computo ergo sum

2026-10-15 · chapter Yang–Mills and the mass gapPart 14 Closing — conditional statementsquestions, an index by chapter and item number · Kiichi, Shiori and Rin

The whole book Contents and reading orders
  1. Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
  2. 0-01 How to read this book
  3. 0-02 One picture
  4. 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
  5. 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
  6. Part 1 Mathematical preparation
  7. 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
  8. 1-02 What a group is
  9. 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
  10. 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
  11. 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
  12. 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
  13. 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
  14. 1-08 Probability and measure
  15. 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
  16. 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
  17. 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
  18. 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
  19. Part 2 Physical preparation
  20. 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
  21. 2-02 The idea of a field
  22. 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
  23. 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
  24. 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
  25. 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
  26. 2-07 The idea of the path integral
  27. 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
  28. 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
  29. 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
  30. Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
  31. 3-01 The gauge principle
  32. 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
  33. 3-03 The action and the equations
  34. 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
  35. 3-05 Instantons and topology
  36. 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
  37. 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
  38. Part 4 Quantisation
  39. 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
  40. 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
  41. 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
  42. 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
  43. 4-05 The algebra of divergences
  44. 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
  45. 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
  46. 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
  47. 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
  48. 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
  49. 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
  50. 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
  51. Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
  52. 5-01 Wilson's lattice
  53. 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
  54. 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
  55. 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
  56. 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
  57. 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
  58. 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
  59. 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
  60. 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
  61. 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
  62. 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
  63. Part 6 Constructive field theory
  64. 6-01 What constructive field theory is
  65. 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
  66. 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
  67. 6-04 The cluster expansion
  68. 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
  69. 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
  70. 6-07 Four dimensions
  71. 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
  72. 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
  73. 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
  74. 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
  75. 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
  76. Part 7 From the side of physics
  77. 7-01 How physics sees it
  78. 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
  79. 7-03 The string picture
  80. 7-04 Large N
  81. 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
  82. 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
  83. 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
  84. 7-08 Holography
  85. 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
  86. 7-10 Back to four dimensions
  87. 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
  88. 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
  89. 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
  90. Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
  91. 8-01 How to read the dictionary
  92. 8-02 Dictionary A
  93. 8-03 Dictionary B
  94. 8-04 Dictionary C
  95. 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
  96. The map
  97. Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
  98. 9-01 How far the world has come
  99. 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
  100. 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
  101. 9-04 The list of open tasks
  102. 9-05 Common misconceptions
  103. 9-06 The stages a proof must contain — the table of seven stages
  104. The first road — from the direction of time
  105. Part 10 The first road, first half — from the direction of time: the mass gap and the diffusive-relaxation-time assumption
  106. 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
  107. 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption ξ²
  108. 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
  109. 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
  110. 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
  111. 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
  112. 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
  113. 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
  114. 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
  115. 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
  116. 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
  117. 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
  118. 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
  119. 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
  120. 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
  121. 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
  122. 10-16 What is not claimed
  123. 10-17 Insights and small questions
  124. Part 11 The first road, second half — repairing the form of the assumption, making time continuous
  125. 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
  126. 11-01 One form that obstructs Assumption ξ² — a nearly conserved global quantity
  127. 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
  128. 11-03 Two ways to repair Assumption ξ² — the sector Assumption ξ² and the local Assumption ξ²
  129. 11-04 Which Assumption ξ² the one-sided bridge needs
  130. 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
  131. 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
  132. 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
  133. 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
  134. 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
  135. The second road — from the direction of space
  136. Part 12 The second road: from the direction of space — a small twisted T² and confinement
  137. 12-00 Entrance — space, not time
  138. 12-01 The twisted T² and 't Hooft flux
  139. 12-02 Vortices and fractional instantons
  140. 12-03 Containers — conditioning on the frame makes things independent
  141. 12-04 Slab confinement
  142. 12-05 Vortex-insertion identities
  143. 12-06 Driven insertion and the flow lemma
  144. 12-07 Why fixed maps fail
  145. 12-08 The measured record
  146. 12-09 Where this road stops — widening the T² is the band
  147. The crossover band — two roads reach the same wall
  148. Part 13 The crossover band — two roads reach the same wall
  149. 13-00 Entrance — confluence
  150. 13-01 The correct form of the band
  151. 13-02 Reduction to a single inequality
  152. 13-03 The only place where non-abelian enters
  153. 13-04 Structure alone cannot cross
  154. 13-05 The chessboard and simultaneous flips
  155. 13-06 Renormalisation comparison — a comparison that distinguishes groups
  156. 13-07 The band seen from the side of time
  157. 13-08 A map of the roads tried and stopped
  158. 13-09 The measured record
  159. 13-10 Candidate new viewpoints
  160. 13-11 Ultraviolet control — what it means to close at infinitely many steps
  161. Closing
  162. Part 14 Closing — conditional statements
  163. 14-00 Entrance — the promise of this part
  164. 14-01 The conditional statement — the mass gap and confinement, arrow by arrow
  165. 14-02 The ledger of conditions
  166. 14-03 The table of questions (a cross-index)
  167. 14-04 What is not claimed (a cross-index)
  168. Appendices
  169. A-01 Table of notation
  170. A-02 Glossary
  171. A-03 Guide to the literature
  172. A-04 Lean and machine checking
  173. A-05 How this book was made
  174. A-06 Index of assumptions
  175. A-07 Papers that came out of this book

The table of questions (a cross-index)

What this chapter shows — The questions that the parts of this book left open, gathered into one index. The seventeen questions of Part 10 (Q1–Q17), and the nineteen questions (F1–F19) and candidate rules (N1–N6) of Part 11, are looked up by chapter and item number, without moving the items. The questions left by the text of Parts 12 and 13 are given numbers on this page (Question 12a onwards, Question 13a onwards), listed with the section of the chapter they come from and the rows of the ledger of conditions they concern (①–⑩ of 14-02 Table 2, and Outside 1–4 outside the ledger). The two tables of "the next move" listed by the record of the study are also looked up in the language of the ledger rows.

Prerequisite chapters — 14-02 (the ledger of conditions; the numbers and names of the rows are fixed there). The content of the questions is in the chapters in the right-hand column of each row.

Said first — This chapter adds no new results. Questions are questions, not claims. The status of a question (done, partly done, not yet, new) and "what does not move even if settled" are kept only in the tables of the chapters they come from, and are not copied here. Whichever question is settled, the problem of the mass gap does not move. What moves is one row of the ledger, or one label in one chapter.

Order of this chapter
  1. How to read the index — four sources, the numbering convention, correspondence with the ledger rows (Table 1)
  2. The questions of Part 10 — Q1–Q17 (Table 2)
  3. The questions and candidate rules of Part 11 — F1–F19, N1–N6 (Tables 3 and 4)
  4. Questions from Part 12 — Questions 12a–12p (Table 5)
  5. Questions from Part 13 — the assumptions of the reduction of the band, criteria, β-monotonicity and more, Questions 13a–13p (Table 6)
  6. The next moves listed by the record of the study — two tables looked up by ledger row (Table 7)
  7. Looking up from the ledger rows — for each row, the questions that concern it (Table 8)

01

How to read the index — four sources and the numbering convention

The questions have four sources. Table 1 gives, for each source, how the numbers are assigned and the table that the numbers point to. The numbers are those of the source chapter, used as they are and not renumbered on this page. Parts 12 and 13 do not yet have a chapter gathering their questions, so we pick up sentences in the form of questions from the sections "what cannot be said", "what remains" and "what is lacking" of the text of those parts, and number them on this page. The numbers are lower-case letters by part (12a, 12b, … and 13a, 13b, …), chosen so as not to clash with the symbols of other chapters (numbers of propositions, conditions and assumptions).

Table 1 The four sources of the questions
SourceNumbersCountTable to look inHow the size of a question is written
Part 10 (the first road, first half)Q1–Q171710-17 Table 3Tools (SAT, paper, python3, interval arithmetic, Lean, literature) and the form of settlement
Part 11 (the first road, second half)F1–F19, N1–N6 and three combinations19 + 911-08 Table 1, Table 2Kind of work (paper, reading, computation, Lean) and status
Parts 12 and 13 (the second road and the band)Questions 12a–12p, Questions 13a–13p16 + 16Tables 5 and 6 of this pageAs in the sentences of the source sections. No estimate of size is written
"The next move" of the record of the studyOrder 1–7 of the record's table, and order of work 1–47 + 4Table 7 of this pageLooked up after replacing them with the language of the ledger rows

The numbers of the ledger rows are as in 14-02 Table 2: ① ultraviolet control, ② the gap on a small T², ③ uniform acceptance of the insertion, ④ the base point on a small T², ⑤ reflection positivity in z, ⑥ the uniform slab gap (frame decorrelation), ⑦ the renormalisation comparison (breakdown: ⑦a lower end, ⑦b upper end, ⑦c middle, plus the two rows strong-coupling end and one loop), ⑧ the band, ⑨ what remains of the first step, ⑩ the four-dimensional goal (side of time). The differences outside the ledger are Outside 1, the limit to R4\mathbb R^4; Outside 2, joining the area law and the gap; Outside 3, all compact simple groups; Outside 4, verification (14-02 Table 3).

The column "rows concerned" of the tables gives, as this book's arrangement, which ledger rows' content a question would touch if it were settled. Settling a question does not necessarily make a row disappear. A row disappears only when its paper proof has been placed in the book and, if it has a Lean entry, the re-check is done (14-02 §01).

02

The questions of Part 10 — Q1–Q17

The questions of Part 10 are "small questions" expected to be settled at the size of an undergraduate thesis. Table 2 lists only a one-line summary and where to look. The form of settlement and "what does not move when settled" are in each row of 10-17 Table 3. The assumption around which the questions of Part 10 turned is now called the diffusive-relaxation-time assumption (symbol Assumption ξ², upper side ξ²↑, lower side ξ²↓; formerly Assumption H).

Table 2 The questions of Part 10 (summaries; the full text of each row is in 10-17 Table 3)
Q.SummaryToolsRows concernedWhere to look
Q1Does a complete family of k=3k=3 cells exist in d=9d=9?SAT, Lean— (the combinatorics of one-link integration)10-17 Table 3, 10-02 §02
Q2The largest dimension in which a complete family exists, dmax⁡(k)d_{\max}(k)Exhaustive search, paper— (same as above)10-17 Table 3
Q3The constants of 1−λk1-\lambda_k for the Hermite familyPaper, python3— (worked example)10-17 §05
Q4The SU(N)SU(N) version, and the Lean statement, of the saturation of the ratio of functions on the forestPaper, Lean⑩10-17 Table 3
Q5CP(β)C_P(\beta) in the link variables of two-dimensional lattice Yang–MillsPaper, python3⑩ (control)10-17 Table 3
Q6The best constant of the curvature after one-link integration, c∗∈[21,27]c^*\in[21,27]Global optimisation, interval arithmetic— (the strong-coupling side)10-17 Table 3, 5-11
Q7The coefficient of N−3N^{-3} in the column model, analyticallyPaper, python3⑨10-17 Table 3
Q8In the column model, the sign of 1/P1/P at finite uupython3⑨10-17 Table 3
Q9How much does the shortfall c2c_2 change with the choice of gauge in the block transformation?python3⑩10-17 Table 3
Q10CPC_P and ξ2\xi^2 of the two-dimensional O(3)O(3) sigma modelpython3, literature⑩ (an asymptotically free control)10-17 Table 3
Q11CP/ξ2C_P/\xi^2 of the three-dimensional Z2\mathbb Z_2 gauge theorypython3⑩ (control)10-17 Table 3
Q12Monotonicity in volume of CP(V)C_P(V), and boundary conditionspython3⑩10-17 Table 3
Q13Collect the primary sources on the dynamical exponent of local algorithms for four-dimensional SU(2)SU(2)Literature⑩10-17 Table 3
Q14Bound from above, by interval arithmetic, the two-point maximal correlation of stage 2 of the core (8≤k≤148\le k\le14)Interval arithmetic, paper⑨10-17 Table 3, 10-15 Table 1
Q15Read the power of the prefactor ℏ−p\hbar^{-p} of CPC_P for the core by the capacity of the degenerate pointpython3, paper⑨10-17 Table 3
Q16A comparison theorem showing the alternating maximal correlation between boxes calt<1c_{\rm alt}\lt1Paper⑨10-17 Table 3
Q17When a small term that breaks the conservation is added to a dynamics with conservation, the length at which the gap departs from the square of the sidePaper, python3⑩ (the smallest model of Part 11)10-17 Table 3

Reading Table 2. The questions that concern row ⑨ (what remains of the first step) are Q7, Q8, Q14, Q15 and Q16; the questions opened by "the road of blocks and mixing" in the supplement to Part 10 (10-15 §road C) are gathered as Question 13k in Table 6 of Part 13. The questions concerning ⑩ are questions of how to set up the statement of Assumption ξ² on the side of the four-dimensional lattice; whichever of them is settled, ⑩ itself (ξ²↑ and the bridge, uniform as β→∞\beta\to\infty) does not move.

03

The questions and candidate rules of Part 11 — F1–F19, N1–N6

The questions of Part 11 came out of the study that repairs the form of the statement of Assumption ξ² (the length at which conservation breaks, the sector and local versions, the form the one-sided bridge needs, the vacuum measure). Table 3 gives only summaries and where to look; the status (done, partly done, not yet, new) and "what moves and what does not move if settled" are in 11-08 Table 1.

Table 3 The questions of Part 11 (summaries; the full text of each row and its status are in 11-08 Table 1)
Q.SummarySizeWhere to look (the section the question came from)
F1For the free field, compare the excitation energies of observables supported in the boxPaper11-04 §05
F2Monotonicity of the factor that cuts off times, φ(x)/x2\varphi(x)/x^2Elementary, Lean11-04 §03
F3Whether the static ratio catches the slowness, for the sign of the Polyakov loop on a small periodic boxSmall computation11-01 §02
F4For U(1)U(1) on a two-dimensional layer, how the gap decreases as the strip-shaped region is lengthenedComputation11-02 §03
F5Primary sources on the autocorrelation of the topological charge in pure SU(2)SU(2) gauge theoryReading, computation11-07 §07
F6A many-family version of the lemma of two projections, and its condition on maximal correlationPaper11-03 §06
F7inf⁡Hess⁡Vt\inf\operatorname{Hess}V_t of the one-link Wilson weight convolved with the heat kernel, and the flow of the weight of the bad setPaper + small computation11-06 §07
F8For Wilson's transfer operator, show assumption (D) restricted to functions cut off at low energyPaper11-04 §08
F9For finite-state reversible Markov chains, close in Lean τint≤CP\tau_{\rm int}\le C_P and the identity of the ground-state transformationLean11-05 §01
F10Reread the autocorrelations of local modes and topological modes in two-dimensional CPN−1CP^{N-1} through the eyes of the local versionReading, computation11-02 §07
F11For two-dimensional SU(2)SU(2), find λW\lambda_W and Γ\Gamma of families of loops at finite β\betaComputation11-04 §06
F12On a four-dimensional box, the values for families of loops the size of the spanComputation11-04 §06
F13For the 0+1 double well, sandwich the local ratio by a reduction to one dimension with the position of the kink as coordinatePaper + small computation11-04 §07
F14Add one point β=7\beta=7 for the two-dimensional strip-shaped region, and see whether the slope settlesComputation11-02 §05
F15For fields whose ratio lies between the threshold and 1, another argument that sees the mass while staying in the ratio formPaper11-04 §06
F16On Wilson's lattice with discretised time, write the version of the bridge that cuts off times (Proposition W and the lower bound in finite volume) under assumption (D)Paper11-04 §03
F17Whether the Kogut–Susskind Hamiltonian becomes frustration-free when it is split with terms grouped by sectorPaper11-05 §04
F18On the CPN−1CP^{N-1} test bed, add seeds and pairs of NN, and read the exponent of the slowness of the topological modeComputation11-02 §07
F19Measure the definition (2) of the length at which conservation breaks with the charge of a four-dimensional subregionComputation11-02 §01

The summaries of Table 3 are shortened from the sentences of the source table. The terms of Part 11 "window factor" and "window version of the bridge" are restated here as "the factor that cuts off times" and "the version of the bridge that cuts off times", so that they are not confused with the band of Part 13 (note on terms: 13-00 §02). The "strip-shaped region" of F4 and F14 is a width-2 region of a two-dimensional lattice, a different thing from the crossover band. In terms of ledger rows, only F13 touches ⑨; the others are questions that repair the form of the statement of ⑩.

The candidate rules are candidates for the question "if we were to make new mathematics, what would we put as rules?", and each has one question attached (11-08 Table 2). Table 4 lists only the symbol, the name of the rule and where to look. The relation to the three roots of the third step is in 11-08 Table 3.

Table 4 The candidate rules (the one-line candidate and its question are in 11-08 Table 2)
SymbolName of the ruleSection where the candidate came from
N1Axiomatising scale11-07 §06
N2The algebra of loops11-07 §06
N3Conserved quantities and sectors11-03 §04
N4The class of measures that pay with rarity11-06 §07
N5An axiom of asymptotic freedom11-07 §06
N6Rules for curvature (Bakry–Émery on the space of orbits)11-07 §06
N1+N4, N3+N4, N2+N3Three combinationsThe three rows at the bottom of 11-08 Table 2

Seen from the study of Parts 12 and 13, among the candidates N5 (an axiom of asymptotic freedom) and N1 (axiomatising scale) sit closest to the problem of the band. In the statements that cross the band, the place where asymptotic freedom enters is narrowed to one (the β′<β\beta'\lt\beta of the renormalisation comparison, 13-06 §01), and the question of N5 (what follows from the rule of approaching a free field in the ultraviolet) becomes a question of restating that one place in the language of rules. This is an estimate of position; none of the candidates promises a prospect of crossing the band Reading (a physical estimate).

04

Questions from Part 12 — Questions 12a–12p

These are the questions that the text of Part 12 (the second road: from the direction of space) left open. The sentence in each row is the sentence of the source section shortened into the form of a question, with its conditions kept in the same row. The group is SU(2)SU(2), and the small T² carries the 't Hooft twist n12=1n_{12}=1. The questions from the three chapters 12-06 to 12-08 (driven insertion, fixed maps, the measured record) are the five rows at the bottom of the table (12l–12p).

Table 5 Questions from Part 12 (the rows concerned are rows of the ledger of 14-02; this book's arrangement)
Q.Question (with its conditions in the same row)Rows concernedWhat does not move even if settledSource
12aThe converse of Theorem A of Paper 3: at fixed NN, an upper bound by a dilute gas uniform in MM (a bound on the string tension from above). In the draft it is reduced to a single positivity lemma⑦bA bound uniform in NN, the continuum limit12-02 §06, A-07 §05
12bAgreement of the minimal actions S∗(N,ℓ)→Smin⁡(N,∞)S_*(N,\ell)\to S_{\min}(N,\infty) (the minimal action of a column with its frame frozen to the vacuum, and the minimal action of a free fractional instanton). The numbers agree to five digits (a reading)⑦bSame as above12-02 §06
12cOn the twisted T2×R2T^2\times\mathbb R^2, existence of a solution of topological charge 12\tfrac12 attaining the lower bound 4π2/g24\pi^2/g^2 of the action (at present an outline with assumptions)④The rate on the lattice, the band12-02 §02, §07 (c)
12dThe SU(N)SU(N) version of uniqueness of the vacuum that absorbs the twist, the gap of the adjoint field, and the absence of flat configurations in the (1,1) sectorOutside 3Groups without a centre12-01 §09 (c)
12eThe second term when moving to a fixed sector: that the bias of the outer container is typically small (0 as M→∞M\to\infty)⑥A uniform estimate of the container free energy12-03 §04, §08 (b)
12fEstimate the container free energy ΔFj\Delta F_j uniformly over good frames and uniformly in the lattice spacing (needs a multiscale analysis of the conditional measure with the frame held fixed)①, ⑥The band (the stage of widening sideways)12-03 §08 (e)
12gWith the map of a thick vortex, bound the cost of the insertion independently of NN (an improvement of the slab-confinement theorem towards the continuum limit; at present an outline, Assumption)①, ③The band12-04 §04, §07 (c)
12hThe three things lacking between the insertion estimates and the area law: (i) that the event that insertions are refused simultaneously in all cells is exponentially rare in the number of cells, (ii) that the lower bound on the acceptance rate is uniform in the lattice spacing, (iii) an upper bound on the variance of the insertion ratio③The band12-05 §07
12iA negative control that applies the insertion estimates to four-dimensional U(1)U(1) (not confining at weak coupling) and checks where they stop working⑦c (the condition that distinguishes groups)The estimate for SU(2)SU(2)12-05 §07, §08 (f)
12jThat the map composing insertions in separate cells satisfies the identity "odd under insertion" (at present an assumption of Theorem 8, and an assumption in Lean too)③The identity for one cell12-05 §08 (c)
12kComparing the slab-confinement theorem with arguments of Tomboulis–Yaffe type and with the area law for spatial Wilson loops at high temperature (Borgs 1985)— (a question about the label)The content of the theorem12-04 §06
12lConstructing a kernel whose flip probability aa is close to 1. The flow lemma θ≤1−a\theta\le1-a gives only a naive form, because for a one-step kernel aa saturates around 12\tfrac12 (a judgement from measurement and the record)⑧ (a form usable for testing the band)Ultraviolet control ①12-06 §06, §08 (d)
12mThe quasi-static limit: that the work WW approaches the conditional free energy of the container as the number of driving steps m→∞m\to\infty (a proof including an estimate of how the kernel mixes)③The band12-06 §04, §08 (b)
12nBound the error of the map that reshapes the fluctuations (the local relative entropy near the vortex surface, and higher loops) at intermediate coupling and for large fields. At one loop it reproduces β−β′=0.258\beta-\beta'=0.258⑦ (from one loop to non-perturbative)The statement that crosses the band itself (⑦c)12-07 §08 (a)
12oWhether the extra ultraviolet cost of fixed maps grows in the same way in four-dimensional gauge theory (whether cancellation by Ward identities occurs). The present numbers are three points in a two-dimensional model①The band12-07 §06, §08 (d)
12pMeasurements that widen the T² beyond the sizes measured (up to about Lσ≈2L\sqrt\sigma\approx2), and an estimate of the errors of driven insertion and replica exchange (the treatment of autocorrelation)— (a question about a reading)Any ledger row (numbers are not proofs)(b)(c) of 12-08 §07

Reading Table 5. 12a and 12b are exactly what remains of ledger ⑦b (the upper end); if they are settled, both sides of the rate match on the lattice at fixed NN, but the direction of increasing NN is the same problem as ⑦c. 12f and 12g are questions that touch the content of ultraviolet control ①, a wall separate from the band (12-00 §02). (ii) of 12h is a restatement of ledger row ③, uniform acceptance of the insertion.

05

Questions from Part 13 — the assumptions of the reduction of the band, criteria, β-monotonicity and more

These are the questions that the text of Part 13 (the crossover band) left open. The first three rows put into question form the three assumptions of the reduction of the band (13-02 §02), and the difficulty of the band is concentrated in the third row, the lateral-widening inequality (13-02 §08). An argument that closes the band must be able to distinguish U(1)U(1) (criterion (m), 13-06 §08). This condition applies to every row of Table 6.

Table 6 Questions from Part 13 (the rows concerned are rows of the ledger of 14-02; this book's arrangement)
Q.Question (with its conditions in the same row)Rows concernedWhat does not move even if settledSource
13aShow the lateral-widening inequality (strong form θ(R;TL′2)≤C(L′/L)2θ(R;TL2)\theta(R;T^2_{L'})\le C(L'/L)^2\theta(R;T^2_L), or the weak form in which the total loss is finite) non-perturbatively across L∼1/ΛL\sim1/\Lambda, between the dilute regime and the confining regime. It does not follow from structural inputs alone (reflection positivity, duality, the transfer matrix)⑧ (the place of the input to the reduction is ⑦)Outside 1–413-02 §02, §08
13bShow frame decorrelation θ(sR;TL2)≤CD θ(R;TL2)s2\theta(sR;T^2_L)\le C_{\rm D}\,\theta(R;T^2_L)^{s^2} uniformly in LL. With LL fixed it is replaced by the chessboard density κcb\kappa_{\rm cb}, so the question becomes a comparison of κcb(L)\kappa_{\rm cb}(L) across scales⑥The non-abelian input to the band (13a)13-02 §02, 14-02 Table 2 ⑥
13cShow the base point on a small T², θ(L0;TL02)≤1−ε0\theta(L_0;T^2_{L_0})\le1-\varepsilon_0, under ultraviolet control and uniform acceptance of the insertion (the expected size ε0∝(L0Λ)11/3\varepsilon_0\propto(L_0\Lambda)^{11/3} is a one-loop estimate)④ (premises ①, ③)The band13-02 §02, 14-01 Table 1 [03]
13dIntermediate milestone (a): ΔF(L,L)→0\Delta F(L,L)\to0 (at any speed). It rules out the known non-confining phases, but gives no uniform lower bound on the tensionPartway to ⑧The mass gap, a uniform tension for the area law13-01 §06, 13-06 §08
13eIntermediate milestone (b): ln⁡(1/θ(L,L))≥cL2/ln⁡L\ln(1/\theta(L,L))\ge cL^2/\ln L (almost an area law; by the Tomboulis–Yaffe inequality, decay faster than the perimeter law)Partway to ⑧A uniform tension13-01 §06
13fβ-monotonicity: ∂βΔF≥0\partial_\beta\Delta F\ge0 with the lattice geometry held fixed. Rewritten in terms of electric flux, it is a problem of the same weight as β\beta-monotonicity of the string tension in lattice units, and as far as we searched, not even β\beta-monotonicity of Wilson-loop expectation values has been shown. In the chain of the band it is not needed if the renormalisation comparison is shown directly⑦ (an auxiliary role)The renormalisation comparison itself13-06 §02
13gChecking that, on a slab with twist n12n_{12}, β-monotonicity for Z2\mathbb Z_2 and U(1)U(1) does not follow from Ginibre's inequality (without the twist it does)⑦β-monotonicity for SU(2)SU(2)13-06 §01
13hThe criterion at the lower end: push confinement and the comparison up to β≈0.3\beta\approx0.3–11, by a finite-size criterion of Dobrushin–Shlosman type using the influence δ(L0,β)\delta(L_0,\beta) on the inside when the centre flux on the boundary of the box is changed, and by a computer-assisted count of the growth constant of admissible surfaces⑦aAbove β≈1\beta\approx1 (the middle)13-06 §04
13iWrite out the bookkeeping of Proposition S at the strong-coupling end (the interaction of volume polyhedra and surface contours), and make the constant u0≈10−80u_0\approx10^{-80} largerThe strong-coupling end of ⑦Beyond roughening (βR≈1.9\beta_R\approx1.9)13-06 §03
13jShow any one of the four faces of the middle (softness in the direction of the twist κw\kappa_w, mixing of the box flux δ(L0)\delta(L_0), the cost of twisting a column f(ℓ)f(\ell), the margin of the pressure) uniformly in the scale, in a form that fails for U(1)U(1). As a preliminary step, test κw\kappa_w and δ(L0)\delta(L_0) numerically with U(1)U(1) as the control⑦cUltraviolet control ①13-06 §07
13kAt each β\beta in the band, the area law on both sides at fixed β\beta (with errors of the order of the perimeter, assumption (A)). If this can be said, the comparison inside the band shrinks to finitely many steps (Lemma 1)⑦The seam between the upper end of the band and ultraviolet control13-06 §06
13lWhat remains of the road of blocks and mixing for the first step: the second and third stages of strong mixing (the Laplace method with constraints), checking against the original sources the Varadhan-type limit, Witten's Morse theory (corners of the Neumann box) and the standard theorem for one-dimensional chains, and interval arithmetic for the curvature at the minimum λ∗(12)\lambda_*(12) and the reach of the optimal path⑨⑩ (⑨ is a miniature, not an implication)10-15 §road C, 13-07 §06
13mWhy, in the first step, the convexity threshold (the first conjugate point at the top, ≈7.84\approx7.84) and the mixing length (about 9) are numerically close⑨⑩13-07 §07 (c)
13nCan the smallest band be crossed: test a tool claimed to cross the band first on two-dimensional asymptotically free models (the O(N)O(N) model at large NN, the Gross–Neveu model), with the ultraviolet cutoff still removed (screening criterion (j). Exponential decay at all temperatures for the two-dimensional O(3)O(3) model is also said to be unsolved; not yet checked)⑧ (a touchstone)The four-dimensional band13-08 §07, Q10
13oThe asymptotic form of the comparison principle for large loops only, σtw(L)≤σ∞\sigma_{\rm tw}(L)\le\sigma_\infty. The form for small loops was broken numerically, but this form has not been refuted (there is no mechanism to show it)⑧The comparison principle for small loops (broken numerically)13-08 §04
13pPut each of the three new candidates (reduction by compactness of the band, log-concavity of the Weyl measure and a height/azimuth decomposition, local step functions of the column) through the tests of the screening criteria⑦cNone of the candidates closes the band13-10 §05, §07

Reading Table 6. 13a–13c are the three assumptions of the reduction theorem (13-02 §03); if all three are in place, the correct form of the band follows. But the three differ in character, and non-abelian dynamics enters only in 13a (13b is replaced by a structural fact once LL is fixed, and 13c is a statement on the weak-coupling side). 13f–13k are the breakdown of the renormalisation comparison (⑦): 13h is the lower end, 13j the middle, 13i the strong-coupling end. 13n–13p are questions coming from the chapters on the roads tried and stopped and on new candidates (13-08, 13-10). 13l and 13m are questions about the first step on the side of time (the first road); even if they are settled, the band does not move (13-07 §04).

06

The next moves listed by the record of the study — two tables looked up by ledger row

Among the material of Parts 12 and 13 there are two tables of "the next move", kept as a record of the study. One lists seven rows in decreasing order of the prospect of closing; the other lists four rows in the order of work. Both are tables in the record, not chapters of the book. Table 7 looks up each of their rows in the language of the ledger rows and the chapters of the book. The "amount of work" scale of the record's tables is a number of prospects, not a number with grounds, so it is not copied.

Table 7 The rows of the record's two tables, with the ledger rows and the chapters of the book (the sentences for the content of each row are on the side of the chapters of the book)
Record's tableOrderContent (in the language of the book)Ledger rowChapter of the book, question on this page
Order of the prospect of closing1What remains of strong mixing for the first step (checking the Varadhan-type limit, a uniform form of the Laplace method with constraints)⑨10-15 §road C, Question 13l
2The logarithmic Sobolev inequality for blocks in the first step (checking Witten's Morse theory and the decomposition against the original sources, interval arithmetic for λ∗\lambda_*)⑨Same as above, Question 13l
3Stitching 1 and 2 together (the standard theorem for one-dimensional chains)⑨Same as above, Question 13l
4The positivity lemma needed for the converse bound of Paper 3 (by a low-temperature cluster expansion at one scale)⑦bQuestion 12a, A-07 §05
5Agreement of the minimal actions in Paper 3 (exponential decay of the minimisers, and cutting off)⑦bQuestion 12b
6Writing out the bookkeeping of the strong-coupling end, and improving the constant u0u_0The strong-coupling end of ⑦Question 13i
7The middle: show the comparison between scales by one of the four faces⑦cQuestion 13j
Order of work1Of the faces of the middle, test κw\kappa_w and δ(L0)\delta(L_0) numerically with U(1)U(1) as the control⑦cQuestion 13j
2The upper end: writing out the semiclassical theorem at fixed NN⑦bQuestions 12a, 12b, 12-02 §06
3The lower end: a computer-assisted estimate of the growth constant of surfaces, and formulating the criterion by mixing of the box flux⑦aQuestion 13h
4Add to Paper 2 the scan with step functions and the U(1)U(1) control— (a revision of the paper)A-07 §04

None of the rows of the two tables touches the differences outside the ledger (Outside 1–4). Questions aimed at the differences outside the ledger are in the table of tasks of Part 9 (9-04) and in the unknown column of the table of seven stages (9-06 Table 1).

07

Looking up from the ledger rows — for each row, the questions that concern it

Table 8 looks up Tables 2–7 again from the side of the ledger rows. The content of each row, its label and what is needed for it to disappear are in 14-02 Table 2; here we list only the numbers of the questions concerned. A row without questions is a row in which no step small enough to be shrunk into the form of a question is yet in sight.

Table 8 The ledger rows and the questions concerned (this book's arrangement)
RowQuestions concerned
① Ultraviolet controlQuestions 12f, 12g, 12o (in part). This book has no table that splits this row into small questions (6-07)
② Gap on a small T²— (the twist part is on paper in 12-01; the form uniform in aa depends on ①)
③ Uniform acceptance of the insertionQuestions 12g, 12h, 12j, 12m
④ The base point on a small T²Questions 12c, 13c
⑤ Reflection positivity in z— (closed in the record; what remains is placing the paper in the book)
⑥ The uniform slab gapQuestions 12e, 12f, 13b
⑦ The renormalisation comparisonStrong-coupling end: Question 13i / ⑦a: Question 13h / ⑦b: Questions 12a, 12b / ⑦c: Questions 12i, 13j / tests of candidates for ⑦c: Question 13p / outside the breakdown: Questions 12n, 13f, 13g, 13k
⑧ The bandQuestions 13a (the content), 13d, 13e (intermediate milestones), 12l, 13o (forms usable for testing the band), 13n (a touchstone)
⑨ What remains of the first stepQ7, Q8, Q14, Q15, Q16, F13, Questions 13l, 13m
⑩ The four-dimensional goal (side of time)Q4, Q5, Q9–Q13, Q17 and F1–F12, F14–F19 (all are questions that repair the form of the statement of ⑩, not ⑩ itself)
Outside 1, the limit to R4\mathbb R^4—
Outside 2, joining the area law and the gap— (even the statement of what it suffices to assume is not settled, 14-01 §04)
Outside 3, all compact simple groupsQuestion 12d (only the SU(N)SU(N) part)
Outside 4, verification—

What to read from Table 8. The rows with many questions are ⑦, ⑨ and ⑩, and the questions on the band itself, ⑧, gather in 13a. 13d and 13e are intermediate milestones weaker than ⑧, and settling them does not make ⑧ disappear. The differences outside the ledger have almost no steps that can be shrunk into the form of a question. Outside 2 starts, before any question is set, from making a statement of what needs to be shown.


What this chapter can say

What is saidWhat is not said
Which section of which chapter the questions of Parts 10 and 11 (Q1–Q17, F1–F19) and the candidate rules (N1–N6) came from (Tables 2–4)The answer to any question. The status and the full text of "what does not move even if settled" are in the source tables
A list of the questions that the text of Parts 12 and 13 left open, with their source sections (Tables 5 and 6)Estimates of the size of the questions. Of the sentences of chapters 13-03 to 13-05 and 13-09, only those that overlap with rows of Table 6 have been picked up
The correspondence between questions and ledger rows (Table 8, this book's arrangement)That settling a question makes a row disappear (the rule for rows disappearing is 14-02 §01)

Sources and reproduction

ItemKindSource / tools
Q1–Q17 of Table 2This book10-17 Table 3
F1–F19 and N1–N6 of Tables 3 and 4This book11-08 Table 1, Table 2
The questions of Tables 5 and 6This bookThe sections of the chapters in the right-hand column ("what cannot be said", "what remains", "what is lacking", "map")
The record's two tables in Table 7This bookFrom the material of Parts 12 and 13, the table of next moves (seven rows in order of the prospect of closing) and the "order of the next work" in the list of tasks up to a proof (four rows). The content of the rows has been replaced with the language of the chapters of the book
Numbers and names of the ledger rowsThis book14-02 Table 2, Table 3

Terms used in this chapter — ledger row, the differences outside the ledger, what does not move even if settled, intermediate milestone, the lateral-widening inequality, frame decorrelation, the base point on a small T², β-monotonicity, the renormalisation comparison, the four faces, candidate rules, the diffusive-relaxation-time assumption. Their meanings are in the A-02 Glossary and the A-06 Index of assumptions.

Next chapter to read: 14-04 What is not claimed (a cross-index) — the reverse side of the questions: what this book does not show, does not read strongly, and does not call false either.

← 14-02 The ledger of conditionsContents14-04 What is not claimed (a cross-index) →

Revised 2026-10-15: first version.