–Teper themselves write ≃1.3 fm) the correction in (7) is 11.6% of the leading term Computed.

04

Detour: 1+2+3+⋯ and −1/12

Detour

A section you may skip.

The sum in the slogan "1+2+3+⋯=−1/121+2+3+\cdots=-1/12" diverges. The precise content is the following formula. For a smooth cutoff ff (f(0)=1f(0)=1, decreasing fast), as ε→0\varepsilon\to0,

∑n≥1n f(εn)=Cfε2−112+O(ε2),Cf=∫0∞xf(x) dx(8)\sum_{n\ge1}n\,f(\varepsilon n)=\frac{C_f}{\varepsilon^2}-\frac{1}{12}+O(\varepsilon^2),\qquad C_f=\int_0^\infty x f(x)\,dx \tag{8}

The coefficient CfC_f of the divergent term changes with the cutoff, and −1/12-1/12 does not. The reason is the Euler–Maclaurin formula. It writes the difference between a sum and an integral in terms of derivatives at the end point, and when gg and its derivatives decrease fast at infinity it takes the following form (B2=1/6B_2=1/6 is a Bernoulli number).

∑n≥0g(n)=∫0∞g(x) dx+12g(0)−B22! g′(0)−⋯\sum_{n\ge0}g(n)=\int_0^\infty g(x)\,dx+\tfrac12g(0)-\tfrac{B_2}{2!}\,g'(0)-\cdots

For g(x)=xf(εx)g(x)=xf(\varepsilon x) we have g(0)=0g(0)=0, g′(0)=f(0)=1g'(0)=f(0)=1, and the integral is Cf/ε2C_f/\varepsilon^2, so the constant term is −B2/2=−1/12-B_2/2=-1/12. The remaining terms are powers ε2\varepsilon^2 and higher. The analytic continuation of the zeta function, ζ(−1)=−1/12\zeta(-1)=-1/12, is the same number Known.

ComputedTable 1 The sum minus Cf/ε2C_f/\varepsilon^2 (exponential f=e−xf=e^{-x}, Cf=1C_f=1; Gaussian f=e−x2f=e^{-x^2}, Cf=1/2C_f=1/2)
εExponentialGaussian
0.1−0.0832917−0.0834169
0.01−0.0833329−0.0833342
→ 0−0.0833333−0.0833333

The part that changes with the cutoff is absorbed into the tension, and only −1/12-1/12 remains in the coefficient of 1/R1/R (for divergent series see also 4-12, 6-12).

05

The tube thickens logarithmically

The modes qnq_n of (3) are oscillators with mass σ\sigma and frequency knk_n, and the variance in the ground state is 1/(2σkn)1/(2\sigma k_n). At the midpoint of h=∑n2/R qnsin⁡knxh=\sum_n\sqrt{2/R}\,q_n\sin k_nx only odd nn survive, and ⟨h2⟩=∑n odd1/(σπn)\langle h^2\rangle=\sum_{n\,\text{odd}}1/(\sigma\pi n). Summing up to n≲R/an\lesssim R/a gives a logarithm (Lüscher–Münster–Weisz 1981; Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese 2010 formula (3)). It is a formula derived within the effective theory of long tubes Physics.

w2 ⁣(R2)=⟨∣h(R/2)∣2⟩≈d−22πσln⁡RR0(9)w^2\!\left(\tfrac R2\right)=\big\langle|h(R/2)|^2\big\rangle\approx\frac{d-2}{2\pi\sigma}\ln\frac{R}{R_0} \tag{9}

What is universal is the coefficient of ln⁡R\ln R; R0R_0 is not universal. The thickness grows without bound, but w/R→0w/R\to0, so from afar it stays a thin line.

Figure 1 Changing the distance R with the knob changes the number of modes on the string and the width of the fluctuation (the band). "Play" makes each mode oscillate with its zero-point size
R√σ = 4.00

ComputedThe numbers in this figure were computed on this machine. Cutoff a=0.25/σa=0.25/\sqrt\sigma, the band is ±w\pm w, one transverse component. The oscillation is a classical picture, not the quantum fluctuation itself.

Table 2 Variance of the free field at the midpoint of a lattice strip (width R, h=0 at both ends, infinite time) (one component, in units of 1/σ)
R (lattice spacings)σ⟨h²⟩Increase when R is doubled
80.5160700.111626
10241.2886500.110318
Prediction of (9)—ln2/(2π) = 0.110318

ComputedSummed exactly with the closed form 1/m2(m2+4)1/\sqrt{m^2(m^2+4)} for each mode. The increase agrees with (9) to 6 digits.

At d=4d=4 the coefficient 1/(πσ)1/(\pi\sigma) is 0.053 fm², and doubling RR increases w2w^2 by only 0.037 fm² Computed. The logarithmic growth has been confirmed on the lattice for SU(2) in (2+1) dimensions (Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese 2010) Physics.

06

The Nambu–Goto levels and short tubes

The levels of a closed string with no longitudinal momentum can be written in closed form in Nambu–Goto (with the sums of the left- and right-moving excitations both equal to nn; ABT formula (21)). It is a formula that comes from naive light-cone quantisation (Aharony–Komargodski cite, as the source of this method, Arvis 1983, which treated a string with fixed ends).

En(L)=σ2L2+8πσ(n−d−224)(10)E_n(L)=\sqrt{\sigma^2L^2+8\pi\sigma\Big(n-\frac{d-2}{24}\Big)} \tag{10}

Expanding gives σL+4πL(n−d−224)+⋯\sigma L+\frac{4\pi}{L}\big(n-\frac{d-2}{24}\big)+\cdots, and n=0n=0 returns to (7). The ground state becomes imaginary at σL2<π(d−2)/3\sigma L^2\lt\pi(d-2)/3, which in d=4d=4 is LHσ=2π/3=1.447L_H\sqrt\sigma=\sqrt{2\pi/3}=1.447. If the periodic direction is regarded as time, 1/L1/L is the temperature (4-02). The number of string states grows exponentially with energy, so above some temperature the sum of the partition function stops converging. This point is called the Hagedorn transition (for the growth of the states, see the detour of 7-05) Physics. ABT write that LHL_H can be regarded as 'the Hagedorn/deconfining transition in the Nambu-Goto model', and go on to say that pure gauge theories at large NN do not reach this length. As the length shrinks, a first-order deconfinement transition occurs before it, at lcσ=σ/Tc≃1.65l_c\sqrt\sigma=\sqrt\sigma/T_c\simeq1.65 (the lcl_c below Table 3).

Table 3 Energies of the closed string (d=4d=4, in units of σ\sqrt\sigma)
L√σσL−π/(3L)Ground state of (10)Error of the approximationn=1 of (10)E₁−E₀
1.60.94550.6824+38.6%5.05954.377
3.02.65092.6279+0.88%5.66023.032
6.05.82555.8229+0.04%7.68361.861

ComputedBy formula (10). The length lcσl_c\sqrt\sigma at which the tube disappears on the lattice is the product of aσa\sqrt\sigma and lc/al_c/a in Table 3 of ABT: SU(3) 1.544, 1.559, SU(5) 1.636, SU(6) 1.676. All are slightly longer than LHL_H, and the two at larger NN lie on either side of ABT's 1.65.

How far does universality go? According to Aharony–Komargodski 2013 'all the terms up to (and including) order 1/L^5 are universal': the ground state agrees with (10) up to 1/L51/L^5, the excitations for d>3d\gt3 deviate universally at 1/L51/L^5, and theory-specific terms enter from 1/L71/L^7. These are results derived within the effective theory of long tubes Physics. Of the quantisation in (10) they also write 'There is no rigorous derivation'. ABT measured about 20 levels of closed tubes on the lattice for four-dimensional SU(N), and reported that many are well described by (10) down to short lengths where the 1/L1/L expansion does not converge. Some states with JP=0−J^P=0^- (JJ is the angular momentum about the axis of the tube, PP the sign under reflection) deviate strongly Physics.

In the last column of Table 3, the first excitation 3.03σ3.03\sqrt\sigma of the string at Lσ=3L\sqrt\sigma=3 is of the same order as the 0++0^{++} glueball of SU(3), 3.405σ3.405\sqrt\sigma (7-01 Table 2) Computed (this does not imply a correspondence). Turning "there is a single scale" into a mathematical sentence is the subject of 7-12.

07

The lattice string is rigid, and roughens somewhere

On the strong-coupling side of the lattice, shifting part of the surface by one lattice step adds plaquettes, each carrying a small weight uu. Transverse fluctuations are suppressed exponentially, and the surface stays rigid (flat). In the world of (9) the variance diverges logarithmically, and the surface is rough.

For crystal surfaces there is a roughening transition between the two. Itzykson–Peskin–Zuber 1980 argued that in four-dimensional lattice gauge theory too, roughening occurs at a finite coupling without any phase transition of the vacuum, and that σ(β)\sigma(\beta) has an essential singularity there. An essential singularity here is a singularity of the kind where the function and all its derivatives stay finite, but the Taylor expansion no longer represents the function at that point. An example is the function set to e−1/x2e^{-1/x^2} for x>0x\gt0 and 00 for x≤0x\le0; its Taylor series at x=0x=0 has all coefficients 00. However far the series is extended, this point cannot be seen. IPZ write 'The roughening transition is a natural barrier to the extrapolation of strong-coupling series for the string tension'. For SU(2), βr\beta_r is about 2 (with a large error), and the authors note that their four-dimensional argument is 'for the most part, intuitive' Physics.

The three-dimensional Z(2) gauge theory is dual to the three-dimensional Ising model. Dual means that under a change of variables the partition functions of the two models agree (up to simple factors) (the detour of 2-09; IPZ cite Wegner 1971). Under this correspondence the surface of a Wilson loop becomes an interface of the Ising model (IPZ formula (8)) Known. Measuring the gauge coupling by t=tanh⁡βt=\tanh\beta (in terms of the temperature of the dual Ising model, t=e−2J/Tt=e^{-2J/T}; IPZ formula (7)), the phase transition is at tc=0.6418t_c=0.6418. The roughening point, by the series estimate IPZ cite, is tr≈0.46t_r\approx0.46, before the phase transition Physics. The effective string theory applies only on the rough side (Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese 2010) Physics.

Key point PhysicsThe theorem on the area law at strong coupling (Osterwalder–Seiler 1978, 5-04) is about the rigid side; the Lüscher term and the logarithmic thickness are about the rough side. Physics holds that between them lies a singularity of σ(β)\sigma(\beta) beyond which the strong-coupling series cannot be extended.
08

The Wulff shape

On the rigid side of §07, the tension also depends on direction. The edge of a Wilson loop at angle θ\theta to the lattice axes becomes a staircase, and the minimal surface has RT(∣cos⁡θ∣+∣sin⁡θ∣)RT(|\cos\theta|+|\sin\theta|) plaquettes. At leading order in strong coupling this gives the following.

σ(θ)=σ0(∣cos⁡θ∣+∣sin⁡θ∣)(11)\sigma(\theta)=\sigma_0\big(|\cos\theta|+|\sin\theta|\big) \tag{11}

At 45∘45^\circ it is 2\sqrt2 times larger Computed. In the continuum limit rotation symmetry is expected to return and the tension to become constant Physics.

What shape does a region of fixed area (a two-dimensional droplet) take when it is enclosed by a line whose tension depends on direction? With the tension τ(n)\tau(\mathbf n) for each normal n\mathbf n, we minimise ∮τ ds\oint\tau\,ds with the enclosed area fixed. The answer is given by the construction of Wulff 1901 (bibliographic data for the proof that the construction gives the minimum is in the table of sources) Known.

Wτ=⋂∣n∣=1{x: x⋅n≤τ(n)},min⁡area=A∮τ ds=2∣Wτ∣ A(12)\mathcal W_\tau=\bigcap_{|\mathbf n|=1}\{\mathbf x:\ \mathbf x\cdot\mathbf n\le\tau(\mathbf n)\},\qquad \min_{\text{area}=A}\oint\tau\,ds=2\sqrt{|\mathcal W_\tau|\,A} \tag{12}

If the tension is constant the answer is a circle; for τ=∣n1∣+∣n2∣\tau=|n_1|+|n_2| of (11) it is the square {max⁡(∣x∣,∣y∣)≤1}\{\max(|x|,|y|)\le1\}. The total at area 1 is 4 for the square and 8/π=4.518/\sqrt\pi=4.51 for a circle Computed.

09

The droplet of the two-dimensional Ising model

An example where the direction-dependent tension is known exactly is the Ising model on the square lattice (coupling JJ, 2-09). The β=1/T\beta=1/T of this section is the inverse temperature (kB=1k_B=1; not the β\beta of lattice gauge theory). The equilibrium shape of an island of the minority (a droplet) in the low-temperature phase is the following curve (the first exact analysis is attributed to Rottman–Wortis 1981) Known.

cosh⁡(βx)+cosh⁡(βy)=sinh⁡(2βJ)+1sinh⁡(2βJ)(13)\cosh(\beta x)+\cosh(\beta y)=\sinh(2\beta J)+\frac{1}{\sinh(2\beta J)} \tag{13}

(13) is the boundary of Wτ\mathcal W_\tau in (12) itself. Its size too is as in (12): the extent max⁡x⋅n\max\mathbf x\cdot\mathbf n in the direction n\mathbf n equals the tension τ(n)\tau(\mathbf n) (in units of JJ). So x,yx,y are not positions but coordinates measured in units of energy. The intercept with the xx axis (the tension in the axis direction) agrees to 5 digits with 2J+β−1ln⁡tanh⁡βJ2J+\beta^{-1}\ln\tanh\beta J from Onsager's exact solution Computed. As T→0T\to0, (13) becomes a square, and the tension is the same staircase count as in (11). As T→TcT\to T_c the right-hand side approaches 2, and for u=βxu=\beta x, v=βyv=\beta y we have cosh⁡u+cosh⁡v≈2+(u2+v2)/2\cosh u+\cosh v\approx2+(u^2+v^2)/2, so it becomes a circle.

Figure 2 Changing the temperature T/T_c with the knob changes the equilibrium shape of the two-dimensional Ising droplet (filled) from a square to a circle. The tension along the axis is normalised to 1; the dotted lines are the square and the circle
T/T_c = 0.30
Table 4 Equilibrium shapes of the two-dimensional Ising model. The isoperimetric ratio is 4π area/perimeter24\pi\,\text{area}/\text{perimeter}^2; the last column is the ratio of the total tension to that of a circular droplet of the same area
T/T_cτ(45°)/τ(0°)Isoperimetric ratioWulff/circle
→ 01.41420.78540.8862
0.21.19840.94060.9698
0.41.06900.99170.9958
0.81.00351.00001.0000

ComputedThe numbers in this figure and table were computed on this machine ((13) solved by bisection for each angle).

At low temperature the diagonal tension falls first. A stepped edge has a number of arrangements (entropy), and the corners round off from there. Approaching TcT_c the correlation length becomes much longer than the lattice spacing, the orientation of the lattice is forgotten, and the shape becomes a circle. This is how the expectation that rotation symmetry returns in the continuum limit (5-05) looks in an exactly tractable model.

That the droplet takes the Wulff shape in the low-temperature two-dimensional Ising model has been shown from the microscopic model (Dobrushin–Kotecký–Shlosman 1992, 1993) Known.

The Wulff problem applies directly to droplets of a two-dimensional phase with fixed area like this one. A closed ring of flux in Yang–Mills has no constraint fixing its area, and left alone it shrinks. Still, a closed tube on the lattice must turn corners, so its energy depends on its shape through σ(θ)\sigma(\theta) Physics. How this is used in the record kept on this machine is in 10-02.

10

What the string picture hands to mathematics, and what it does not

What it hands over

PhysicsIf a long tube is assumed to exist, the Lüscher coefficient, the coefficient of ln⁡R\ln R in the thickness, and the form of the levels up to 1/L51/L^5 are fixed independently of the details.

KnownFor the low-temperature two-dimensional Ising model, the relation between the direction-dependent tension and the shape of the droplet is a theorem.

What it does not hand over

That a tube exists (the area law at large β\beta) 'remains elusive' for the four-dimensional non-abelian theory (Chatterjee 2018). The lattice σ\sigma is extracted by subtracting the string correction, and Lucini–Teper, fitting only two points, note: 'we cannot claim to have evidence for both the 1/L functional form and for its coefficient'.

The string picture is about massless transverse fluctuations, and the glueball masses do not come out of it directly. ABT examine the possibility that the JP=0−J^P=0^- levels that deviate from (10) represent 'the massive modes associated with the internal structure of the flux tube' Physics. Since the only length scale is 1/σ1/\sqrt\sigma, m∼σm\sim\sqrt\sigma looks natural, but it is not derived (7-01 §09, 7-12). The view as a sum over surfaces appears in the next chapter, 7-04, as the 1/N1/N expansion.


What this chapter can say

What is saidWhat is not said
PhysicsThe universality, derived within the effective theory that assumes a long tube exists, of the Lüscher coefficient, the coefficient of ln⁡R\ln R in the thickness, and the levels up to 1/L51/L^5That a long tube exists in four-dimensional non-abelian Yang–Mills (the area law at large β\beta)
ComputedThat differences of regularisation enter only the term proportional to RR (Table 1). The increase in thickness of the lattice free field (Table 2)A theorem on the thickness of the Yang–Mills tube
ComputedThe difference between (10) and the Lüscher approximation, LHL_H, lcl_c (Table 3)That (10) is exact for Yang–Mills
KnownThe Wulff construction and its justification for the low-temperature two-dimensional Ising model. ComputedTable 4That σ(θ)\sigma(\theta) becomes constant in the four-dimensional continuum limit
KnownThe area law at strong coupling (Osterwalder–Seiler). The duality between the three-dimensional Z(2) gauge theory and the Ising model. −1/12-1/12 by Euler–MaclaurinExtending the strong-coupling series beyond the roughening point
PhysicsThe roughening transition of four-dimensional lattice gauge theory (the argument of IPZ), and the series estimate of trt_r for three-dimensional Z(2)A proof of the existence and location of the roughening transition

Sources and reproduction

ItemKindSource / tools
§01, (7)(10), lcl_c, the Hagedorn sentence and lcσ≃1.65l_c\sqrt\sigma\simeq1.65, JP=0−J^P=0^-PrimaryAthenodorou–Bringoltz–Teper, JHEP 1102 (2011) 030, arXiv:1007.4720 (text)
The order of universality, the caveat on (10), that (10) comes from naive light-cone quantisationPrimaryAharony–Komargodski, JHEP 05 (2013) 118, arXiv:1302.6257 (text)
The original sources of the Lüscher term and (10)PrimaryLüscher–Symanzik–Weisz, NPB 173 (1980) 365 (bibliographic data only). Lüscher, NPB 180 (1981) 317 (bibliographic data only). Arvis, PLB 127 (1983) 106 "The Exact q Anti-q Potential In Nambu String Theory" (bibliographic data only; taken from reference [19] of Aharony–Komargodski). The original source of the name Nambu–Goto not checked
Formula (9), that effective string theory applies on the rough sidePrimaryLüscher–Münster–Weisz, NPB 180 (1981) 1 (bibliographic data only). Gliozzi–Pepe–Wiese, PRL 104 (2010) 232001, arXiv:1002.4888 (text)
Extraction of the lattice σ, Lσ≥3L\sqrt\sigma\ge3PrimaryLucini–Teper, JHEP 0106 (2001) 050, hep-lat/0103027 §4.1 (text). The original reads 'r ≥ 3/√σ ≃ 1.3 fm'. The 1.22 fm in the text is the conversion with σ=485\sqrt\sigma=485 MeV (the same as 7-01)
The roughening transition, t=tanh⁡βt=\tanh\beta, tct_c, trt_r, dualityPrimaryItzykson–Peskin–Zuber, PLB 95 (1980) 259 (text). t=tanh⁡β=e−2/Tt=\tanh\beta=e^{-2/T} is formula (7) of that paper, tc=0.6418t_c=0.6418 is in its text. tr≈0.46t_r\approx0.46 is the value tr≈0.4593t_r\approx0.4593 from the series analysis of Weeks et al. that IPZ cite at formula (13) (an estimate as of 1980; the original sources of Weeks et al. are references [7][9] of IPZ, one an unpublished communication; not checked). In IPZ's own quantity, formula (19) gives tr≈0.47t_r\approx0.47. Duality: Wegner, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 2259 (bibliographic data only; from the reference list of IPZ)
The status of the area lawPrimaryChatterjee arXiv:1803.01950 §4 (text). Osterwalder–Seiler, Ann. Phys. 110 (1978) 440 (bibliographic data only)
Formula (12), the microscopic justification of the Wulff shapePrimaryWulff, Z. Kristallogr. 34 (1901) 449–530 (bibliographic data only; taken from the reference list of Fujimoto–Otsuka). The original source of the proof that the construction gives the minimum not checked. Explanation of the construction: Günther–Rikvold–Novotny, Physica A 212 (1994) 194, cond-mat/9406114 (text), and the review cited there, Rottman–Wortis, Phys. Rep. 103 (1984) 59 (bibliographic data only). Dobrushin–Kotecký–Shlosman, Wulff Construction: A Global Shape from Local Interaction, AMS Transl. Math. Monographs 104 (1992). The same authors' short paper A microscopic justification of the Wulff construction, J. Stat. Phys. 72 (1993) 1–14 (both bibliographic data only; checked on Crossref)
Formula (13)PrimaryRottman–Wortis, PRB 24 (1981) 6274 (bibliographic data only; the attribution "the first exact analysis" is from the introduction of Fujimoto–Otsuka arXiv:1906.01925). Also Avron–van Beijeren–Schulman–Zia, J. Phys. A 15 (1982) L81, Zia–Avron, PRB 25 (1982) 2042 (bibliographic data only; listed by the same introduction as 'see also'). The shape checked against Onsager's tension
Tables 1–4, Figures 1 and 2, the Computed items in the textComputedpython3 (standard library): regularised sums / the lattice free field / (10) and Table 3 of ABT / bisection for (13)

Next chapter to read: 7-04 Large N — a view that organises the sum over surfaces by 1/N1/N.

← 7-02 Mechanisms of confinementContents7-04 Large N →

Revised 2026-10-01: first version.