The whole book Contents and reading orders
- Part 0 Entrance — how to read this book
- 0-01 How to read this book
- 0-02 One picture
- 0-03 Reading the problem statement word by word
- 0-04 Four dimensions in mathematics and four dimensions in physics
- Part 1 Mathematical preparation
- 1-01 Vector spaces and linear maps
- 1-02 What a group is
- 1-03 Lie groups and Lie algebras
- 1-04 SU(2) and SU(3)
- 1-05 Manifolds and tangent spaces
- 1-06 Differential forms and the exterior derivative
- 1-07 Vector bundles and connections
- 1-08 Probability and measure
- 1-09 Probability in infinite dimensions
- 1-10 Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators
- 1-11 Fourier analysis and distributions
- 1-12 Detour: what happens only in four dimensions
- Part 2 Physical preparation
- 2-01 Lagrangians and the action
- 2-02 The idea of a field
- 2-03 Electromagnetism is a gauge theory
- 2-04 Special relativity and spacetime
- 2-05 The bones of quantum mechanics
- 2-06 The harmonic oscillator and creation and annihilation
- 2-07 The idea of the path integral
- 2-08 Statistical mechanics and phase transitions
- 2-09 Detour: the gap and the correlation length in the Ising model
- 2-10 The relaxation time and the dynamical exponent z
- Part 3 Yang–Mills theory (classical)
- 3-01 The gauge principle
- 3-02 Non-abelian gauge fields
- 3-03 The action and the equations
- 3-04 Gauge theory as geometry
- 3-05 Instantons and topology
- 3-06 Detour: Donaldson and exotic R⁴
- 3-07 Yang–Mills inside the Standard Model
- Part 4 Quantisation
- 4-01 Canonical quantisation and the Hamiltonian
- 4-02 The path integral and Euclideanisation
- 4-03 Perturbation theory and Feynman diagrams
- 4-04 Divergences and renormalisation
- 4-05 The algebra of divergences
- 4-06 Asymptotic freedom
- 4-07 Dimensional transmutation and Λ
- 4-08 Gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov
- 4-09 The axioms of quantum field theory
- 4-10 The Osterwalder–Schrader axioms and reconstruction
- 4-11 The definition of the mass gap
- 4-12 Detour: the perturbation series diverges
- Part 5 Lattice gauge theory
- 5-01 Wilson's lattice
- 5-02 The strong-coupling expansion
- 5-03 Reflection positivity and the transfer matrix
- 5-04 The infinite-volume limit and the cluster expansion
- 5-05 Weak coupling and the continuum limit
- 5-06 How U(1) differs from the non-abelian case
- 5-07 The Monte Carlo method
- 5-08 Measuring glueballs and the string tension
- 5-09 What to hold fixed when taking the limit
- 5-10 Lattice gauge theory with finite groups
- 5-11 Detour: Bakry–Émery and one-link integration
- Part 6 Constructive field theory
- 6-01 What constructive field theory is
- 6-02 Solvability in two dimensions and the Yang–Mills measure
- 6-03 Constructing scalar fields
- 6-04 The cluster expansion
- 6-05 The sequence of renormalisation group steps
- 6-06 Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional Yang–Mills
- 6-07 Four dimensions
- 6-08 Triviality of φ⁴ in four dimensions
- 6-09 Stochastic quantisation and regularity structures
- 6-10 Where four dimensions stops
- 6-11 Obstacles other than divergence
- 6-12 Detour: "if 1/0 is given a symbol"
- Part 7 From the side of physics
- 7-01 How physics sees it
- 7-02 Mechanisms of confinement
- 7-03 The string picture
- 7-04 Large N
- 7-05 String theory and extra dimensions
- 7-06 How extra dimensions become invisible
- 7-07 Where gauge fields come from
- 7-08 Holography
- 7-09 The mass gap becomes geometry
- 7-10 Back to four dimensions
- 7-11 Supersymmetry and Seiberg–Witten
- 7-12 The sentence that plays the role of an equivalence principle
- 7-13 Where the way physics digs parts from mathematics
- Part 8 A dictionary of two languages — the physical and the mathematical view
- 8-01 How to read the dictionary
- 8-02 Dictionary A
- 8-03 Dictionary B
- 8-04 Dictionary C
- 8-05 The physical counterparts of our assumptions
- The map
- Part 9 Where things stand, and open tasks
- 9-01 How far the world has come
- 9-02 Where the two ways of digging part
- 9-03 Candidates for new concepts
- 9-04 The list of open tasks
- 9-05 Common misconceptions
- 9-06 The stages a proof must contain — the table of seven stages
- The first road — from the direction of time
- Part 10 The first road, first half — from the direction of time: the mass gap and the diffusive-relaxation-time assumption
- 10-00 Entrance — the staircase, and the random walk, the ruler and the clock
- 10-01 The line of construction and Assumption ξ²
- 10-02 Roads tried on the four-dimensional lattice, and walls
- 10-03 The four steps of the staircase — why we start from 0+1 dimensions
- 10-04 The path measure of the double well, and kinks
- 10-05 The statement of the first step — four conditions and Proposition 4.5
- 10-06 (H1) Local Poincaré within a phase
- 10-07 The map of (H2) — seven routes and the seam of the ring
- 10-08 What computer-assisted means — the conditions on the chain inside the window
- 10-09 The sector framework and the three strands of route 5
- 10-10 The list of detour plans — types of breakage
- 10-11 (H3)(H4) and the constant of the core
- 10-12 The integrated table and the dependency graph
- 10-13 Lean statements and the limits of machine checking
- 10-14 Reconciliation — the numbers of the record and the known numbers
- 10-15 What remains and its cost — the distance to a theorem
- 10-16 What is not claimed
- 10-17 Insights and small questions
- Part 11 The first road, second half — repairing the form of the assumption, making time continuous
- 11-00 Further considerations — entrance
- 11-01 One form that obstructs Assumption ξ² — a nearly conserved global quantity
- 11-02 Choosing the ruler and the coordinates again — the length at which conservation breaks
- 11-03 Two ways to repair Assumption ξ² — the sector Assumption ξ² and the local Assumption ξ²
- 11-04 Which Assumption ξ² the one-sided bridge needs
- 11-05 Making time continuous — the Hamiltonian lattice and the vacuum measure
- 11-06 Paying with rarity instead of convexity — renormalisation on groups and log-Sobolev
- 11-07 Because it is four dimensions — the dimensionless coupling and topology
- 11-08 Questions, and what is not claimed
- 11-A1 Table of notation for Part 11
- The second road — from the direction of space
- Part 12 The second road: from the direction of space — a small twisted T² and confinement
- 12-00 Entrance — space, not time
- 12-01 The twisted T² and 't Hooft flux
- 12-02 Vortices and fractional instantons
- 12-03 Containers — conditioning on the frame makes things independent
- 12-04 Slab confinement
- 12-05 Vortex-insertion identities
- 12-06 Driven insertion and the flow lemma
- 12-07 Why fixed maps fail
- 12-08 The measured record
- 12-09 Where this road stops — widening the T² is the band
- The crossover band — two roads reach the same wall
- Part 13 The crossover band — two roads reach the same wall
- 13-00 Entrance — confluence
- 13-01 The correct form of the band
- 13-02 Reduction to a single inequality
- 13-03 The only place where non-abelian enters
- 13-04 Structure alone cannot cross
- 13-05 The chessboard and simultaneous flips
- 13-06 Renormalisation comparison — a comparison that distinguishes groups
- 13-07 The band seen from the side of time
- 13-08 A map of the roads tried and stopped
- 13-09 The measured record
- 13-10 Candidate new viewpoints
- 13-11 Ultraviolet control — what it means to close at infinitely many steps
- Closing
- Part 14 Closing — conditional statements
- 14-00 Entrance — the promise of this part
- 14-01 The conditional statement — the mass gap and confinement, arrow by arrow
- 14-02 The ledger of conditions
- 14-03 The table of questions (a cross-index)
- 14-04 What is not claimed (a cross-index)
- The ultraviolet wall — the foundation beneath both roads
- Part 15 Ultraviolet control — what it means to close at infinitely many steps
- 15-00 Entrance — what ultraviolet control is
- 15-01 Why the ultraviolet is hard — dimensionless coupling, group-valued fields, gauge
- 15-02 A map of the sources — Bałaban's programme, the BBS chain, two rows absent from the sources
- 15-03 The decomposition statement — a class that closes with finitely many parameters, and three remainders
- 15-04 The one-link heat-kernel class and the hierarchical model
- 15-05 The flux-network theorem — the transverse contraction and the parameter flow in one projection
- 15-06 Counting the parameters — couplings by loop shape and the attracting class
- 15-07 Background-dependent fluctuations η — absorption step by step
- 15-08 The four rows that do not close, and proposals for them
- 15-09 What cannot be said, the index of questions, the dependency diagram
- Appendices
- A-01 Table of notation
- A-02 Glossary
- A-03 Guide to the literature
- A-04 Lean and machine checking
- A-05 How this book was made
- A-06 Index of assumptions
- A-07 Papers that came out of this book
What cannot be said, the index of questions, the dependency diagram
What this chapter shows — what cannot be said across Part 15 as a whole (a summary), an index of the questions F-UV1–F-UV15 left by the chapters, the dependency diagram between chapters, the five grades of the main rows of each chapter, and the correspondence between the Lean bundle used in this part and the text.
Prerequisite chapters — 15-00 (entrance). The other chapters are reached from the rows of the tables on this page.
Said first — This chapter adds no new results. Questions are questions, not claims. No chapter of this part shows ① ultraviolet control. The Lean bundles of this part have passed re-verification by the main session (one file at a time on Shiori's machine), but the labels in the text do not use Lean (paper proofs stay [Proved here]); the bundles are only listed in Table 3. Attaching the bundle labels to the text is for the next version.
- What cannot be said — eight items for the whole part, and the items of each chapter
- The index of questions — F-UV1–F-UV15 (Table 1)
- The dependency diagram of the chapters
- Summary of the five grades (Table 2)
- The Lean correspondence of this part (Table 3)
- Connection to Part 14 and the glossary
What this chapter shows
- What Part 15 does not say comes down to eight items. Each is there to stop readings that drop the conditions "smallest systems, leading term, one step, form of a statement" (§01).
- There are fifteen questions, and each touches one component inside ① of the ledger. Settling them does not close ① (§02).
- The dependencies run from the entrance (15-00), the difficulty (15-01) and the original sources (15-02) to the decomposition statement (15-03), branch into the computational line (15-04–15-06) and the wall line (15-07, 15-08), and return to 15-09 (§03).
What cannot be said
We gather what is not said across the whole part into eight items. The finer items of each chapter are in that chapter's "What cannot be said" section.
(a) ① ultraviolet control is not closed. Part 15 shows none of (U1)(U2)(U3), in four dimensions or in two. What it shows is statements of what would need to be shown, line-by-line computations, elementary lemmas (Lemma F, Lemma R, Proposition O, Lemma H, the flux network theorem), and numbers for the smallest systems.
(b) The arithmetic under the one-loop flow is not a theorem about the actual sequence of effective couplings. The divergence and finiteness of the sums in 15-01 are arithmetic that treats the one-loop flow as an exact equation.
(c) The numbers for the smallest systems are not the numbers of a real blocking step. The numbers of 15-05 and 15-06 are for the tree level restricted to commuting configurations (the leading term of ), the one-loop level, one step seen through the marginal distribution of a single coarse plaquette, and small boxes (free boundary, free only on the outer rim, periodic); they are not numbers for a step that includes blocks embedded in the four-dimensional lattice, re-fixing of the gauge, and large fields.
(d) The results for the hierarchical model do not imply anything in four dimensions. The Migdal–Kadanoff map of 15-04 sends a single-plaquette weight back to a single-plaquette weight; multi-link couplings, re-fixing and the remainder from large fields are structurally absent, and it is a model in which confinement occurs even at . The range checked by interval arithmetic is only a finite interval of , and the limit is not closed.
(e) Lemma H is a statement only for one step, and only when the law of the fluctuations does not depend on the background. The true measure of the fluctuations in one step depends on the background, and the absorption of that dependence and the multi-step induction have not been written (15-07).
(f) The decomposition statement and T⁴-UV are statements. The decomposition of 15-03 and the statement T⁴-UV of 15-02 are in the form of [Assumption] and are not proved. Of the implications, only Lemma F and the arithmetic of geometric series were checked elementarily.
(g) Much of the checking against the original sources is at the level of abstracts and introductions. Stages 4 and 5 of the series and 119 are from abstracts, stages 1–3 from titles, and Theorems 1 and 2 from the abstract and introduction of the last paper. Appendix A.6 of BBS was read in the text itself (15-02).
(h) The proposals for the four rows that do not close are proposals. The proposals of 15-08 are ideas before verification, and none of them closes any of the four rows. We say neither "there is no action that closes with one parameter" nor "(Cls) closes with finitely many parameters".
The index of questions — F-UV1–F-UV15
Table 1 gathers into one the questions left by the chapters of Part 15. F-UV1–3 inherit the numbers of 13-11 (their content updated in 15-03), and from F-UV4 on, a band of numbers was assigned to each chapter. The status and size of each question, and "what does not move even if settled", are in the table of the chapter of origin and are not copied here. Whichever question is settled, ① of the ledger does not close.
| Q. | Question (one line) | Components concerned | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-UV1 | Does the one-step map contract transversally on the one-parameter class it draws towards? (i) Do and the source stay finite for blocks embedded in the four-dimensional lattice? (ii) Is the constant of the one-step inequality independent of the step? (iii) Is the weight of the sign of the centre needed as a separate parameter? | (Cls), (Rem-shape) | 15-03 §07 |
| F-UV2 | The smallest model in which (S) can be shown including large fields (a hierarchical ). Can absorption under a constraint for a single plaquette be restated at the true critical point for many plaquettes? | (Rem-flow), (S) | 15-03 §07 |
| F-UV3 | On the twisted lattice, is the smallest eigenvalue of the operator of the adjoint fluctuations around an isolated flat connection at least ? Is the group version of property 3 unchanged by the twist? | (T-Z) of T⁴-UV | 15-03 §07 |
| F-UV4 | Extend the tube and the attracting curve of the hierarchical model to (the seam between asymptotic estimates and interval arithmetic) | (Cls) of the hierarchical model | 15-04 §05 |
| F-UV5 | Check the lower bound of the curvature outside the layer and the weight of the layer by interval arithmetic, and separate the flow coefficient on the curve from | (Rem-flow) of the hierarchical model | 15-04 §05 |
| F-UV6 | Along the sequence of coarse-plaquette sides , does the source (now –, transverse thickness 4) settle to a constant as the transverse directions are widened? | The sum of the source over steps | 15-05 |
| F-UV7 | On the tree-level network with all coarse plaquettes fixed, can a local representative be built that gives an upper bound uniform in the volume? Does the operator norm of in the coarse directions fall below 1? | The transverse contraction (matrix) | 15-05 §07 |
| F-UV8 | Derive on paper the one-step correction to for four in a row, giving the constant of the one-step inequality for (Rem-shape) | (Rem-shape) | 15-06 |
| F-UV9 | Is the attracting class still uniquely determined when loop shapes other than four in a row (2×2, L-shaped, mixed quartic) are included? Does the fixed point stay put when the definition of the diagonal is changed? | The coordinates of (Cls) | 15-06 |
| F-UV10 | For four in a row, split the joint law of into a product of local couplings × a density, and find the lowest degree in of the score of the density and the isotropy of the quadratic form | Absorption of | 15-07 |
| F-UV11 | Can the smallest multi-step statement be written in the hierarchical model or a two-dimensional model ((ivG) and the contraction of the many-body norm)? The width of the band of analyticity of the coupling. Numbers for the smallest systems are the next test | The multi-step induction | 15-07 |
| F-UV12 | Derive the Lipschitz constant of the read-off on paper, and measure on a slab the difference in total variation between the density with one large field inserted and without | Row 1 (S) | 15-08 |
| F-UV13 | When a source is added to four in a row, is the shift of the coupling linear in ? On paper, the position-dependent coupling for Villain | Row 2 (T-Obs) | 15-08 |
| F-UV14 | Does the evenness of the critical point hold for four plaquettes? (paired with F-UV10) | Row 3 | 15-08 |
| F-UV15 | Split the one-loop Hessian of a block with blocking factor 2 and measure the coefficient of the ghost (negative control: ). Formalise the direct-product decomposition of the tree gauge for finite groups | Row 4 | 15-08 |
Reading Table 1. F-UV1, F-UV8 and F-UV9 are questions about the coordinates of (Cls) and (Rem-shape); F-UV2 and F-UV12 are questions about (S), corresponding to the content of Theorem 2; F-UV10, F-UV11 and F-UV14 are questions about row 3 of the core (absorption of and the multi-step). Questions that numbers for the smallest systems can answer are mixed with paper questions.
The dependency diagram of the chapters
We arrange the dependencies between chapters so that prerequisite chapters come above (the number of a prerequisite is smaller than the number of the conclusion). To the right of the arrow are the earlier chapters that the chapter uses.
[15-00] Entrance problem, (U1)(U2)(U3), form that closes in one step, misreadings [15-01] Difficulty ⟸ [15-00] dimensionless coupling, group-valued fields, gauge [15-02] Sources ⟸ [15-00] series, Theorem 1/2, BBS chain, T⁴-UV [15-03] Decomposition ⟸ [15-01][15-02] (Cls)(Rem-flow)(Rem-shape)(C), Lemma F, bookkeeping [15-04] Heat kernel ⟸ [15-03] telescoping sum, invariant curve, tube (β∈[2.46,64]) [15-05] Flux network ⟸ [15-03][15-04] Theorem F, inequality, table of boxes, Theorem G [15-06] Parameters ⟸ [15-03][15-05] couplings by loop shape, attracting class [15-07] Background η ⟸ [15-01][15-02][15-03] Lemma R, Lemma H, shift of local couplings (proposal) [15-08] Four open rows ⟸ [15-05][15-06][15-07] statements and proposals for four rows, dependencies (row 3 is the core) [15-09] Index ⟸ [15-00]–[15-08]
To check it, see that the number of every chapter to the right of "⟸" is smaller than the one on the left. There are no cycles. No node of this diagram is a node saying that ① has been shown.
Summary of the five grades
Table 2 picks only the main rows from the five grades table of each chapter. The full statements, grounds and ranges of the rows are in the table of each chapter.
| Chapter | Main row | Grade | Range (excerpt) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15-00 | Number of steps , lower bound for the product of losses | Proved here | |
| 15-00 | (U1)(U2)(U3) and the form that closes in one step | Assumption | From to , constants independent of the step |
| 15-01 | Logarithmic divergence of , the sum of is finite, Proposition O | Proved here | Under the one-loop flow (arithmetic) |
| 15-02 | Theorem 1 with assumption (U3), Theorem 2 unpublished, Lemma A.6.1 of BBS | Cited | Abstract and introduction / text of Appendix A.6 |
| 15-02 | Statement T⁴-UV | Assumption | , , finite volume |
| 15-03 | Lemma F, the bookkeeping of the transverse contraction | Proved here | Under (S)(C) / assuming the one-step inequality |
| 15-03 | The decomposition statement ((Cls) is the one-parameter attracting class + a contracting form) | Assumption | Form of the statement only |
| 15-04 | Saddle-point estimates for MK (1/16, 1/3600, ) | Proved here | Leading term at the saddle |
| 15-04 | Invariance of the tube, pointwise contraction, attracting curve | Computer-assisted | MK map, single plaquette of , (curve ) |
| 15-05 | Theorem F, , inequality for coarse-plaquette side , Theorem G | Proved here | Tree level restricted to commuting configurations, 4 coarse plaquettes symmetric (lower bound) |
| 15-05 | Table of boxes, type of the boundary, source , in the coarse directions | Reading | Small boxes, one loop (starting from the heat kernel, ) |
| 15-06 | , the tree map and 9/89, , | Proved here | Four in a row, one-loop level / leading term of Laplace |
| 15-06 | Fundamental + adjoint root , no root for the prefactor family | Reading | , quadratic, (root) / |
| 15-07 | Lemma R, Lemma H, the quaternion identity | Proved here | Lemma H for one step, when the law of the fluctuations does not depend on the background |
| 15-07 | The group version of properties 3 and 4, the proposal of the shift of local couplings | Assumption | Statement and proposal |
| 15-08 | (U2) is a Chebyshev corollary of (iiiG), the tree gauge has no Jacobian | Proved here | Assuming (iiiG) / axial gauge |
| 15-08 | Statements of the four rows and their dependencies (row 3 is the core) | Assumption, Reading | Statements, estimates |
The Lean correspondence of this part
Table 3 lists the bundles written in Lean 4 for the elementary parts of the text of this part, as finite sums, real algebra and trigonometric identities. None of them contains sorry, and the axioms printed at the end were only the three standard ones (propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound). The re-verification by the main session (2026-10-15, one file at a time with lake env lean) also gave rc=0, sorry 0, native_decide 0 and the three standard axioms for all seven. The labels in the text stay [Proved here]; the Lean labels will be attached in the next version. No bundle contains the lattice, the group, the measure or the minimisation itself. What they contain is single algebraic lines from inside the paper proofs.
| Bundle name | Main theorems and assumptions | Place in the text | Not included |
|---|---|---|---|
| LatticeGauge.ClassResidualTelescoping | telescoping_residual (increment of the deviation at each step ), telescoping_residual_multi (same assumptions, n parameters), inv_sq_sum_le (), uniform_deviation (, increment ) | 15-03 §04, 15-04 | Measure, curvature, map |
| LatticeGauge.HierarchicalShapeFlow | quarticStep_fixed (fixed point 1/3600 of ), shapeStep_contract (), flow_coefficient (), affine_contraction (, each step ), tube_iterate | 15-04 | The interval-arithmetic tube, the derivation of the leading term at the saddle |
| LatticeGauge.FluxNetwork | ratio_le_max (each , ), ratio_ge_of_unit_flux (unit flux), energy_split (), thomson_lower, thomson_attained, minimizer_unique (the set is closed under midpoints), quad_lower (), chain_one_step (five inequalities) | 15-05 §02, 15-07 Lemma H | Projection, the Dirichlet principle, interchange of differentiation in the Taylor seminorm, invariance of Haar measure |
| LatticeGauge.AllFacesBlocking | fine_energy_lower (the map to sets of four plaquettes is injective), block_energy_lower, smooth_ratio (), equal_split_ratio | 15-05 §07 | Pseudo-inverse, coarse Bianchi, Fourier symbols |
| LatticeGauge.RatioTwoCriterion | ratio_two_iff, one_loop_D (, in the form with the Gaussian moments substituted), gamma_family_one_loop_lower (), fund_adj_one_loop_root (, ), no_pointwise_sqrt_one_loop | 15-06 | Haar measure, moments, integration by parts, saddle-point expansion |
| LatticeGauge.FundAdjointRefit | refit_solution (), tree_quadratic_split, tree_value_at_saddle, image_rho, image_gap (), image_one_loop_D | 15-06 | Convolution, reduction to the tree, the envelope argument |
| LatticeGauge.PrefactorFlowFixedPoint | step_k2, step_k2_fixed_iff (fixed point 37/76), step_k2_contract, fixed_point_general, transverse_hessian (), convolution_prefactor, rem_shape_geometric (, assuming the one-step inequality), ratio_coefficient | 15-06, 15-03 §04 | Convolution on the group, the Laplace method, one-loop formulas |
Connection to Part 14 and the glossary
The row ① ultraviolet control of the ledger of conditions (14-02) is split into smaller pieces by Table 1 of this part (questions) and 15-08 Table 1 (the four rows that do not close). Its label and state (Assumption, open) do not change. The cross index of questions (14-03) cites F-UV1–F-UV15 of this part as a fifth origin. The words added in this part (the invariant curve, the transverse contraction, the source, the flux network, couplings by loop shape, the attracting class, the shift of local couplings) are in the A-02 glossary.
What this chapter can say
| Can say | Cannot say |
|---|---|
| Index: questions, dependencies, summary of the five grades, correspondence of the Lean bundle (this chapter adds no new results) | ① ultraviolet control. The settlement of any of the questions |
| That the Lean bundle depends only on the three standard axioms (printed for each bundle) | Formalisation of the lattice, the group, the measure and the minimisation (re-verification by the main session is done) |
Sources and reproduction
| Item | Kind | Source, tool |
|---|---|---|
| What cannot be said, questions, five grades | This book's study | The tables and sections of each chapter 15-00–15-08 |
| The Lean bundle | This book's study | The record of the formalisation of this book's study (Lean 4, with the axioms printed at the end of each bundle). Re-verification by the main session done (2026-10-15) |
Words used in this chapter — what cannot be said, Question F-UV, the dependency diagram, the five grades, the Lean bundle. Their meanings are in the A-02 glossary.
Next chapter to read: 14-00 Entrance — the promise of this part (the whole conditional statement, including ① of the ledger).
← 15-08 The four rows that do not close, and proposals for themContentsA-01 Table of notation →
2026-10-15 (same day): the seven Lean bundles passed re-verification by the main session, so "not yet" was changed to "done" in Table 3 and in the table of scope.